ipl-logo

Eramo V. Rolling Stone Case Summary

693 Words3 Pages

COMM 3310 – LEGAL CASE BRIEF

Citation:
Name of the case — Eramo v. Rolling Stone
Case Published — The New York Times
Date Published — Nov. 7, 2016
Level of Court — Federal Court
Chapter or area of communication law that your brief applies to — Libel/Defamation.

FACTS:
Plaintiff, Nicole P. Eramo sued and won a libel lawsuit against the Rolling Stone, Wenner Media—Rolling Stone’s fellow company, and journalist Sabrina Rubin Erdely over an article published in November 2014 called, “A Rape on Campus” in regards to a rape situation at the University of Virginia (“UVA”).
According to Eramo vs. Rolling Stone complaint, the plaintiff, Eramo’s argument was that her reputation was damaged through the media over false information about her involvement …show more content…

In contrast, Eramo immediately took action in Jackie’s case and arranged meetings with the victim and the Charlottesville Police Department to make the rapist accountable for their actions. In result, Jackie did not want to cooperate with law enforcement in describing the rape or give any names of the men involved – which concluded to no official police report.
ISSUE
Eramo had to prove that the defendant’s, the Rolling Stone and Erdely’s information in the article was actual malice.

COURT’S DECISION AND REASONING
Two years after the article was published and two weeks in trial, a federal jury of ten decided that Erdely did commit actual malice and unfairly portrayed Eramo’s reputation. Originally, Eramo requested for $7.5 million in damages, however the jury’s decision ordered Erdely to pay $2 million in damages to Eramo. The Rolling Stone and Wenner Media were ordered to pay her $1 million – a total of $3 million in damages. (Sisario)
According to the New York Times article, “the jury’s decision about the amount damages were not discussed in their conclusion of the defendant’s portion difference.”

DISSENT:
With a significant amount of research, I could not find a dissent to this specific case of any judges that were for or against the

Show More
Related
1635 Words | 7 Pages

It was then said in the ruling that “States can set their own standards for private plaintiffs suing for defamation, provided they do not impose liability without fault,” and that the private figure must prove that the publisher was negligent, in order to “succeed on a defamation claim”. I found the ruling agreeable and reasonable. In the case study about Invasion of Privacy, Ruth Shulman and her son were involved in a car accident, and when they were rescued, Cameraman Joel Cooke recorded everything, “including conversations between Flight Nurse Laura Carnahan and Ruth, without the consent of the

Read More
481 Words | 2 Pages

The way the human brain works is marvelous, but often people alter the reality of a situation making false accusations and statements. Ronald Cotton was accused of breaking into Jennifer Thomson-Cannino home and sexually assaulting her. They both lived

Read More
983 Words | 4 Pages

Good morning I am Luke Thomsen, I am representing the State of Maycomb on a case about Sheriff Heck Tate’s poor investigation. On two counts we will first hear about his poor investigation in the Tom Robinson V, Mayella Ewell case and in the death of Bob Ewell for we never found out who truly murdered Bob Ewell for Sheriff Heck was too lazy to document it. THE THEME AND THEORY

Read More
503 Words | 3 Pages

At the end of this case, the court had this to

Read More
1601 Words | 7 Pages

This paper will consist of an analysis of the case presented in the podcast Serial. The podcast Serial is based on a first degree murder case in Baltimore, Maryland, USA that took place on January 13th, 1999. The case consisted of Adnan Syed, a 17-year-old Muslim boy attending his final year of high school being charged with the first degree murder of his 17-year-old ex-girlfriend Hae Min Lee. 16 years later, Adnan is adamant that he did not commit the crime, however he is still serving a life sentence for her death. In relation to the case, alibi believability, polygraphs, psychopathy, interrogations, inconsistencies within Jay’s story and confessions will be discussed throughout this paper.

Read More
1065 Words | 5 Pages

Modern Day Muckraking “In 1979, Goldschmidt, who as mayor had won national renown for the development of the downtown bus mall and the city 's then-revolutionary light rail, was tapped by President Jimmy Carter to be Secretary of Transportation” (Jaquiss). Neil Goldschmidt was a very successful politician, but he was hiding a very dark secret that the people of Oregon deserved to know. Should the type of person, who raped a 14 year old girl for three years, be considered someone that the people of Oregon look up to? This is just one of the questions Nigel Jaquiss addressed in his article about the affair between Neil Goldschmidt and a 14 year old girl that occurred from 1975-1978 (Jaquiss).

