ipl-logo

Emile Durkheim's Labeling Theory

961 Words4 Pages

Calling each other names since middle school is not out of the norm. But, what happens when those labels negatively impact your life? Labeling someone in a negative way can dramatically change that person’s mindset. Labeling someone can lead to having those terms become true through the change of behavior and social groups. The book Labeling Theory: A Critical Examination explains the effects of labeling theory as “essentially, two effects come from labeling. On the one hand, an individual’s social situation is changed; on the other, his self-image” (Knutsson, 1977). Labeling theory focuses on the reactions and labels of society. Those labels and reactions result in criminal behavior. Labeling theory has been proven that there is a correlation …show more content…

Durkheim’s work “shifted attention from how society generated nonconforming behavior to how and why society created criminals through societal reaction” (Berk, 2015). However, the societal perspective did not gain attention till the late 1960’s. During this time the direction changed towards “a focus on societal interaction” (Berk, 2015). Like stated previously, in labeling theory, there are two components: the societal reaction and the person’s self-image. An intense form of societal reaction is for example a prison. Many early criminologists noted that a prison was a “breeding ground for crime” (Lilly, Cullen, & Ball, 2015). Lombroso supported this concept by explaining “the degrading influences of prison life and contact with vulgar criminals…cause criminals who have committed their initial offenses with repugnance and hesitation to develop later into habitual criminals” (Lilly, Cullen, & Ball, 2015). For Lombroso those negative labels have influenced individuals to adapt those labels into criminal behaviors. Williem Bonger also pointed out that young individuals who have in the past, committed petty crimes are being brought up to be elaborate criminals later out in

Show More
Related
1325 Words | 6 Pages

The labeling effect is very important because it is determines people’s way to deal and understand things. The people who live outside of the so-called “poor/crime zoon” are hard to understand the people who live inside of these zoon, that is because the other function of the labeling effect, to create gaps between people from different social groups. When people who labelled by the same environment live together, they can create their own rules which are suitable for the corresponding environment. Most of people will qualitative some behaviors as criminal behaviors however, for the people who come from the “crime zoon” these

Read More
340 Words | 2 Pages

In the reading, “The Saints and the Roughnecks” by William J. Chambliss, the ideas of labels and their consequences are discussed. Chambliss observes two groups of high school boys (the Saints and the Roughnecks) for two years and notices how although they are both engaged in behaviors known as deviant, only the Roughnecks seem to be labeled as deviant by their community. The question Chambliss then raises is “What was the cause of this disparity?”. The answer lies in that the group was labeled as deviant due to numerous factors (i.e. social class, visibility due to lack of funds, behavior toward authority, etc.), and because of this, the community could never see them as otherwise, and the boys became a self-fulfilling prophecy. Although

Read More
1006 Words | 5 Pages

The labeling effect is when somebody comes out of prison or jail, but are still seen as a criminal because they went to prison or jail. The law allows former criminals to be deny for housing or jobs on the basis that they were in prison or jail (144). This leads to people who are labeled to have a hard time getting jobs, a home, and being part of the community as they are seen as bad people (141). Since the War on Drugs puts so many poor black people in prison, we have make people with already difficult lives, lives more difficult. This could potentially lead to the person doing more crime as they may feel like they have little choice on what to do since everyone sees them as a

Read More
888 Words | 4 Pages

Labels have an impact on us all because of how we identify people with labels, either negatively or positively. The novel Flawed by Cecelia Ahern helps you better understand how others view you and how you view yourself after being labeled. During the book Celestine had to relearn about herself after being labeled ”Flawed” and having a whole society treat her differently because of being ”Flawed”. Looking at Flawed shows how labels have a significant impact on people's identity, bias, and prejudice on how we view each other. Ahern demonstrates that labels impact our sense of self.

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

In conclusion, the book “Flawed” by Cecilia Ahern manifests how labels affect people’s sense of their own identities and how others are biased towards other people because of what they are labeled

Read More
1185 Words | 5 Pages

The social learning theory for instance shows Manson leant deviance in his early childhood from his mother, who was incarcerated when he was five. This implicates the environmental control and that of close persons. It depicts that behavior modification can be achieved through enhancing the social environment for criminals. The social conflict theory explains that individuals engage in crime when the legal system, which is under the control of the wealthy, identifies their acts as being unlawful (Lionell & Rawlins, 2005) Labeling theory

