ipl-logo

Dred Scott Vs Stanford Case Analysis

752 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Plessy v ferguson vs brown v board of education

In 1857 the court case of Dread Scott v. Stanford and in 1896 the case Plessy v. Ferguson were introduced into the Supreme Court. They showed people of color were not considered to be anything other than property; the whole majority had no regard for the feelings of another person. The notion of slavery was just coming to light in the United States. As time grew on, the slaves and former slaves were rightly becoming increasingly outraged. Through evaluating language of exclusion throughout both Dread Scott v. Stanford and Plessy v. Ferguson concurrently, anyone can recognize the effects of dehumanization negatively impacting members of the black community. This is disconcerting because African Americans are human beings and should be treated as such. The case of Dread Scott v. Stanford harshly administered both exclusionary and dehumanizing language. In this case, the …show more content…

Stanford case employs language of entitlement, so does Plessy v. Ferguson. According to the author, a “mulatto” man, Plessy, was determined to sit in the “white” coach. He appealed to the Supreme Court only after being convicted; the Court did not rule in his favor (Mayhew, Rothenburg, 2013). The plaintiff states, “Upon the other hand, if he be a colored man and be assigned so [a colored coach], he has been deprived of no property, since he is not lawfully entitled to the reputation of a colored man,” (Mayhew, Rothenburg, 2013, p. 549). This encompasses language of entitlement through the mindset of the Caucasian male. Their mindset suggests that they were dubbed as superior. Anything other than a “white” man was property. As a result, members of the “black” community were denoted as a purchase rather than a living being. The owners of their slaves had no regard to how anyone else felt; shown by how they dehumanized African Americans. They make the argument that property cannot have property, therefore Plessy is not allowed to sit as he

Show More
Related
319 Words | 2 Pages

The Dred Scott verses Stanford was a Supreme Court case which recognized African American slaves not as people but as property. Dred Scott was an African American slave in Missouri for many years. Later he moved along with his owner to Illinois, then to the Wisconsin Territory where slavery was not allowed. After they returned to Missouri, Scott’s owner passed away. The owner’s wife took the ownership of Scott.

Read More
666 Words | 3 Pages

The South, home to most African Americans in that time, sought out ways to legally exclude African Americans. Homer Plessy had decided to test new segregation laws that had been passed a year earlier. A few months prior, Daniel Desdunes had also sat in the whites-only section, and his case had never made it to trial. However, in Plessy’s case, the Supreme Court was able to rule the new laws constitutional in a seven to one decision; “separate but equal” would be completely legal if both sections are equal.

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

Annabelle Wintson Bower History 8A March 12, 2018 Title Although the slavery was abolished in 1865, the rights given to African Americans were not nearly equal to those of white Americans. After slavery was abolished, inequality in American society ran high, and many laws were put in place to restrict the rights and abilities of African Americans. Some laws include the Jim Crow Laws (1870 to 1950s) and the Supreme Court Ruling of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) that ruled that there could be “separate but equal” facilities and services for people of color and white Americans.

Read More
1725 Words | 7 Pages

Ferguson was a court case that arose in Louisiana, and it created a drastically different atmosphere in 1896. This court case gave state laws that required black and white people to use separate facilities. The case came into light when Homer Plessy, an African-American, never moved to the “colored only” section on a train. Plessy was said to have had his Fourteenth Amendment violated because the separated facilities were discriminating; however the Court stated that the separate facilities were separate yet equal. Separate yet equal means that people have the same rights, but are separated by their race, religion, and wealth.

Read More
1551 Words | 7 Pages

For nearly a century, the United States was occupied by the racial segregation of black and white people. The constitutionality of this “separation of humans into racial or other ethnic groups in daily life” had not been decided until a deliberate provocation to the law was made. The goal of this test was to have a mulatto, someone of mixed blood, defy the segregated train car law and raise a dispute on the fairness of being categorized as colored or not. This test went down in history as Plessy v. Ferguson, a planned challenge to the law during a period ruled by Jim Crow laws and the idea of “separate but equal” without equality for African Americans. This challenge forced the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of segregation, and in result of the case, caused the nation to have split opinions of support and

Read More
1800 Words | 8 Pages

Since African-Americans migrated to the Unites States, blacks have been treated inferior to whites. Even after the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments were put into effect and the court case Plessy v. Ferguson, which the court ruled out a “separate but equal” regime for blacks, blacks were still treated substandard to whites (“Civil”). African-Americans had long been repudiated civil rights and freedoms that were guaranteed to whites and felt that change was needed, inaugurating the momentum for the Civil Rights Movement. After the Civil War African-Americans were freed from slavery and allowed to live on their own, even though whites still treated blacks as unequal (“Patterson”).

