In the ESPN article, “Jury convicts Becker of murder,” it shares the news of the conviction of Mark Becker and tells more of the story behind the murder of Ed Thomas. Jurors, rejecting Mark Becker's pleas of not guilty by reason of insanity, was found guilty in the shooting of his high school football coach. Becker explained to psychiatrists that after months of torment, he shot Thomas at least six times in the high school weight room, then kicked his body before walking away. The article states that Jurors heard about Becker's delusions, how he believed that the community was against him and that Ed Thomas Applington-Parkersburg coach was satan. The defense claimed that Becker's delusions were so severe that he didn't know right from wrong.
Although he did not want to commit these murders, he did and he is now paying for what he has done. “dozens of complaints and disciplinary citations, a handful of police investigations, up to 20 suicide attempts, and several lockdowns in a psychiatric ward. “(Crocker, 2013) My question is if he had these many suicide attempts why was he still allowed to work around other people. He worked at nine different hospitals which is not
She recalls, she thought that she was dealing with a cunning serial killer, made all the more dangerous because of his wealth. "I saw the pictures of the cut up body," Criss says. "That body was cut up like it has been done by a surgeon. He knew what sort of tools to use for this bone and that muscle. It would have been impossible for someone to do that, if it was their first murder attempt.
Sufferers often show regular intellectual functioning and are able to display affection. This explains why he is “stressed” when ask to be a witness. After he killed John and ran out of the house he began to get paranoid and show anxiety. He shows the anger from feuds with John Hossack and, after the trial by his “violent” tendencies. This evidence makes him obviously capable of killing him.
Doctors, one side of the coin they are viewed as the ones that can cure the sick with their knowledge, the ones that are supposed to help them get better. The other side they are feared and are avoided at all cost by some. Doctors have this bad reputation about them because sometimes they don’t even tell their patients what is wrong with them. Or the patients themselves don’t even question the doctors because they went to school and have a prestigious piece of paper. In “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” by Rebecca Skloot, she describes benevolent deception, which doctors had no trouble of doing in the mid-century, as the doctors keeping their patients in the dark.
The Demented Doctor “The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we’re doing it.” said Josef Mengele. He knew his own wrong doings all too well. This seemed to be the hard cold truth to every soul that was taken by the “Angel of Death”.
Gawande was able to find four physicians who participated in executions at prisons who were willing to talk about their experience. They shared what their role was and why they participated. Because of the sensitive nature of capital punishment and people’s strong opinions about it the physicians who participated remained anonymous. Each doctor had slightly different reasons for participating, the first doctor knew the warden of a prison in his town and first did it to help the warden out. The doctor started by doing nothing more than standing behind a current and watching a heart monitor, when it flat lined he sent a different physician out to listen to the heart and check for a pulse and assure the inmate was dead.
Through the characters of Hester Prynne, Reverend Arthur Dimmesdale, and Roger Chillingworth, there is a common factor of a fatal flaw. Hester Prynne’s constant attempt to atone for her sin causes her to diminish her unique personality, instead conforming to the norm of being a Puritan woman. Dimmesdale’s incapability to forgive his sin with Hester leads him to deteriorate physically and psychologically to the point of death. Roger Chillingworth’s cruelty and desire for revenge lead him to become an evil, deformed
Gary Kinder’s book, Victim: The Other Side of Murder, offers a disturbing record of the murder and attempted murder of five individuals in a murder/robbery planned by an individual who should have never been free to commit such a heinous crime to begin with. Kinder’s book allows the reader to essentially get into the heads of the people who must experience the fallout of this devastating event, and offers a unique perspective on how the indirect victims of crime can be impacted just as direct victims are. The purpose of this paper is to examine the experiences of a father, Byron Nasibitt and his son Cortney Naisbitt; one an indirect victim of crime and the other, a direct victim, both of whom were forced to deal with the devastating effects
For as long as I worked here I never had a good feeling about the doctor as he would smile at me creepily then inevitably brush my shoulder each time we passed. But, to be a physiatrist in an insane asylum you would almost have to be insane, yourself. As a nurse this is what I thought to myself on the days I had seen Richard and Philippe next to each other. Three months after the men had become acquaintances, Richard along with Philippe went missing one night in the beginning of April, murders across the northeast in Connecticut, New York, including Massachusetts had begun, the next month over one hundred killings had been reported all butchered and dissected.
At the turn of the 19th century, the rates for pregnancy out of wedlock rose dramatically, along with the decline of social and sexual control over the younger generation. Born in 1820, Rogers may have already been another statistic to the rising sexual culture. The women she referred to as mother, may in fact have been her grandmother. New York was the city in which she and her sixty-two-year-old mother ran a boarding house until her death. New York had become a prime example of the dangers of cultural practices that called for change in the mid-1800s.
While what he did was horrible and insane-like, the narrator did this process very sanely and put lots of thought into it. No absolute insane person would spend days and days watching someone sleep, or acting perfectly normal around victim just so they could tike their kill perfectly, even though watching someone sleep is an insane trait. He was very cautious in this, “But you should have seen how wisely I proceeded -- with what caution -- with what foresight, with what dissimulation, I went to work!” and proved to be quite patient, “It took me an hour to place my whole head within the opening so far that I could see him as he lay upon his bed.’’ So he couldn’t have been totally insane, right?
First of all he stalked this old man for a week, and watched him as he slept. Second he kills the old man because he believes that the mans heart beating will wake up the neighbors. Someone 's heart can not beat so loud that the neighbors can hear it. His sanity wasn 't in tack because to believe that someone in another house can hear someone 's heart beat is insane. Third killing the old man due to his heart beating loudly is a poor excuse to kill someone.
A character having an ability to be an influence of fatality is a dangerously powerful trait to have. The victim’s life is placed into the hands of the influencer. This power of fatality can be seen within Robert Frost’s poem, “Out, Out,” when a personified buzz saw cuts the hand off the boy using it. This injury causes him to die. This power of fatality can also be seen in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s short story, “The Birthmark,” a scientist, named Aylmer creates a risky and unreliable potion that was expected to remove his wife’s birthmark but, it ultimately kills her.
He describes Mary screaming, “ as though infected,” while the girls cower, “as though” they had been cursed. (118) These similes paint a detailed picture of the scene, intensifying the craziness and depicting the mass hysteria in the courtroom. Mary, due to Miller’s directing, embodies the sense of fear driving the panic of the scene. She sustains the wildness of all previous allegations through her exclamation that John Proctor is, “the Devil’s man.