ipl-logo

Egregious Sentencing Case Study

716 Words3 Pages

Judges often have the responsibility of sentencing an offender once guilt is determined. While judges have flexibility in deciding a sentence, their powers are limited to prevent egregious sentences. Multiple factors impact judge’s decisions on sentencing, several are the Eighth Amendment, statutory provisions, philosophical rationales, organizational considerations, presentence investigation reports, and the judge’s personal characteristics (Bohm & Haley, 2011). First, through the Bill of Rights, the Eighth Amendment protects individuals from cruel and unusual punishments (Bohm & Haley, 2011). Punishments must proportionately fit the crime or justice has failed and not fairly been served. Sentences should both reflect the sentences for …show more content…

Judges then must determine which type of punishment or combination of punishments to evoke from the five available: “fines, probation, intermediate punishment, imprisonment, and death” (Bohm & Haley, pp. 322, 2011). The offenses statute allows a sentence to be chosen from a specific range for each class of offenses. Thus, a judge could decide on highest possible fine and the minimum amount of time to be served or vice versa. Such freedom in judgment allows for custom sentencing to appropriately match the crime. Sentence lengths are further affected by the state law in regard to indeterminate sentencing, setting mandatory minimum and maximums, or determinate sentencing, a set amount of incarceration time. Determinate sentencing is further dissected into the categories of flat-time sentencing, mandatory sentencing, and presumptive sentencing. Offenders serve the exact sentence when flat-time sentencing is used, the sentence remains unaffected by other factors. Mandatory sentencing is set by statutes demanding that a minimum amount of time must be served before an offender becomes eligible for release. While presumptive sentencing is determined by statute other factors may increase the amount of time normally predetermined for an …show more content…

What exactly does the judge wish to accomplish with a sentence? Various motives exist such as retribution, incapacitation, deterrence, rehabilitation, and restoration (Bohm & Haley, 2011). Retribution is the most primal of the rationales, embodying the belief that wrongdoers deserve to have an equal amount of punishment in return to account for what they have done. The simple mindset of revenge is what motivates the rationale of retribution. However, incapacitation is more oriented to protecting society from further harm by separating the offender from the public. Likewise, a deterrence rationale seeks to protect society by attempting to prevent either the offender from committing similar misdeeds in the future or discouraging similar behavior from others. Moreover, by embracing a rationale of rehabilitation a judge believes that an offender, through undergoing certain tasks, may once again function as a member of society. Lastly, the restoration rationale solely focuses on attempting to make a victim or society whole, as they were before the

Show More
Related
550 Words | 3 Pages

The Three Strikes Law states that a penalty enhancement should be handed down to anyone who had previously been convicted of one or more supposedly serious or violent felonies. Under the same laws, an offender who had previously been convicted of a violent or serious felony, regardless of how diminished it may be, face the risk of double-sentencing under the guidelines of the second strike. On the other hand, a third- strike sentencing guideline is applied when an offender with two or more previous crimes is convicted. Under this guideline, a minimum of twenty-five years to life is applied. However, for the third-strike sentence to be passed, the previous crimes committed must be either violent or serious.

Read More
977 Words | 4 Pages

Although evidence is not provided to support this statement, it is inserted for the purpose of creating suspicion against the purpose and goals of evidence-based sentencing. This is built on more when Starr calls some of the systems “corporate products” (11.2) and stating that defendants may not understand the system. The image of corporate interests overpowering individuals is used to further the idea of a helplessness defendant. Changes are then proposed to the current system to make it “legitimate” (13.1), with the language used being a way to call the credibility of the current system into question. Although no changes for considered factors are proposed, it is suggested that factors “within the defendants control” (12.3) are considered instead.

Read More
180 Words | 1 Pages

In the United States, there are two primary models; Indeterminate and determinate sentencing. Indeterminate sentencing refers to blending decisions provided by the sentencing judge and later from a release authority so the actual time served can be determined. The judge will sentence offenders to indeterminate sentencing during the time of the sentence including the maximum or minimum amount of time that’s to be served. Once an offender serves the minimum amount of time they are qualified for a release by the parole board. However, the maximum sentence may have to be served by the offender if the parole board doesn’t grant an early release.

Read More
96 Words | 1 Pages

When a judge is considering sentencing to convict an offender specific deterrence should be more valuable than general deterrence but both are needed in the sentencing process. For the offender not to reoffend specific deterrence need to be embedded to determine the certainty of the crime. So the offender will not commit the same crime twice. Overall doing the sentencing process the judge have the right to use this offender specific deterrence to promote general deterrence to the public. This will allow other to fear the consequences and possibly punishment if they commit this specific crime.

