She pays great attention to the papers revealing the roles of the two U.S. presidents, U.S. Senate and the State Department through Eleanor Roosevelt. The debates about the formation of the UN, UN Charter itself, Universal Declaration of Human rights, and first major human rights treaties were also crucial sources in her work. Anderson also incorporated information from newspapers such as the New York Times to stay current on the political events going on at the time. Secondary sources such as the works of other professors from different universities also allowed her to have a multi-perspective view during this time frame. Anderson’s meticulous incorporation of newspapers, documents, debates, and papers for other professors allowed some light to be shed on a topic not well examined at the time with complex but validated
Some say that history repeats itself. Over time, the plots of historical movements reoccur, but their motivations and effects vary. This can be applied to the analysis of the former US presidents Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson. There are some broad, unimportant similarities like how they were elected and the Constitution they upheld while in office, but these similarities are trumped by the social, political, and economic differences between the two. Therefore, the transition from Jefferson’s democratic ideals to the ideals posed by Andrew Jackson serves as a change in history.
In the 1950s, Texas was at the forefront of two major, but very different civil rights movements—the African-American movement and the Mexican-American movement. Fighting Their Own Battles by Brian Behnken describes and compares the separate battles for rights of the two movements. People in Texas knew what was happening and newspapers reported about the different events that occurred throughout the 1950s. In hindsight, and with the help of Behnken’s book, one is able to see the subtle influences of both civil rights movements in the Texas newspapers. At the time however, these differences in strategy between the African-American and Mexican-American movements were not so easily understood.
Oakes argues that as America went to war with itself, Lincoln’s antislavery politics and Douglas’s abolitionism gradually converged. James Oakes vivid political analysis chronicles the transformation of two of America’s greatest leaders as Lincoln embraces the role of the “radical” and Douglas embraces the role of the “republican” (104). The Radical and the Republican is set in the Antebellum period when the United States was divided by the great struggle between liberty and slavery in the North and the South. The Antebellum Era in American history was a time of economic, political, and social change.
Unlike many other historian’s accounts of the Lincoln and Douglas debates Allen C. Guelzo analyzes the debates by placing them into a balanced perspective, in The Debates That Defined America. For one reason, Guelzo was not bias in portrayal of either Lincoln or Douglas, their campaigns, or the political state of Illinois. Most importantly it was Guelzo’s attention to the entire state of Illinois. Along with its political happenings surrounding the time of the senatorial election and debates. Debates, as argued by Allen C. Guelzo, that would prove to be more influential in shaping american politics than deciding Illinois Senatorial Election of 1858.
President Dwight Eisenhower was a decorated war veteran in world war 2 before he became president of the United States. In January of 1953 president Eisenhower gave his first inaugural address to the citizens of the United States. Two foreign and two domestic policies will be analyzed in this paper. The policies were talked about in the inaugural address. This will show president Eisenhower's policy plans for his first four years in office.
In February of 1943 Martin Dies presented a report from the Dies committee, listing William Pickens as a person of interest for “being a member or sponsor of certain organizations which are purported to be Un-American”(Pt.4 1). Pickens, an author, orator, educator, and civil rights leader, was interviewed later that year by special agents of the FBI. The FBI asks Pickens questions about several organizations he may have been involved with over his years. Picken’s responses range from defending his involvement, to completely denying involvement with certain organizations. The FBI’s command of information relating to Picken's life, and Picken’s claimed difficulty remembering, remind us of the imperfection of memory and the sheer information advantage
In the journal article “ Andrew Jackson versus the Historians”, author Charles G. Sellers explained the various interpretations of Jackson, from the viewpoint of Whig historians and Progressive Historians. These interpretations were based on the policies of Jackson. The Whig historians viewed the former president in a negative way. They considered him arrogant, ignorant, and not fit for being president. Sellers pointed out that it was not just because of “Jackson’s personality…nor was it the general policies he pursued as president”
U.S. History in Context, http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/BT2336200108/UHIC?u=dove10524&xid=56050f49. Accessed 28 Jan. 2018. Drew, Elizabeth. Richard M. Nixon.
In the chronicles of the Eisenhower Library in Abilene, Kansas, and in different archives, colossal collections of essential source records on Eisenhower and his direct of the administration started to be discharged, a large portion of them in progressive volumes of the Department of State's important narrative volumes entitled The Foreign Relations of the United States . These records constitute a window through which to see the unpublicized parts of a president and administration whose open and private sides were close direct opposites. It is currently conceivable to pursue private journal notes in which Eisenhower recorded his encounters and elucidated his reasoning and sentiments, and comparable records by some of his nearby partners, and it is feasible for non specialists to investigate such matters through an expanding academic writing in the Eisenhower
In his novel The Making of the President 1960, Theodore H. White uses the “great federal census” to establish just how critical the changes in the American public demographic were to the election of the president. White considers the census of 1960 to be a marker of a new frontier in American culture and lifestyle, discussing how the move of Americans to suburbia and the growth of minority groups changed political affiliations. The 1960 census allows the reader to see exactly what circumstances in American society allowed for the seemingly impossible election of Kennedy to occur. White begins by discussing the population growth at the time the census was taken.
However, it can be argued that there are historical fallacies found in comparing the political theory and the lived reality of American citizens. I will outline how documents like “Freedom’s
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a large portion of Americans were restricted from civil and political rights. In American government in Black and White (Second ed.), Paula D. McClain and Steven C. Tauber and Vanna Gonzales’s power point slides, the politics of race and ethnicity is described by explaining the history of discrimination and civil rights progress for selective groups. Civil rights were retracted from African Americans and Asian Americans due to group designation, forms of inequality, and segregation. These restrictions were combatted by reforms such as the Thirteenth Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment, the Fifteenth amendment, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, etc. Although civil and political
FDR’s accomplishment strengthening the power of the Executive Office by signing over 3,720 executive orders is absent (Peters n.d.). More importantly the executive order directly after Pearl Harbor rounding up citizens into internment camps is missing in his analyzes. Or, President’s Truman’s decision to drop two atomic bombs is not a factor in Truman’s presidential analysis. The greatest achievement of all is the strength these two Presidents brought to this office, whether one likes it or
American History Education Reforms The definition as well as the specific parts of accurate American history is a highly debated topic- especially in regards to educating children on American history. In “Let’s tell the Story of All America’s Cultures” by Yuh Ji-Yeon gives her point of view on the controversial topic of the success of American history education. As the author is a Korean immigrant she has a special connection to this topic, and is writing this article to giver her opinion in the debate of reforming education in America. Ji-Yeon successfully persuades the audience that American history education in the United States is discriminatory by using her personal experiences and emotions as she informs the audience of a possible solution
