I will argue that this passage seeks to reflect Gilgamesh’s change, especially in terms of his relationships. Initially, the passage reveals Gilgamesh’s sense of superiority when compared to Enkidu. However, as the passage continues, readers begin to sense Gilgamesh’s support and encouragement of his new friend. This shift in his relationship is an example of a broader theme in this narrative: interaction between characters are the driving force of the plot. After forming a quick friendship, Gilgamesh and Enkidu band together to take down Humbaba, the protector of the Cedar Forest. Enkidu expresses some reservations about this fight, but Gilgamesh pushes the pursuit forward. Gilgamesh continually asks his friend as to why he “speak[s] like a weakling” (II, 232). Gilgamesh, who has been assured of his strength and power since day one, cannot seem to understand Enkidu’s “spineless words” (II, 233). Enkidu’s lack of courage makes Gilgamesh not just sad, but “despondent” (II, 232). The use of such strong diction is foreshadowing of Gilgamesh’s future reservations in fighting Enkidu. Instead of appeasing Enkidu’s fear, Gilgamesh continues to speak of himself. As a human, Enkidu “is but wind” (II, 235). However, for Gilgamesh, mortality “exists not for …show more content…
For so long, Gilgamesh was sure of his own power and superiority. Now with the introduction of Enkidu, he begins to care about someone else. Evidence of their brotherhood can be seen when Gilgamesh deeply mourns the passing of Enkidu. Through this passage, readers are exposed to the effect Enkidu had on Gilgamesh’s character. Many of the major character developments in this epic can be traced back to the meeting of two characters. From Enkidu and Shamhat, Enkidu and Gilgamesh to Gilgamesh and Uta-napishti, readers understand that the trajectory of an individual’s life is most affected by the relationships and interactions they have with