ipl-logo

Elie Wiesel Acceptance Speech Analysis

476 Words2 Pages

In 1986 Nobel Peace Prize winner, Elie Wiesel, makes two strong statements in his acceptance speech. Wiesel was 15 years old when he entered the camp in Auschuitz. His mom and little sister got killed as soon as they got to the gates. His father went into the gates with him the first time. He moved in January 1945 to Buchenwald in a cattle car. After he got out of the camps he later went to become an amazing writer and inspiring speaker. He wrote in his book about all the things that he experienced and wished he could have changed things. “Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” Wiesel is saying that if your silent then the oppressor thinks it’s ok to keep being mean. When you stand up for the victim it shows that someone actually cares about what really going on. If your friend is getting bullied go stand up for them and show the bully you’re not afraid. …show more content…

And that is why I swore never to be silent when ever and where ever human beings endure suffering and humiliation.” The Allied Forces knew what was going on in all the camps, and they didn’t do anything to try to help. If they would have stood up and said something then maybe millions of people wouldn’t have died. He don’t want anyone to ever suffer the way he did and the way people did around him. Standing up for something could change many lives and help others. Elie Wiesel’s speech is still in memory because today some of these things are happening. Everyone today is saying all muslims are terrorist and they need to leave the country. Wiesel was saying that race, religion, and that stuff doesn’t really matter it’s the way people treat you. Terrorism is getting bad and people need to stand up and try to stop the killing that’s starting to happen. Being neutral isn’t the way to be in any situation. So stand up and let your voice be heard because it might change

Show More
Related
116 Words | 1 Pages

As the young man was sent to many concentration camps he saw many things even upon a young age. His own people killed in front of him his own family too. But he survived through all the harsh condition the Nazi leaders and soldiers gave him. Through all the abuse or little food that was given and through all the disease that was sent by.

Read More
950 Words | 4 Pages

Weisel also states, “There is so much injustice and suffering crying out for our attention: victims of hunger, of racism, and political persecution, writers and poets, prisoners in so many lands governed by the Left and by the Right”. Weisel makes a point that if societies do not start to speak out against unethical actions, the people suffering will never be able to come out of the darkness and will always be confused on what action to take next. For this reason, Elie Wiesel makes a statement and a call to action that without the help of the people surrounding them, the individuals who are mistreated will never be free of their

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

And that is why I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation.” In this quote Ellie is talking about silence can get you in more trouble than you think. We shouldn’t be silent in bad times like the Holocaust. We should speak up when words need to be spoken. Bad times aren’t the right times to be silent.

Read More
565 Words | 3 Pages

Elie Wiesel had an interesting story, he felt the need to tell. At the age of 15, was sent to a concentration camp. Wiesel was sent to Buna Werke labor camp, with his father where they were forced to work under deplorable, inhumane conditions. They were transferred to other Nazi camps and force marched to Buchenwald where his father died after being beaten by a German soldier, just three months before the camp was liberated. Wiesel’s mother and younger sister Tzipora also died in the Holocaust.

Read More
470 Words | 2 Pages

2. He was a nice guy out of the concentration camps. 2. He would watch millions of people die in gas chambers over the five years he was there, it would not mind him, watching people suffer or die, or watching their teeth turn into gold bars. 2.

Read More
1380 Words | 6 Pages

Buergenthal tells a story that is not similar to Elie Wiesel, although they tell of the same event. This book is not intended to expose the horrors of the camps, but to rather show how a child was able to conquer all those horrors and come out on the other side, willing to stand up for anything that seems unjust. It is because of people like Thomas Buergenthal that violations of human rights are taken more seriously than ever, which is expected. From beginning to end, it is inspiring and allows the true resiliency of all children to shine

Read More
704 Words | 3 Pages

His first night in the concentration camp destroyed him, crumbling down the wall of innocence until there was nothing left. Everything he had once known and loved, taken away in the blink of an eye. As Wiesel put it, “Never

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

In his 1986 speech he says, “ Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. ”(118) When he talks about this idea he refers to what happened in the Holocaust. With the multitudes of German towns and cities knowing of the existance of the camps, and a general idea of who, and what was inside them.

Read More
439 Words | 2 Pages

The entire world was so ignorant to such a massacre of horrific events that were right under their noses, so Elie Wiesel persuades and expresses his viewpoint of neutrality to an audience. Wiesel uses the ignorance of the countries during World War II to express the effects of their involvement on the civilians, “And then I explain to him how naive we were, that the world did know and remained silent. And that is why I swore never to be silent when and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation” (Weisel). To persuade the audience, Elie uses facts to make the people become sentimental toward the victims of the Holocaust. Also, when Weisel shares his opinion with the audience, he gains people onto his side because of his authority and good reputation.

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

This later on as a big effect on Wiesel and how he survived the horrifying experience in the camps. When wiesel was first deporeted to the camp he first arrived at Buna Werke labor camp, a subcamp of Auschwitz III-Monowitz where him and his father were separated from his sisters and mother. They were forced to work under shameful, cruel conditions. Then they were transferred to other Nazi camps and on their way to the finally camp was forced to march to Buchenwald where his father died after being beaten by a German soldier, just three months before the camp was liberated. Wiesel’s

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

When the young boy asks, “Who would allow such crimes to be committed? How could the world remain silent”, (paragraph 5) again the audience is prompted to emotionally respond. They have to realize that it was all of them, all of us, who remained silent and that this silence must never happen again. Wiesel demonstrates a strong use of pathos throughout his speech to encourage his audience to commit to never sitting silently by while any human beings are being treated

Read More
483 Words | 2 Pages

This allows the audience to feel the pain when he talks about his time as a Jewish prisoner, and how it reflected back to indifference. When his people needed help so many turned their heads so they wouldn’t have to acknowledge the problem because it didn’t affect their personal daily living. This became a serious problem during the war, indifference.

Read More
1129 Words | 5 Pages

Wiesel pinpoints the indifference of humans as the real enemy, causing further suffering and lost to those already in peril. Wiesel commenced the speech with an interesting attention getter: a story about a young Jewish from a small town that was at the end of war liberated from Nazi rule by American soldiers. This young boy was in fact himself. The first-hand experience of cruelty gave him credibility in discussing the dangers of indifference; he was a victim himself.

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

Elie Wiesel Rhetorical Speech Analysis Elie Wiesel, a holocaust survivor and winner of a Nobel peace prize, stood up on April 12, 1999 at the White House to give his speech, “The Perils of Indifference”. In Wiesel’s speech he was addressing to the nation, the audience only consisted of President Clinton, Mrs. Clinton, congress, and other officials. The speech he gave was an eye-opener to the world in his perspective. Wiesel uses a variety of rhetorical strategies and devices to bring lots of emotion and to educate the indifference people have towards the holocaust. “You fight it.

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

Wiesel’s speech shows how he worked to keep the memory of those people alive because he knows that people will continue to be guilty, to be accomplices if they forget. Furthermore, Wiesel knows that keeping the memory of those poor, innocent will avoid the repetition of the atrocity done in the future. The stories and experiences of Wiesel allowed for people to see the true horrors of what occurs when people who keep silence become “accomplices” of those who inflict pain towards humans. To conclude, Wiesel chose to use parallelism in his speech to emphasize the fault people had for keeping silence and allowing the torture of innocent

Read More

More about Elie Wiesel Acceptance Speech Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document