ipl-logo

Dred Scott Decision Research Paper

359 Words2 Pages

The Dred Scott decision of 1865 consisted of several implications on the status of free blacks in the United States, as well as concept of popular sovereignty, and the future of slavery in America. however, I believe the implications of the Dred Scott decision was for the status of free blacks in the United States due to the impacts it caused and the questions it rose. First of all, Dred Scott was an enslaved African American man from Missouri who moved in with his master Peter Blow, in Illinois, a free state. Dred Scott unsuccessfully fought for his freedom by claiming that being a resident in a free state made him a free man. However, in supreme court it was ruled that because blacks can not be recognized as citizens, they did not have …show more content…

Thus, the decision prevented free blacks from advancing in society. The constitution did not apply to them, which consequently developed a lot of confusion and created problems the future free blacks and slaves in the United States. Last of all, even though free blacks were considered as free men, the court failed to recognize them as citizens. This meant that free blacks still did not receive the rights they deserved. The Dred Scott decision was to define the free black’s status and define what rights they did and did not have, since the constitution did not apply to them. In conclusion, I believe the implications of the Dred Scott decision of 1865 was for the status of free blacks in the United States. Dred Scott, the African American slave fought for his freedom in Illinois, but was unsuccessful. The court’s decision rose questions and greatly impacted the status of free blacks. The slaves and the free blacks did not apply to the constitution, and were not recognized as citizens, which rose questions as to what rights they had and did not

Show More
Related
509 Words | 3 Pages

Dred Scott was taken back into slavery and accused Sandford because Scott was in a free states and claimed that he was in the free state long enough to be a free slave. The Supreme court ruled against Dred Scott, this decision affected blacks preventing them to become citizens and an giving them the right to appeal to a jury and making it harder for a slave to escape because the free states didn’t make a runaway slave a free slave. The case also affected popular sovereignty. Where states got to choose if they were to be a free states or a slave

Read More
880 Words | 4 Pages

In Document 3b, according to Paul Finkelman, it pushed the nation closer to war, that it destroyed any chance of an agreement between the North and South over slavery in the territories. Therefore, the impact of the Dred Scott decision brought the nation closer to the Civil War by opening the Northerners who believed that slavery could be tolerable as long as it stayed in the South and brought them to realize that if they did not stop slavery now, they might never have that chance again. The Dred Scott v. Sandford

Read More
1206 Words | 5 Pages

Further, the judge revoked the law stating that frontier and other free territories would no longer be free and that black people would no longer have the right to appear in court. The judge also made it a law in the Dred Scott decision that, “no black person could be a citizen of the United States”. (Foner, p. 57). The outcome of the supreme court case of Dred Scott v. Sandford showed how completely the justice system failed and hindered the rights of African Americans. This controversial case was an obvious example of how freedom didn’t change for African Americans.

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

America’s founders created the constitution in order to create unification and order in the United States. However, there have been controversy surrounding the interpretation of the constitution, this has caused debate over many issues within the country. These issues and the lack of wartime policy within the constitution directly lead to the Civil War, which was one of the worst alterations this nation has faced. The Missouri compromise, the Dred Scott decision, and Bleeding Kansas were controversial issues surrounding the constitution that directly lead to the Civil War.

Read More
1004 Words | 5 Pages

In 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney made an announcement on the court’s decision. The U.S. Supreme Court eventually ruled that black Americans were not citizens and didn 't have the same rights as white people. Whether a black man was a slave or free, he could never become a US Citizen. This meant I didn 't have the right to even file his lawsuit. The Constitution was twisted in many ways by the court in this case.

Read More
322 Words | 2 Pages

Herbert Hill strongly believes we should adopt a strong affirmative active action policies that mandate quotes and/or timetables. He also argues there must be some benchmark, and some tangible measures of change. Hill states a system based on race existed for many generations under the U.S. Constitution. This system defined black people as property not as human beings. In the Dred Scott Decision of 1857, Chief Justice Taylor declares that black people have not rights and they are just articles of merchandise.