Read More
1308 Words | 6 Pages

Labelling theory, which is rooted in symbolic interaction theory, holds that people in societies are given symbolic labels that they learn to identify with (Siegel & McCormick, 2020, p. 265). These labels can completely change the way in which a person sees themselves, and subsequently, others begin to only see the person through the significance of their label (Siegel & McCormick, 2020, p. 268). In relation to crime, the negative labels that criminals are given ultimately leads to the label becoming their master status, resulting in further commitment to a criminal career (Campeau, Lecture Topic 8, Video 2). As individuals become more committed to deviant lifestyles, they turn to peers who have also been stigmatized, consequently isolating themselves from conventional society and locking them into this criminal lifestyle through social exclusion (Siegel & McCormick, 2020, p. 265). The process of labelling is difficult to escape, as once society has labelled someone as criminal, it leads to a cycle of negative self-labelling, the joining of deviant subcultures, and further deviant acts, which only serve to amplify their deviant status (Campeau, Lecture Topic 8, Video

Read More
580 Words | 3 Pages

Cerulo and Ruane continue to discuss the power of naming within the labeling theory. The labeling theory discusses that names or labels we apply to people, places, or circumstances influence our interactions with them and the realities of the situation. (Cerulo & Ruane, 88). For example, Barack, Hussein Obama might be labeled as a muslim or terrorist which affects how society views him. However, in reality President Obama is a proud Christian

Read More
1001 Words | 5 Pages

Labelling theory is the most important approaches to understanding deviant and criminal behaviour. The labelling theory is rooted in the idea of social construction and how people view one another and is one of the most focused field in sociology thanks to Howard Becker. The labelling theory begins with the assumptions that no act is initially criminal. The definition of criminality is established by the those who are in power which is done through the formation of law. To be able to understand the work of H. Becker one must understand that deviance is not a set of characteristic or a group of people, but it is the process of interaction of the deviant and the non-deviant and how the law may interpret this interaction.

Read More
150 Words | 1 Pages

Social reaction (labeling) theory are negative or positive labels that can influence the person to become a criminal. For example, a seven-year-old boy steels a candy bar from the store and gets caught and media puts him in the paper. Now all the children call him a robber and later he commits a more serious offense like stealing a car. Usually social reaction/labeling is associated with a primary and secondary deviances. A primary deviance would be the poor boy took the candy bar because he was hungry and living on the streets, but never committed another crime after he became wealthy.

Read More
2398 Words | 10 Pages

Furthermore it is often thought that by labelling an individual or group as deviant, makes them more so by ‘living up’ to their label, supporting Merton’s self – fulfilling prophecy theory (Merton 1948). Some people commit crimes that are not publically labelled and often don’t get caught, these people often do not see themselves as acting in a deviant way. Labelling someone as a ‘criminal’ or an offender carries stigma and others may see that person purely as their label. This can result in social exclusion and settles as the individual’s master status by which a person’s identity can be emotionally

Read More
231 Words | 1 Pages

This shows that labeling people is a bad practice for our society. Another reason on why it is bad to label people is because of what happens in high school. Kids “from working-class backgrounds often don’t have that luxury—and are the ones who are most damaged by high-school labeling.” (Can You Ever Escape those

Read More
1900 Words | 8 Pages

To further explain, the use of labeling in the criminal justice realm is a sociological method, in which labels can be construed to stigmatize individuals, as well as offenders, for criminal or deviant behaviors and actions. This practice also seeks to focus on the individuals who participate in the labeling process to gain a better understanding of the control they implement (Thomas & Bishop, 1984). LABELING AND STIGMATIZING Further, it is challenging to nail down who exactly was the forerunner in developing labeling theory. When looking into most theories or practices, one is able to give credit to the theorist, and then the

Read More
1651 Words | 7 Pages

INTRODUCTION Sociology as it is known today would not have been the same without the intervention of Emile Durkheim (1858–1917). Durkheim is widely recognised as one of the founding fathers of sociology and for good reason: he successfully brought drastic changes in the way social scientists considered the associations between individuals and society. Durkheim rejected biological and psychological explanations of the human behaviour and therefore focused his attention on how mankind’s social problems could be determined by social structure. Excelling in his discipline, Emile Durkheim had a visionary insight on various domains such as the sociology of knowledge, ethics, social stratification, theology, legislation, pedagogy, and deviance. Accomplishments in these domains can be found in previous theorists.

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

Weber’s procedure involves certain models of ideal behavior of individuals that he calls “ideal types” which he believes are not the reflections of how the society actually behaves but are to be considered abstract, hypothetical examples of situations from which actual events deviate because of accidental and irrational factors. These ideal types are used to compare and assess the deviation of actual behaviors and events from the ideal type. Durkheim on the other hand believed that the method applied in the study of sociology should be universally applicable. Unlike Weber who put more emphasis on interpretation of actions and on creating some fixed ideal types, Durkheim believed that we should not begin to approach sociology with pre-formulated broad notions that exist only in our minds without observing the real world around us. He believed that moral facts were phenomenon that were possible to observe, describe and classify and that since “morality develops over the course of history and is dominated by historical causes”, it changes with the change in social conditions (Durkheim xxvi).

Read More

More about Emile Durkheim's Labeling Theory

Related Topics

Open Document