Read More
329 Words | 2 Pages

When one thinks about the court systems and the way justice is served they see a system that is fair and just. A system that correctly provides punishment to the guilty party, and one that can discover the truth within the innocent party. On the surface level this appears to be true. Hundreds of thousands of people are incarcerated each year in the United States, which in reality provides a false sense of safety to citizens. While a large percentage of incarcerations are of guilty parties, according to a study in C. Ronald Huff’s book, Convicted But Innocent: Wrongful Conviction and Public Policy, approximately 100,000 innocent people are convicted every year.

Read More
1788 Words | 8 Pages

When an arrested person is found guilty, the judicature has a responsibility to come out with an appropriate punishment for the criminal on a case-by-case basis. There are four purposes of sanctions, which are deterrence, retribution, protection, rehabilitation and reformation. The Court of appeal was told that almost a quarter of all the sentences were too light, and the average sentence of imprisonment for rapist are said to be too lenient. The average imprisonment sentence for rape between 1999 and 2008 was just over five years; only 10 offenders out of 56 rape cases were sentenced to more than six years of imprisonment. Today, it was argued that the most appropriate imprisonment sentence for rapists is life imprisonment.

Read More
275 Words | 2 Pages

In order to discuss indeterminate versus determinate sentencing, we must first define them. Indeterminate sentencing is a form of “criminal punishment that encourages rehabilitation through the use of general and relatively unspecific sentences” (Schmalleger, 2015). An example of an indeterminate sentence would be a term of imprisonment of 1-10 years meaning an offender can serve no less than one year and no more than ten. The sentence is not determined. Determinate sentencing is another form of criminal punishment in which an offender is given a fixed term of imprisonment (Schmalleger, 2015).

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

The purpose of the United States Sentencing Commission is to “establish sentencing policies and practices for the federal criminal justice system that will assure the ends of justice by promulgating detailed guidelines prescribing the appropriate sentences for offenders convicted of federal crimes.” (Mustard 289) When it comes to the sentencing process, data is collected about the individual’s offense and criminal records to determine the offense level and criminal history score. Once they find those two scores that then indicate a range of sentence lengths. With certain circumstances, the judge can depart from the guidelines and issue a sentence that either exceeds the maximum or falls short of the minimum required by the guidelines. Once the sentencing range is determined, courts must adhere to the following constraints: “In determination of the sentence to impose within the guideline range, or whether a departure from the guidelines is warranted, the court may consider, without

Read More
945 Words | 4 Pages

Evaluate the effectiveness of sentencing and punishment as a means of achieving justice. The Australian criminal justice system is moderately effective in relation to sentencing and punishment as a means of achieving justice for offenders, victims and society. Sentencing and punishment is a key process utilised to enforce legislation, resolving and deterring criminal actions. Its effectiveness in upholding the interests of society is determined by the ability of enforcement to consider specific and general deterrence, retribution, rehabilitation and incapacitation.

Read More
1102 Words | 5 Pages

As a result of truth-in-sentencing practices, the State prison population is expected to increase through the incarceration of more offenders by keeping them incarcerated for longer periods of time. Abadinsky, Howard, Probation and Parole, Theory and Practice, St. John’s University, Pearson, Twelfth

Read More
1655 Words | 7 Pages

There is a fundamental lack of symmetry among the states. There is a federal schedule for sentencing, but each individual state differs. The scale of punishments would then determine ordinarily proportionate penalties for lesser offenses. It follows that if imprisonment is the most severe penalty, then proportionality will provide shorter terms of imprisonment and noncustodial penalties for lesser offenses. If the term of imprisonment for severe offenses is moderate, then short sentences and penalties such as probation will soon be reached on the scale of seriousness.

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

How Sentencing Affects the State and Federal Prison Systems The United States

Read More
1092 Words | 5 Pages

Deterrence Theory The deterrence theory is frequently linked to the idea of harsh, cruel punishment because the fear of consequences is a significant motivator in crime deterrence. As we learned from the book, the deterrence theory can be defined as the idea that crime rates should decrease if there is a higher likelihood of being arrested, convicted, and punished. When examining a theory, there are three main components: assumptions, concepts, and propositions. The term assumptions are also known to be the fact that is assumed to be true about a trait or behavior of individuals.

Read More
1279 Words | 6 Pages

In the formal criminal justice process, there are important decision makers that decide whether to keep the offender in the system or dismiss the suspect with no future consequences. Suppose a law was set in place

Read More
1048 Words | 5 Pages

There is a worldwide trend in the use of penal imprisonment for serious offenses as capital punishment has been renounced by an increasing number of countries. Harsh punishments include capital punishment, life imprisonment and long-term incarceration. These forms of punishments are usually used against serious crimes that are seen as unethical, such as murder, assault and robbery. Many people believe that harsher punishments are more effective as they deter would-be criminals and ensure justice is served. Opposition towards harsh punishments have argued that harsher punishments does not necessarily increase effectiveness because they do not have a deterrent effect, do not decrease recidivism rates and do not provide rehabilitation.

Read More

More about Egregious Sentencing Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document