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

As the document “Life and Liberty” said, “but he shall not be free to dine and drink at our table - to serve on a jury - to be a witness in court - to represent us in the legislature - to be a doctor - to join us at a concert, a lecture, the theater, or the church, or to marry our daughters. We are of another race, and he is inferior. Let him know his place - and keep it.” This evidence just shows what a majority of white men from that time period thought of African Americans and where they stand socially. Which can be represented when the Charles Mackay says, “we are of another race, and he is inferior.”

Read More
1096 Words | 5 Pages

Nearly a century following the Emancipation Proclamation, African Americans in the South still faced a world of inequality, segregation, and other forms of oppression. “Jim Crow” laws, state and local laws enforcing racial segregation, were prime examples of this. In 1954, the US Supreme Court put in place the “separate but equal” doctrine that formed the basis for state sanctioned discrimination, drawing attention to the plight of African Americans. During the years that followed, activists used nonviolent protest and civil disobedience to bring about change. Among these leaders were Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, two prominent activists during this time.

Read More
1219 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout the history of the United States of America, a struggle to reach racial equality has been evident. The case Plessy v Ferguson made separation by race, in other word segregation, legal. But, in order for this separation to occur, an equal position or place must be present, creating the phrase “separate but equal.” Even though equal accommodations must have been present for segregation to be legal, inferiority was still strongly implied due to the separation. Due to this court case, it caused the struggle to reach racial equality much more difficult due to the legalization of segregation.

Read More
937 Words | 4 Pages

Before, during, and long after the Civil War blacks were discriminated against in almost every form of life. They had to fight and be patient to be accepted as equals among their white counterparts; this process took form over a long period of time, and after many failures, blacks were truly equal in the eyes of the government. The thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendments which were passed in the late 1860’s were supposed to bring political, social, and economic equality for the blacks; however, this was not the case, while in some facets of life blacks obtained more freedoms they had to wait many years after these amendments were passed to be fully equal to whites. The thirteenth amendment abolished slavery in the United States.

Read More
1329 Words | 6 Pages

The ruling thus lent high judicial support to racial and ethnic discrimination and led to wider spread of the segregation between Whites and Blacks in the Southern United States. The great oppressive consequence from this was discrimination against African American minority from the socio-political opportunity to share the same facilities with the mainstream Whites, which in most of the cases the separate facilities for African Americans were inferior to those for Whites in actuality. The doctrine of “separate but equal” hence encourages two-tiered pluralism in U.S. as it privileged the non-Hispanic Whites over other racial and ethnic minority

Read More
268 Words | 2 Pages

The NAACP applauds the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision today holding that disparate impact claims are cognizable under the federal Fair Housing Act. The Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, reasoned that the dialect of the Fair Housing Act is significantly

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

The trial of the Scottsboro boys was a trial that was the cause of two white women accusing nine black men of raping them. Their appeals, retrials, and legal proceedings attracted the attention of the nation and produced to Supreme Court rulings in their favor. The Scottsboro boys trial demonstrates that nonconformity to unjust practices can lead to justice for all people because their trial triggered The Supreme Court ruling that had a major impact on the American system of laws for the right to adequate counsel, the ruling for the right to not be excluded from a jury based on race, and still has a continuing effect in our own time which affirms the principle of equal protection under the law. Their case not only saved them from the death sentence but also started up debate about equal protection under the law such as in the first Supreme Court ruling.

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

Dating back decades ago, racial disputes between different racial groups were very apparent in society in 20th century America. Numerous people of different backgrounds and cultures came to America for the American Dream, hoping to have a clean start and make a notable life. The case Plessy v. Ferguson challenged government officials to pursue a change in segregation and its immorality. The case debated the toleration of segregation in public facilities and provoked an uprising against the false ideology of “separate but equal”. The hearing of Brown v. Board of Education legalized the end of racial segregation in educational provisions.

Read More
393 Words | 2 Pages

Reconstruction era, which was followed by post-civil war, was meant to unite the states back together, reconstruct properties, and most importantly, abolish slavery in the South. Although the factors such as amendments legally freed former slaves, yet WRITE THESIS After the end of civil war in 1865, Reconstruction era, which was controlled by President Abraham Lincoln, appeared to quickly coalesce the Northern and Southern states. reconstruction amendments, which were approved between 1865 and 1870, played a huge role on giving legal rights to blacks and former slaves. 13th amendment constitutionally abolished slavery in 1865 and followed up by that, 14th and 15th amendment admitted equal citizenship, protection, and rights of suffrage despite the one’s race or skin color. Former slaves were no longer belongings of their owners.

Read More

More about Dred Scott Vs Stanford Case Analysis

Open Document