Both Jean-Baptiste Colbert (1619-1683) and Adam Smith (1723-1790) sought to increase
the wealth of their respective countries. How did their recommendations differ?
Adam Smith and Colbert both wanted to increase the wealth off their nation, but had
different economic ideas. Smith believes the "laissez- faire" idea that was based on
economic freedom, when Colbert believed in mercantilism that was based on restrictions
and control. However, both ideas were capitalistic and led to one result: improvement of
economy and wealth of the state.
Jean-Baptiste Colbert lived in the 15th century in France. All his life he served to his state
since his central principe was the wealth and economy of France. To keep France wealthy,
Colbert
…show more content…
Domestic tariffs were abolishes when foreign tariffs raised to encourage
people to by goods from mother country and developed France industries. Colbert created
guilds to check after the quality and quantity of goods poured. Also, in idea for a state to
be self sufficient it had to export more than it imported. Trade was a very important aspect
of mercantilism. Colonies were used to help the motherland. In Colbert's time the
government had full control on the economy. It was impossible to create an enterprise with
out the permission of the government, and since all the places were already taken, the
answer was most likely to be 'no'. Because there was not competition, the quality of
products wee not often good. This system worked well for France, but was very much
regulated by the government.
Adam Smith lived in 18th century. His ides of 'Laissez -Faire' was based on economic
freedom. He criticized guild and corporations because of their restrictions and privileged
companies because they didn't give companies full freedom and didn't let anyone on
market. He wanted a free competition that could protect costumes from high prices