Read More
1098 Words | 5 Pages

Dred Scott was a slave that attempted to sue for his freedom. The case rose to the Supreme Court, and justices ruled in 1857 that slaves were mere property, with none of the rights or recognition assumed to human beings. This decision threatened to overturn the entire basis of the laws that had hitherto managed to prevent a civil war. The classification of slaves as property rose question to the authority of the government to regulate this institution. The Southern states once again challenged the territorial confines of slavery and opposition intensified.

Read More
980 Words | 4 Pages

The court also argued that Scott's as a citizen of a free state did not make him a US citizen. He could not clarify as an American citizen because he was black. The decision in Dred Scott v Sandford raised tension between the North and

Read More
94 Words | 1 Pages

The end result of the Dred Scott decision was Chief Justice Roger Taney 's decision that Congress did not possess the jurisdiction to stop slavery from spreading into other territories, even if they were considered free. Even worse, any free Black could now be allowably forced into slavery. Being forced into slavery was also seen as being beneficial to the free Blacks. Instead of reaching a decision as President Buchanan had hoped, it had started a rapid expansion of the conflict. This rapid expansion over the issue of slavery eventually led to the Civil War.

Read More
538 Words | 3 Pages

Dred Scott vs Sanford took a step back towards reducing the unbalance between races. This federal case confirmed that African Americans, enslaved or free, are not citizens of the United States. Thereafter, this was the prime leader to the Civil War. Making the judgment that African Americans are known as non-citizens means so much more, despite the fact they known as 'slaves' or 'immigrants' but they had a disadvantage to everything. In this case it enabled slaves to sue at a Federal Courts, when whites are able too.

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

In the Plessy v Ferguson case, it resulted in the agreement of ‘separate but equal’ which is the opposite of what was needed to bring the Civil Rights movement forward. This is opposition to African American’s because they ruled for segregation. The Strauder v West Virginia case is also an opposition to African American’s as it was ruled that only White American’s were to serve as judges in the Supreme Court. Finally, the Williams v Mississippi case was opposition to African American’s because it ruled that to be able to vote, you had to be able to pass a literacy test. This was opposition to African American’s as a lot of them would not be able to pass a literacy test as they would not have been educated well enough if at all to be able to pass a literacy test.

Read More
540 Words | 3 Pages

In 1833 the American Anti-Slavery Society was established. The group was a national alliance of abolitionist groups and The Compromise of 1850 was a settlement signed to avoid conflict between the North and South, like a civil war. Within the Compromise of 1850 was the Fugitive Slaw Law, which meant that any person in a free state who assists a runaway slave is violating the law and, therefore, will be punished along with the escaped slave (McMichael 287). Seven years downstream, the supreme court ruled, “that African Americans were not citizens and so could not expect the protection of the courts” (McMichael 287). This became known word wide as the Dred Scott Decision and is taught in today’s history classes as

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

The trial of the Scottsboro boys was a trial that was the cause of two white women accusing nine black men of raping them. Their appeals, retrials, and legal proceedings attracted the attention of the nation and produced to Supreme Court rulings in their favor. The Scottsboro boys trial demonstrates that nonconformity to unjust practices can lead to justice for all people because their trial triggered The Supreme Court ruling that had a major impact on the American system of laws for the right to adequate counsel, the ruling for the right to not be excluded from a jury based on race, and still has a continuing effect in our own time which affirms the principle of equal protection under the law. Their case not only saved them from the death sentence but also started up debate about equal protection under the law such as in the first Supreme Court ruling.

Read More
393 Words | 2 Pages

These supreme court cases continued to strengthen the Black Codes. African Americans not only suffered in injustice laws, but also the threat from white community

Read More
1938 Words | 8 Pages

But this declaration of liberty was troubled from the outset by the presence of slavery. Slave owners argued that their liberty was paramount, since it involved property, their slaves, and that the slaves themselves had no rights that any White man was obliged to recognize. The Supreme Court, in the Dred Scott decision, upheld this principle. It was not until 1866, following the Civil War, that the US Constitution was amended to extend these rights to persons of color, and not until 1920 that these rights were extended to

Read More

More about Dred Scott Decision Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document