ipl-logo

Four Elements Of Procedure To Succeed In A Negligence Case

893 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: General principles applicable to the tort of negligence

What are the four elements of proof necessary for a plaintiff to succeed in a negligence case?
The four elements of proof necessary for a plaintiff to succeed in a negligence case are: (i) Duty of care, (ii) Breach of duty, (iii) Injury, (iv) Causation
(i)Duty of care: Duty can be defined as a legal obligation the defender or a wrongdoer owes to the plaintiff. When the law recognizes a relationship between two parties, the duty of care arises. These parties are called defendant and the plaintiff. Because of this relationship, the defendant has a legal obligation to act in a certain way toward the plaintiff. For e.g. Providers have a duty to treat their patients in a required medically manner, however, they must warn their patients of the side-effects or risk associated with a particular treatment. In case of a conflict, a “Judge” usually determines if defendant owed a duty of care to a plaintiff.
(ii)Breach of duty: A defendant breaches the duty of care by failing to exercise reasonable care in fulfilling the duty towards the plaintiff. If this happens, the plaintiff must show the evidence of the facts of the case along with the testimony from an expert witness regarding whether the standard was met. Occasionally, a plaintiff is allowed to introduce medical treaties as evidence to prove the standard of …show more content…

Until and unless persons are adjudged dangerous to themselves or others, indefinite confinement without treatment violates their right to due process and the officials responsible for such confinement can be personally liable under civil rights law. Psychiatric patients have the constitutional rights to adequate food, shelter, clothing, medical care, reasonable freedom from physical restraints, safe physical conditions, rehabilitation or training needed for their diagnosis. Hospital officials can be held personally liable if they fail to observe these

Show More
Related

Duncan V. Scottsdale Medical Imaging Ltd: Case Study

776 Words | 4 Pages

From: Ashlee Nong HCA 340 To: Professor Schipske 06 October 2017 Duncan v. Scottsdale Medical Imaging Ltd., Supreme Court of Arizona 70 P.3d 435, 2003 1. The complete title and citation of the case: Duncan v. Scottsdale Medical Imaging Ltd., 70 P. 3d 435 (2003). 2. Explain which court decided this case: Supreme Court of Arizona decided this case. The Court of Appeals maintained the trial judge's decisions, yet the Supreme Court concurred with Duncan that the Medical Malpractice Act arrangement which bars misbehavior claims in view of battery abuses the Arizona Constitution's assurance for the privilege to sue.

Read More

Greystone Parks Psychiatric Hospital Case Study

525 Words | 3 Pages

In addition to, some Consumers are not aware of their illness. Never-the-less, in the State of New Jersey people who are deemed as a danger to themselves or others due to a mental illness is involuntarily committed to this facility by a judge who has written the orders. At “Greystone Parks Psychiatric Hospital” there are certain protocols that must be followed before people are admitted into this facility. The protocol is as follows, patients stay in either the A1/B1 units.

Read More

Hsm 542 Week 4 You Decide Case Summary

280 Words | 2 Pages

this Court’s order to respond in full to the Hospital’s discovery requests and produce the requested documents. Additionally, Defendant failed to respond to the Hospital’s attempts to confer on this Motion. III. Conclusion and Prayer Defendant’s bad faith behavior implies that he considers himself to be above the requirements of the Rules of Civil Procedure and the authority of this Court.

Read More

Pros And Cons V. Defendant Medic East

826 Words | 4 Pages

11. Similarly the reasoning for the refusal to disclose Dr. Rigney’s radiological reviews is equally misleading. While Plaintiff appreciates that Defendant Medic East has advised the court that Dr. Rigney will not be called as a witness in the instant matter, an admission Plaintiff intends to enforce should Defendant Medic East suddenly change their mind later, it does not change the fact that said reports were supplied to Dr.

Read More

Cleveland V. Perry: A Case Study

1223 Words | 5 Pages

“To prove the causation element, the injured plaintiff must show a direct relationship between the alleged misconduct and the injury sustained from the misconduct.” (Morissette, 2014) Tammy Cleveland can show a legally sufficient relationship between the breach of duty and the injury that is is referred to as proximate causation. But for the fact Dr. Perry refused to check the vitals of Michael Cleveland he misdiagnosed him, which in turn caused his death. Dr. Perry can also be charged with negligence per se for “failing to obey the statute and adhering the standard of care expected of him as a doctor”. (Dudzik, 2015) He neglected his patient and the pleas from his family, ultimately shortening his life.

