ipl-logo

Erving Goffman's Theory Of Dramaturgical Analysis

847 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Application of symbolic interactionist theory

Erving Goffman (1922-1982)

The following essay is going to outline two of Goffman’s theories, 1) The Theory Dramaturgy and 2) Stigma. Firstly, Goffman’s theory of Dramaturgical Analysis will be discussed. This is defined as ‘the study of social interaction in terms of theoretical performance’ (Johnson, 2015). In this theory it is suggested that the world is a stage and all beings on it are actors, whether it be front stage actors or back stage actors, we’re all constantly acting. Within this theory/analysis, there are a two sub divisions which will be looked at in further detail. These sub divisions are, Impression Management’, also known as ‘The Presentation of the Self’, and ‘Symbolic Interaction’.
Symbolic Interactionism
Although Symbolic …show more content…

According to Manning, (1992) who was quoted in Marsh (1996), Goffman “possessed an extraordinary ability to appreciate the subtle importance of apparently insignificant aspects of everyday conduct”. He used it to point out that it is one of the key ways of interaction among humans. Symbolic Interaction looks at the way in which humans interact with certain objects or each other depending on the circumstance they are in. It also looks at the way stimulus and response are interpreted as well as the development of an individual which forms as a result of interaction with the external world (Daryna, Lyudmila, n.d.). According to Marsh (p. 72, 1996), “When people interact with one another they use symbols and attach meanings to them especially in the form of language-hence the name symbolic interactionism”. It “tends to focus on the language and symbols that help us give meaning to the experiences in our lives” (Scarince, 2015). This is an example of how the interaction of humans differs from that of other species. Humans give meaning to things in order to decide how to act in certain situations or people based on what they associate the person or place with and how they view them. Different people will interact with differently to the same things or situations depending on their initial experience or interaction with it (Brown, …show more content…

For example, if an individual is in class, they will take on the role of a student, paying attention and giving respect to the authority figure in the room i.e. the teacher/lecturer, wanting to appear as a good student who is serious about their work, whereas if the individual was around a child or a baby they would adopt a persona which is more childlike, free and less serious, coming down to the child’s level, trying to portray to the child that they are not intimidating and scary, but are fun and loving. The student will act this way around their educator because to the individual their educator carries a symbol of authority, affecting the way they’ll interact with

Show More
Related
1057 Words | 5 Pages

They are two different symbols, yet they both describe something as looking nice. Another example of interactionism is how men and women sleep at night. In Pleasantville, there are only separate beds for a married couple. They both have a single twin sized bed of which they sleep at night, and when they become intimate they move the beds together to make one big one. The beds symbolize how men and women respect each other, and give each other their space.

Read More
1200 Words | 5 Pages

Symbolism is a standout amongst the most vital scholarly terms utilized frequently by numerous authors to pass on their focal thought. As indicated by the Longman Contemporary Dictionary, Symbolism can be characterized as a gadget that brings out more than an exacting importance from a man, question, picture or word. Symbolism plays a big factor in this story. The significance of Mrs. Moore trip with the kids to FAO Schwartz is caught in Bambara's utilization of Symbolism. The youngsters took a gander at various elite toys outside the store.

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

Symbolism is the practice of representing things by symbols, or of investing things with a symbolic meaning or character. In Speak, Laurie Halse Anderson uses literary devices to help the reader better understand Melinda’s personal changes and growth. Trees, lips, and coldness are all symbolically used to represent the changes of Melinda. Throughout the novel, trees play a big part in symbolizing Melinda. Melinda is constantly drawing and relating to trees in the book.

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

Mean Girls is a movie filled with unique words and weird gestures that we as watchers can understand. Symbolic interaction theory emphasizes face-to-face interaction and thus is a form of microsociology. In our textbook, symbolic interaction is described as a theory that human interaction and communication is facilitated by words, gestures, and other symbols that have acquired conventionalized meanings. An example that captures the essence of symbolic interaction theory involves Cady, Janis, and Damian at the beginning of the movie.

