By July 1862, the Union army was having an extremely difficult time gaining any victories or advances in the Civil War. After many, many losses to the Confederate Army, Lincoln was desperate to find a way to recruit soldiers that would be of help to the Union. After the bombardment of Fort Sumter, Lincoln’s fist concern was the preservation of the United States. Amrita Chakrabarti Myers, associate professor of history in the Indiana University Bloomington College of Arts and Science, stated that, “Lincoln was clear that this was not about slaves. It was about the Union and whatever he needed to do to save the Union, he would do.” Yet in order to preserve the Union, Lincoln knew that he would ultimately have to abolish slavery. He …show more content…
In September of 1862, after a draft of the Emancipation Proclamation was released to the public New York Evening Post Editor, William Cullen Bryant editorialized: "Its puts us right before Europe.. It brings back our traditions; it animates our soldiers with the same spirit which led our forefathers to victory under Washington; they are fighting today, as the Revolutionary patriots fought, in the interests of the human race..” Abolitionists rejoiced at the Proclamation, for it finally showed a glimpse of a possibility that one day slavery in the United Sates of America would be non-existent. However, in Eric Coker’s article, Acclaimed historian discusses Lincoln and slavery, he states …show more content…
[That] Union leaders realized that giving the runaway slaves back to their owners was not an option; it only aided the Confederates cause, [and] by not returning them, the Union not only gained a source of labor - and, later, soldiers - they denied the source of labor to the enemy.”
Levine’s comment really confirms that the Emancipation Proclamation and every movement to abolish slavery during the Civil War wasn’t actually to grant the slaves freedom, but rather to weaken the Confederate army and even the Confederate’s labor system. It only appeared to to be such a large movement for anti-slavery because they coincidentally benefitted from these strategic movements by the Union. In addition, the Emancipation Proclamation gained mixed emotions from the northern states, an article in the New York Times recalled that abolitionists “looked glum, and grumbled with dissatisfaction because the unexpected proclamation was only given on account of military necessity.” Yet, in the same article Henry Ward Beecher was quoted as saying “the Proclamation may not free a single slave, but it gives liberty a moral