Read More

Kent Carey Case

437 Words | 2 Pages

In order to maintain a claim regarding medical malpractice, a plaintiff must show 1) a duty owed to the plaintiff by the defendant (inherent, voluntary, or statutory) 2) a breach of the duty by allowing the conduct to fall below the standard of care, and 3) a compensable injury proximately caused by the defendant’s breach of duty. Carey was able to establish an inherent duty was owed to him by Connelly but was not able to provide evidence to support his claim about the breach of duty by conduct or that his injury was caused solely by the conduct of

Read More

Intentional Tort: Court Case Study

556 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore, mike caused further harm to Julian. For the court to allow David to recover against Julian’s dad, on what tort theory will David’s attorney rely? 
Punitive damages are awarded only for intentional torts, when the court determines that the tortfeasor deserves an additional punishment beyond just compensating the plaintiff for the harm done to him or her. Therefore, David’s attorney will rely on intentional torts to

Read More

Summary Of Solitary Nation

800 Words | 4 Pages

Under article 8 of the Bill of Human Rights it states, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted (The Eighth Amendment).” Placing a mentally ill inmate inside four walls away from any social interaction and medical attention is in fact cruel. As said by a federal judge, putting a mentally ill person in segregation is the “equivalent of putting an asthmatic in a place with little air to breathe (Wallace 11).” A mentally ill person needs help, not a poor environment in which they won’t get any better. Not only does solitary confinement mess with the mind, but it inflicts inmates to self-harm in any way possible.

Read More

Grocery And False Arrest: Case Study

125 Words | 1 Pages

Plaintiff states that MOS kicked his legs causing plaintiff to fell on his face into a puddle of urine, rock salt, and gravel. Plaintiff states that he was taken to hospital for treatment. Plaintiff accepted an

Read More

Estelle V. Gamble Case Study

375 Words | 2 Pages

In that case, the Supreme Court held that prison staff (whether doctors or officers or any others) violated the Eighth Amendment if they were deliberately indifferent to the serious medical needs of prisoners.

Read More

Tort Case Study: Health Care Law

1368 Words | 6 Pages

Health Care Law: Tort Case Study Carolann Stanek University of Mary   Health Care Law: Tort Case Study A sample case study reviewed substandard care that was delivered to Ms. Gardner after having sustained an accident and brought to Bay Hospital for treatment. Dr. Dick, a second-year pediatric resident, was on that day in the ED and provided care for Ms. Gadner. Dr. Moon, is the chief of staff and oversees the credentialing of all physicians at Bay Hospital.

Read More

Explain The Term Duty Of Care

56 Words | 1 Pages

The term duty of care is defined by the legal obligation to safeguard others from harm whilst in your professional care; using your services, or exposed to your activities. In broader terms it is to ensure morally and professionally that the person within your care remains safe, free from harm, whilst complying with the individual’s

Read More

Mental Health Act 2007 Essay

796 Words | 4 Pages

The Mental Health Act 2007 allows people with a mental disorder to be admitted to hospital, detained and treated without their consent – either for their own health and safety, or for the protection of other people (Mentalhealthcare.org.uk, 2015). Under this legislation a person can be admitted and given treatment against their wishes. Detainees are always told their rights so that they do not feel as though they are being punished; they also have the right to appeal. To be able to detain a person, they must be struggling to care for themselves and a risk to both themselves and others. Additionally, it must be the last resort because all other forms of treatment have been tried to no avail.

Read More

Bourhill V Young Case Summary

1153 Words | 5 Pages

The law of tort applies duties of the civil law in respect to a wide range of behavior which are relevant to a business activity, this area of law serves a very important role for consumers and those are doing business with them. As stated above in order to have a sure fire claim when claiming under the tort of negligence it is compulsory to fulfill the three requirement, the first requirement is the " duty of care " it is stated that whether the defendant owes the plaintiff a duty of care, is definitely a question of the law. it is always onus that the plaintiff establish the existence of a duty of care, but usually in most cases it is very straightforward to establish a duty of care, as long as it is provided that the relationship between parties falls within the duty of care for example a doctors owes a duty of care to his/her patients, or motorist owe a duty of care to the other road users, even architects owe a duty of care to the people who are occupying the specific building, these are just few examples of owing a duty of care. if the relationship between the parties does not fall within the established duties of care, than the plaintiff needs to be able to show the 2 things which are (1) '' it was reasonably foreseeable that the defendant act or omission could cause harm to someone in the plaintiff's position ", which means that it the plaintiff must be able to show that during the time of the incident it was reasonably foreseeable that the defendant's code of conduct could cause harm to someone in the plaintiff's position.

Read More

Essay On Negligence

1033 Words | 5 Pages

In this essay I will first of all discuss what negligence is and what it consists of. When there is a breach of legal duty where the plaintiff has incurred some sort of damage we call this negligence. Negligence occurs when a person has carried out an unreasonable act which a prudent person would not have carried out in that particular situation. To make sure that negligence is maintained there must be some exceptions to it such as if negligence were to take place there must be a breach of that duty, the damage that has occurred must be reasonable foreseeable. There also must be a common link between the damage that took place and the breach.

Read More

More about Four Elements Of Procedure To Succeed In A Negligence Case

Related Topics

Open Document