ipl-logo

Elizabethan Poor Law

700 Words3 Pages

The Act for the Relief of the Poor, primarily known as the Elizabethan Poor Law, was passed in 1601. It was required in order to establish a law system for the poor in England and Wales. In the earlier years, several laws were passed to deal with the increasing poverty. There was an official record maintained for those who fell into the category for ‘poor’ (Bloy, 2002). This category was further divided into different categories of poor, which included: those who would work but could not, those who could work but would not, and lastly, those who were too old, ill or young to work. A compulsory local poor law tax was imposed on each wage earner making them responsible for the welfare of the poor.
Finally in 1601, all the previous laws were assembled into one and a few provisions were made. A compulsory poor rate was to be levied on every parish, an 'Overseers' of relief was to be created, the poor were to be offered work, and a poor relief rate was collected from property owners. There were two supervisors of the Poor elected every Easter. They worked out the amount of money required and set the poor rate accordingly, distributed food or money to the poor, collected the poor rate from the property owners and supervised the poor-house. The Act was passed to provide relief to the …show more content…

It was called the Poor Law Amendment Act. It was passed to cut down finances as limited funds were available. This New Act distinguished between ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ poor (Raphael, 2011) . The undeserving poor were those who were capable of working but were unwilling to work. They were given ‘indoor’ relief by being forced to work in workplaces and were given basic necessities in exchange of their service. The deserving poor included the orphans, the sick and the disabled. They were unable to work and were given ‘outdoor’ relief. It included giving them money and other necessities in exchange of no

Show More
Related
714 Words | 3 Pages

What lead the colonist to turn against their mother country that some loved so much? The mother country was England and they wanted the new world to stay with them because they were making a lot of money of the colonist. They were taxing the colonies where ever they could so they could take more money away from them and to try to keep them in check. There were many different taxations that were forced upon the colonies that made the angry with their mother country and they were the sugar act, currency act, stamp act, quartering act, declaratory act and the tea act. All of these acts were not forced upon the colonist at once.

Read More
416 Words | 2 Pages

After the French and Indian War, the British set out to reform the relationship with the new colonies, (Shultz,n.d.). They issued a number of tax acts on the colonists to raise money. These acts were met with great opposition from the colonists, as they felt it was interfering with the liberties they had fought so hard for. Acts such as the Sugar Act, the Quartering Act, and the Stamp caused the colonists great frustration and this lead to rebellion toward the Crown. The Sugar Act would lower the taxes sugar and molasses, but much to the dismay of the colonists Europe had increased its enforcement of these taxes, (Shultz,n.d.).

Read More
158 Words | 1 Pages

The Elizabethan Era had many rules and laws, so many that sometimes they were hard to keep track of. The capital offenses included robbery, larceny/theft, rape, and arson (Harrison). The more frequently committed crimes included theft, begging, cutpurses, adultery, debtors, poaching, forgery, fraud, and dice-cogging (Elizabethan Crime). In a desperate effort to control how the less fortunate and homeless behaved, Parliament passed the Poor Laws, which made it illegal to beg for food and money (Harrison). These laws went so far as to make it illegal to live on the streets (Crime and Punishment).

Read More
699 Words | 3 Pages

A numerous amount of people were living on the poverty line. $2000 was considered the poverty line and 60% below the poverty line.(Doc 9). There was not enough money flow to keep people

Read More
440 Words | 2 Pages

When Britain ended salutary neglect, the colonists’ got mad. It was a major turning point in the history of America because it allowed Britain to gain control over all of the American colonies, and make laws and tax the people however they wanted to. This helped Britain get out of debt after the French and Indian War. Before Britain ended salutary neglect, colonists’ were allowed to do whatever they wanted to.

Read More
1005 Words | 5 Pages

In a diagram from 1789, it shows that the First and Second Estates made up only a small percentage of the population, yet they owned ten times that amount in land, and paid no taxes. Meanwhile, the majority of the population, made up by the Third Estate, were taxed profusely and owned little land in comparison (Doc 2). The inequality between the estates and the extent to which the Third Estate was abused because of their social status was clear . This is portrayed in an illustration where the Third Estate was trampled by the taxes forced upon them by their social superiors (Doc 7). They were in no state to pay taxes or tithes to the church, and this mandatory tariff left little money for their own needs.

Read More
1173 Words | 5 Pages

A strong urge for a spirit of donation to the poor was exceeding imposed, he even took it privately to donate. Yet these private efforts were not sufficient to alleviate the amplitude of poverty in the

Read More
1493 Words | 6 Pages

Another example showing the rules and regulations established for the poor is from Cardinal Richelieu in his unofficial statement on poverty. Richelieu said “We desire that in every town in our kingdom rules and regulations for the poor should be established, so that not only all those of the said town but also of the neighboring areas should be confined and fed, and those who are able to do so should be employed on public works” (doc. 8). In this Richelieu is saying that a society with rules and regulations for the poor is better off. He is saying that the poor need to be

Read More
628 Words | 3 Pages

However, how much a person pays for food is paid for by “whatever cash is left after the unyielding bill[s] are paid”. Usually a poor working class citizen, will not have much after the bills are paid. The bills that the poor have to pay for their families “can soak up 50 to 75 percent of a poor family’s earnings”. This leaves these families with very little money to pay for their food. They now have a flexible amount of money to pay for food, but the amount that they have may not be as

Read More
1185 Words | 5 Pages

Readers can infer that poor people were deprived of food and possibilities because of the strong use of pathos and imagery. Also, the substandard jobs were reserved for the poor because they were ineligible of equal opportunities because they were deemed uneducated. Americans still view poor people as being uneducated and wrongfully inferring that as the cause of their poverty. This incorrect thinking leads poor people to have less rights than others because they have to

Read More
2122 Words | 9 Pages

People in poverty were unable to afford the

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

There are so many examples of poverty in this book, another Big example is Christmas, like when they’d pick up used trees from the roadside and wrap small toys and trinkets in wrapping paper discarded by other

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the human history, people always help each other, as it is a part of a human nature. In pre-civilized world, any migrant tribe look after of the older and physically weaker members of their group by sharing food. The Ancient Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, Chinese, and the Islamic cultures developed a more sophisticated assistance for their impoverished citizens. Charities along with governmental relief came in forms of food, clothing, monetary allowances, hospitals, and housing for the elderly and orphans.

Read More
1805 Words | 8 Pages

In this paper I will be arguing against Peter Singer’s views on poverty, which he expresses in his paper “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”. Singer argues that all people with wealth surplus to their essential needs are morally obligated to prevent the suffering of those in dire situations. I will argue that you can not hold people morally obligated to prevent the suffering of others, and that people can only be held morally obligated to prevent suffering that they themselves caused. To begin, we will look at Singers beliefs and arguments regarding poverty and the responsibility of people to help those in need. Singer’s first arguments revolves around a girl named Dora, who is a retired schoolteacher, who is barely making a living writing

Read More
1038 Words | 5 Pages

Social class played a key role in the Elizabethan Age; without social hierarchy society would have fallen apart, the people did not know of anything else other than the role of classes. Each class had different situations of life, some were wealthy and had nice homes while others were poor and living off of the streets. The class rankings were given to each individual by situations such as birth, fame, wealth, and known skills(“Elizabethan Era.”). One could only move up a class by the Queen's approval, obtaining sudden wealth, going into debt, losing your job, and many other specific conditions(“Elizabethan Era - The Lost Colony.”). For instance, marriage between two people from separate classes could alter social class and was often frowned upon.

Read More

More about Elizabethan Poor Law

Related Topics

Open Document