Everybody looks forward to the day they turn 16 and take their road test for their driver’s license. Getting a driver’s license is like a gateway into adulthood, a right of passage some people may say. It’s been like this for years, ever since the early 20th century, when it was mandated for licenses to be issued to anyone wishing to operate one or more motor vehicles. In spite of the fact that this has been the norm for quite a while, there are people out there who wish to place more stern regulations such as raising the driving age. Although implementing stricter driving laws may seem a better option, it doesn’t always have superior outcomes to its countering opinion. The driving age should stay the same because its preemptive strike to driver fatalities and its protection of basic individual driving experience. For starters, keeping the driver age the same takes a preemptive strike against driver fatalities. The people who want to change driving laws only see this option as a way to reduce car crash rates. They actually do, for 16 year olds. In Source 2 it states “... since the first …show more content…
With this law, it will minimize the chance of young driver’s DWI convictions. Out of 100 young drivers 63 of them received a DWI, with a valid license (Table 3.) This shows without supervision, more underage drinkers will be on the streets. However, think about the number of DWIs after they have reached the age of 21. At that time, they can legally drink, and not have to hide it or limit their amount of drinking. So establishing the raised driving age, again would be redundant. In conclusion, raising the driving age would be pointless. Delaying the inevitability of car crashes and dependence on another driver are just a few of the many reasons why we should not raise it. It’s just perfect the way it is. More could be said about this topic, but that would be just