ipl-logo

Electoral College Vs Popular Vote Essay

578 Words3 Pages

The Electoral College and Popular Vote are opposing ideas, but Electoral College stands stronger over popular vote. The college gives smaller states a bigger voice in an election. It prevents most chaos from states switching to a side they don’t support. Also, it is based on all state needs not just specific states with more population. The Electoral College has been around since the constitution was ratified and has been how we run are elections since then and has worked efficiently and Popular Vote messes up what are founding fathers created for are benefit. The Electoral College prevents only big states from only being fought over in elections, it gives a voice to small states to get their needs out there, and prevents chaos of states switching sides. In the first place, the states that have less population are benefitted by the college. It gives the smaller states a say in the matter with them not having as much population. As said from U.S representative Gene Green "Every citizen's vote should count in …show more content…

Said form Tara Ross a retired lawyer "The Electoral College provides yet another benefit: It reduces the incidence of fraud and error. Obviously, no system can completely" which means that the fraud that it reduces would cause less chaos during an election. This method prevents this for when a state that is heavily towards one side, but they have to vote for the opposite will make the people go against the popular vote elect. As said from Richard A. Posner a retired judge "Wyoming, the least populous state, contains only about one-sixth of 1 percent of the U.S. population, but its three electors (of whom two are awarded only because Wyoming has two senators like every other state) give it slightly more than one-half of 1 percent of total electoral votes" which means that not only big states run the

Show More
Related
606 Words | 3 Pages

It gives the smaller states a voice, that could have been ignored if the popular vote only counted. The Electoral College helps the candidates and their party keep their campaign organized, if the they know the amount of votes they are looking for they can organize how much time they spend campaigning in each state (Advantages and Disadvantages of the Electoral College). Also helps keep a sense of stability, but setting up a 2 party system of voting, and also gives the states to make their own laws on voting and being able to make amendments accordingly (Advantages and Disadvantages of Electoral College). The Electoral College also helps avoid the chance of fraud occurring or national recounts (Advantages and Disadvantages of the Electoral College). Even though the system has many advantages it also has many disadvantages as

Read More
273 Words | 2 Pages

The electoral college is a way for selected individual’s to be chosen from each state to vote for the two-presidential candidate’s that have won popular vote for that state. Each state gets two votes for each senator and an additional vote for each member of the House of Representatives, which is based on state population. When votes are accumulated the candidate must get at least 270 votes from the Electoral College system. ( Levin- Waldman, 2012) There are some pros which are the electoral college system is efficient way to represent the country’s overall votes, favors states with smaller populations, this avoids them from having to recount the nations popular vote.

Read More
569 Words | 3 Pages

It prevents densely populated urban areas from dominating the election, as candidates need to appeal to a broader range of states and regions to secure the necessary electoral votes. The document “The Pros and Cons of the Electoral College” goes through a multitude of examples, one being, “Imagine a U.S. presidential election with no Electoral College. If only the popular vote mattered, candidates might concentrate their energies on densely populated metro areas like New York, Los Angeles and Chicago” (document 2). In other words, without the system in place, the alternate solution would be to count each vote individually. Ultimately, giving the larger states with the bigger population the

Read More
1090 Words | 5 Pages

There are positive effects of the Electoral College though, especially for small states such as Vermont. The Electoral College weighs the votes from smaller states more than larger ones because each state's electoral votes are equivalent to the number of House and Senate seats it has, thus giving one of those smaller state’s votes the power to really make a difference. The Electoral College also only acknowledges the majority vote of states and ignores the minority votes. Those who do not agree with everyone else are not represented at all, which is not

Read More
702 Words | 3 Pages

The washingtonpost.com says, “Every state is guaranteed at least one seat in the House and two in the Senate.” This shows that the Electoral College gives each state a fair vote according to their size. It also keeps larger states from having too much of an advantage over smaller

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

When the founding fathers were creating the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, there was a constant struggle between the states because they wanted to have power. With the Electoral College, these smaller states had more power because of the number of electoral votes. For example, in the article it states, “Compare that to ten of the small states by population in America; with only 6,000,00 voters combined, they get 32 electoral votes for president.” Even though the bigger states have a larger population, if the smaller states combine, they can have more electoral votes than the larger states but with a less population. One advantage of the Electoral College would be that the smaller states have a greater say in the

Read More
1048 Words | 5 Pages

politics, while others want to abolish the institution.” (Josephson, 2016) There are both pros and cons to the Electoral College as established by the founders. One reason to keep the Electoral College is highly populated areas of the united states may be more enticing to a candidate to visit than small rural towns. The time given to acquire the votes of these larger areas may leave the values and needs of the voters in smaller states without consideration. “One reason that some analysts support the electoral college is that it encourages candidates to pay attention to small states and not just get out the vote in big, populous states and cities”.

