ipl-logo

Duality Of Reputation In Dr Jekyll And Mr Hyde

569 Words3 Pages

Introduction: The concept of reputation is able to show how characters perceive themselves and are perceived by society. Robert Louis Stevenson's "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" and Herman Melville's "Bartleby the Scrivener" both go into the complexities of reputation, in very distinct ways. While "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" examines the duality of reputation as an aspect and as a reflection of one's inner nature, "Bartleby the Scrivener" dives into the consequences of rejecting societal expectations altogether. Through analysis, we can uncover the flaws of reputation in these works of fiction. Body:.. 1. What is the difference between a. and a. Duality of Reputation in "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" In Stevenson's novel, Dr. Jekyll maintains a respectable reputation in society being admired for his uprightness and philanthropy. However, beneath this veil lies his alter ego, Mr. Hyde, whose reputation is one of debauchery and violence. Dr. Jekyll's experimentations with his dual identity highlight the fragile nature of reputation, as he seeks to preserve his esteemed standing while indulging in his darker desires. One good example of this is when he says “And yet when I looked upon that ugly idol in the glass, I was conscious of no repugnance, rather of a leap of welcome. This, too, was myself.This, as I take it, was because all human beings, as we meet them, are …show more content…

What is the difference between a'smart' and a Consequences of Reputation: In both narratives, the characters' interactions with reputations have profound consequences. For Dr. Jekyll, the pursuit of maintaining his respectable facade ultimately leads to his downfall, as he is consumed by the darkness embodied by Mr. Hyde. Conversely, Bartleby's rejection of reputation results in his marginalization and eventual demise, highlighting the inescapable influence of societal norms. These contrasting outcomes underscore the complexities of reputation and its implications for individual identity and agency.

Open Document