Read More
677 Words | 3 Pages

Ms. Guiterrez had already failed to do precise research for evidence, and on top of that, she was diagnosed with diabetes and had to stay in the hospital. However, the defense attorney still accepted many cases from others, which shows her desire to get money. Ms. Guiterrez shouldn’t have accepted more cases because she couldn’t handle all of it at the time,

Read More
1239 Words | 5 Pages

To support this argument, he implied that the fact that Flynt republished the ad multiple times proved the intent of Flynt. In contrast with Isaacman who referred to New York Times Co. v. Sullivan to support his argument, Grutman suggested that the ruling was irrelevant with Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell. Although Falwell could win under the ruling when the issue considered was libel involving factual statements, emotional harm based on intent was the main issue considered by Falwell. To withhold the tort of emotional distress that was ruled as invalid in a recent decision, Grutman defended it by saying that the decision was made by an inferior court, he did not view it as a good law, and there were other cases which supported the tort.

Read More
1095 Words | 5 Pages

Several years later, in May of 2012, the Court granted that partial summary judgement, given by the plaintiffs on neglect and wrongful death, would be given to the defendants. In addition to that, in August of 2012, the Court had decided that the defendants were not performing the discretionary function that should have been done. In spite of the devastating, traumatic event that transpired, the plaintiffs agreed to settle for $500,000 at the end of

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

As with any criminal case, there are always a number of issues pertaining the stages of the crime and also the media and the general public’s opinion of the case. Many of the issues and explicit actions of certain individuals that had happened during the Corryn Rayney case had affected the interpretation of the case in someway for both government workers and the general public. By analysing the issues of the case, it allows a much more detailed view on the case and how most of the issues are linked in one way or another. One of the issues regarding this case was where a police officer had been found attempting to pressure forensic pathologists to alter their case reports to align with their best interests.

Read More
568 Words | 3 Pages

The Napa Valley Register recently published an article on the hearing for the expulsion of Napa High School football player Johnny Torres. Torres, accused of, “dragging another player through the locker room and helping hold him down while the victim was groped and penetrated by other players,” was not described in the article as a rapist, nor as someone participating in the sexual assault of another individual, but instead, became the all-too familiar character of the goody-goody athlete with not a spot on his record. What is also very apparent in the article is the clear tip-toeing around what Torres and other players have been accused of, which as far as we can tell from the Register’s cryptic concealment, is gang rape. This behavior by both Torres’s family, who requested that the expulsion hearing be made public, and by the media, which in the case of the Register seems to be garnering sympathy for Torres and pulling attention from the heinous

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

The judgement in favor of Sullivan was overturned, and the Times could not be convicted of libel because the courts must prove that a person has acted with malice when making a false statement. The New York Times had the right to make false claims because they were not acting with malice. Also, in Texas v. Johnson, Gregory Johnson was convicted of burning a flag and his conviction was overturned because the “law cannot limit freedom of speech just because the thing being said is offensive or disagreeable to

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

In this article Sabrina Ederly interviewed Jackie, a student at University of Virginia, about a rape case on the campus. When this article was originally published in Rolling Stone, Sabrina believed that she was reporting the truth. However, she did not do enough research to make sure the story that was given to her was valid, and, therefore, did not follow the ethics of journalism. “Research ethics or norms promote the ‘knowledge, truth, and avoidance of error’ and protect against ‘fabricating, falsifying, or misinterpreting research data’”

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

In this article Sabrina Ederly interviewed Jackie, a student at University of Virginia, about a rape case at the campus. When she reported this interview to Rolling Stone she believed she was writing a perfectly good story about a rape on campus and helping everybody. However, she did not do enough research to make sure all the facts that were given to her were true and, therefore did not follow the ethics of writing. “Research ethics or norms promote the ‘knowledge, truth, and avoidance of error’ and protect against ‘fabricating, falsifying, or misinterpreting research data’” (Stichler, 2).She granted Jackie too much freedom

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

He says the defendant accused of murder was let off and “eight years later they found out that he’d actually done it, anyway” (12). Prejudice clouds a person’s judgement and does not allow the individual to see all the facts. It only allows them to

Read More

More about Eramo V. Rolling Stone Case Summary

Related Topics

Open Document