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

The Electoral College system assures balanced power between the states, puts the independent parties under control, grants balanced voting, and supports the major political parties. The Electoral College has proven itself to be very sufficient in determining the president and the vice president of the United States. Since this system has been successful since our Founding Fathers created it, there should be no reason as to why we should get rid of the Electoral

Read More
681 Words | 3 Pages

While a popular vote may appear simpler, the Electoral College has a deeply rooted purpose. The founding fathers of these United States feared a true democracy in which the population would directly decide governance, both

Read More
612 Words | 3 Pages

The electoral college also helps the small states have an opinion that actually is heard in the presidential election. In class, it was discussed that Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota together, though their combined population is less than that of Oklahoma, each of those states has three electoral votes, whereas Oklahoma just has seven votes. Going by electoral votes, a candidate would have a better chance at winning the election if they won over Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota versus Oklahoma. With the electoral college, a candidate could win over all thirty-nine small states and win the entire election. Though the candidate could be supported by less than a quarter of the population,

Read More
845 Words | 4 Pages

The Electoral College was put into the character for some elemental and very straightforward reasoning which are still applicable and important today. Our country was founded as a commonwealth, and along with having a king, the idea of a 'democracy ' was pretty much a apprehension to our founding fathers. their concept of a representative commonwealth in which people of high aspect and in good continuing would be elected to point in association and so on was established in the acceptance that these good men would do what was right without concern to amount and or personal or economical achievement. Forward the way, of development, much of that has dissipate, and the circumstances nation and economical advisability have come to leading a

Read More
999 Words | 4 Pages

The Electoral College is a good supported system because no one region can win an election on it’s own. “The Electoral College requires a presidential candidate to have transregional appeal. No region (South, North East, etc.) has enough electoral votes to elect a president (Posner)”. In addition, The Electoral College protects bigger states such as California from completely throwing elections

Read More
628 Words | 3 Pages

Without the electoral college these smaller states would not be as adequately represented in the election, due to a smaller population leaving a majority of these states potentially without a voice. On the other hand it keeps larger states from potentially ruling an entire election. The electoral college assumes that each state and citizens within that particular state are like minded in the way they want to be governed. That being said, if a large state who all thought the same came together they could potentially elect a president who would have more of their particular state's interests in

Read More
2026 Words | 9 Pages

One of the primary arguments to the credit of the Electoral College is that a winner can be more easily determined in the Electoral College vs the popular vote. The Electoral College has a system for handling ties (The House of Representatives), and is much more accurate than the popular vote. It is not possible to attain 100% accuracy when the voting population totals above 126 million, making for difficult logistics and guaranteed recounts, whereas determining a majority in a state to assign electors is trivial in comparison, thus “saving the nation ‘from the effects of an ambiguous outcome‘”(Hardaway 127). As well as being highly accurate in deciding a winner, the Electoral College also ensures that political candidates must campaign in nearly every state because of the power of each to affect the election, ensuring that every state actively participates in the political process. In addition, the winner-take-all system, also known as “unit rule”, while not always necessarily representative of the popular vote, “the electoral college and unit rule provide decisive majorities that lend stability to our presidential election system” (Josephson, Ross 162).

Read More
975 Words | 4 Pages

Current day, it has little relevancy since it was originally included to address also issues that do not exist anymore, including not trusting the decision to be made by the American people. When originally founded, they wanted to ensure the President was decided by electors who had the knowledge to make what they felt was informed decisions. Now, many people feel as though too much power is given to the electoral votes, and that their vote does not mean as much as someone in a different state. As it stands, many feel that small states are largely misrepresented and given too much power since the votes are not divided equally among the population. In fact, if the Electoral College system was not in the Constitution, it would undoubtedly be removed due to it being unconstitutional, because using the electoral votes violates the principle of one-person, one-vote.

Read More

More about Electoral College Vs Popular Vote Essay

Open Document