ipl-logo

Dyadic Interpersonal Communication Analysis

1886 Words8 Pages

The aim of this assignment is to critique a face to face dyadic interpersonal communication between the author and another person in a natural conversation environment. I will look at the positive and negative, that relates theory and knowledge regarding the use of communication and interpersonal skills, and how and when to use verbal, non-verbal and Para-verbal communication within the dyadic interpersonal communication role play scenario. The author will also discuss the different models of Communication, and how they use a person centred approach to counsel and interact, and how best to handle and approach a situation in the correct manner. Discussion
Communication is our link to humanity. In its broadest sense, it is a process involving …show more content…

That’s because the interpersonal communication skill called listening requires constant mental energy and it easier to fake it. Technically, faking it involves using certain types of acknowledgement signals to give the sender the impression that we are paying attention when we are not.
Plus there are actually different types of listening. For example, you can listen passively, actively, or emphatically. One can listen to memorize or critically listen as a means of logic checking. So remember the words of Andre Gide, “Everything has been said before, but since nobody listens, we have to keep going back and begin again.
Before undertaking any communication, it is important to assess the client/patients level of knowledge and understanding of their situation, along with their physical and emotional states, as these could influence the starting point of conversion, the language that is used, and timing, and also the amount of information to be given at any one time, in order to absorb and acknowledge information. The use of open questioning rather than just facts, allows delivery of any information to be understood at the correct level and to remain relevant to their condition. Too much information cannot always be absorbed and can be misunderstood, or can result in complete …show more content…

These include: artifacts, haptics, kinesics, facial expressions, paralanguage, gestures, osculesics, chronemics, interpersonal distance, and body movements (Tubbs, and Moss, 2006).
If you don’t pay attention to these, it is like having the right eye shut and the left one looking left when it should be looking right. You miss so much. To make matters worse, many people tend to engage in a form of self-talk. This is a special type of self-talk in which the person speaks, but pays not attention to what to the other person. For example, that classic self-talker really doesn’t care whether their words are understood or confusing.
Without improving this verbal communication skill, effective counselling, therapy and group facilitation is essentially impossible. Questions are one of the most powerful methods of verifying and extracting information from another. The key is to ask the right question since most people answer them honestly. Many fail to recognize that questions have the power to same goal as persuasive statements. Rather than use statements, it’s better to use questions to encourage the person to discover the answer

Open Document