The Electoral College and Popular Vote are opposing ideas, but Electoral College stands stronger over popular vote. The college gives smaller states a bigger voice in an election. It prevents most chaos from states switching to a side they don’t support. Also, it is based on all state needs not just specific states with more population. The Electoral College has been around since the constitution was ratified and has been how we run are elections since then and has worked efficiently and Popular Vote messes up what are founding fathers created for are benefit. The Electoral College prevents only big states from only being fought over in elections, it gives a voice to small states to get their needs out there, and prevents chaos of states switching sides. In the first place, the states that have less population are benefitted by the college. It gives the smaller states a say in the matter with them not having as much population. As said from U.S representative Gene Green "Every citizen's vote should count in …show more content…
Said form Tara Ross a retired lawyer "The Electoral College provides yet another benefit: It reduces the incidence of fraud and error. Obviously, no system can completely" which means that the fraud that it reduces would cause less chaos during an election. This method prevents this for when a state that is heavily towards one side, but they have to vote for the opposite will make the people go against the popular vote elect. As said from Richard A. Posner a retired judge "Wyoming, the least populous state, contains only about one-sixth of 1 percent of the U.S. population, but its three electors (of whom two are awarded only because Wyoming has two senators like every other state) give it slightly more than one-half of 1 percent of total electoral votes" which means that not only big states run the