Read More
1120 Words | 5 Pages

Quanteonna Howard Cosmopolitan Canopy Paper Introduction to Sociology November 29, 2015 Summary of Cosmopolitan Canopy: In the story Anderson takes us through the city of Philadelphia, showing through his ethnographic study how people from the city frequently relate across racial, social borders, and cultural. People engage in an individual popular ethnography. Canopies working in close proximity makes an interaction that becomes a cosmopolitan neighborhood. In the lively atmosphere of these public spaces, courtesy is the order of the day.

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

Actions can also show symbolism. The end of the story is a good example of this, when she is ripping the wallpaper off of the walls trying to find the imaginary woman. When her husband walks in and sees his wife, he faints. Just like what was described of the woman in the wallpaper. “Now why should that man have fainted?

Read More
996 Words | 4 Pages

Society has taught me what different words and symbols mean, affecting the way that I communicate on a daily

Read More
1743 Words | 7 Pages

Usually, society views those who have a score of four and higher to be successful and adored by many. Therefore, an individual with a low score can cause society to view them negatively. As Lacie strives to maintain a positive impression on others, she depicts a performer of her own theatrical performance. By using a Symbolic Interactionist perspective, Nosedive is explained through Erving Goffman’s dramaturgical analysis which includes the aspects of front stage, back stage, and embarrassment. Goffman’s dramaturgical analysis depicts life in the form of a theatrical performance where everyday life represents a stage and each individual is a performer (Brym et al.

Read More
1013 Words | 5 Pages

Without the use of symbols the interpretation of the story could be altered and be taken in

Read More
1449 Words | 6 Pages

5) Outline and assess the dramaturgical approach of Erving Goffman. In your answer you should consider how Goffman’s ideas could be applied to an everyday situation of your choice. This essay will examine Erving Goffman’s dramaturgical approach to everyday living, including the social roles we play and social behaviours that we convey. A number of Goffman’s concepts will be discussed such as front and back stage, dramatic realisation and impression management with each idea applying to the everyday situation of interacting with friends over lunch.

Read More
809 Words | 4 Pages

When taking a look into the society I call myself a part of; it can be placed into three perspectives. The three theoretical perspectives we may live in are; Structural Functionalism, Conflict Theory, and Symbolic Interactionism. The world may be a place where we all live congenial among each other with open arms and helping hands guiding us with structural functionalism. Rather, then live in harmony with everyone we may be in a world filled with greed and power hungry organizations leaving us with conflict theory. Though, we may also live in a accepting environment with individuals setting standard to be understanding with other people 's ideas and creative pathways they 're on through linguistics.

Read More
1811 Words | 8 Pages

The sociologist Erving Goffman introduced the notion of face into social interaction with his article On Face-work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements of Social Interaction (1955) and book Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior (1967). His notion of face has been acknowledged as an inspiration to many politeness approaches. Face is considered a key factor that affects human interaction. Agassi and Jarvie (1969:140) believed that people are human "because they have face to care for – without it they lose human dignity". Despite its importance, there is no consensus among researchers on how we should define face.

Read More
1490 Words | 6 Pages

(Blumer, H (1969) p. 1). According to Blumer, there are three basic premises of Symbolic interactionism. The first premise is that human beings act towards things on the basis of the meanings that things have for them. (Gasa and du Plessis p.154).

Read More
1206 Words | 5 Pages

According to Erving Goffman, social interaction is almost similar to a theatre, at the same time people in daily life are likened to be actors on stage, each playing variety of roles. There are individuals who observe the role-playing and react to the performance as the audience. In social interaction, just like in theatrical performance, there are two regions, each with different effects on an individual’s performance: front stage and back stage(Crossman, 2015). The situation that an actor formally performs and adheres to conventions that have meaning to the audience is considered as the front stage. The actor knows he or she is being watched and therefore acts accordingly.

Read More
1690 Words | 7 Pages

Outline and assess the dramaturgical approach of Erving Goffman. In your answer you should consider how Goffman’s ideas could be applied to an everyday situation of your choice. We are all social actors according to Erving Goffman. In everyday life, in every situation, we are continuously portraying ourselves in a certain way. We want to be perceived in a certain way, so we have different ‘masks’ for each social interaction we have.

Read More

More about Erving Goffman's Theory Of Dramaturgical Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document