Escola Vs. Coca-Cola Bottling Company Of Fresno

According to the University of North Carolina Wilmington, “Product liability is the legal rules concerning who is responsible for defective or dangerous products, and a set of rules which makes it easier for an injured person to recover damages.” In other words, product liability is a law which held the defendant (company who owns the defective product) accountable of the products’ defects and problems. Companies assume that the cost of liability will be lower overall than the cost of modifying a product to make it safer. The Escola v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Fresno (1944), Ford Pinto case, and the case in All of My sons have one thing in common— negligence. In All of My Sons, the cracked cylinder heads sold to the Air Force led to the death

Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Fresno was a landmark case in American law and in the development of the common law of product liability in the United States. The plaintiff Gladys Escola, a former waitress, was injured caused by an exploding Coca-Cola bottle. The result was a deep five-inch cut, which severed the blood vessels, nerves, and muscles of the thumb and palm of the hand. The plaintiff sued the defendant (Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Fresno, CA). The issue is the possibility of res ipsa loquitur (negligence) of the bottles, stated by the Stanford Law School. The reason why the bottles spontaneously explode is the infallible method for testing bottles, and the people putting carbonation charges could be careful as well. But, it is a fact that it is still unknown how the bottle exploded, but it is a defect, and the manufacturer is accountable for strict

He is a hardworking man and felt he earned to have economic security in his life before he dies. We don't think Joe approved those cracked cylinder heads because he is an uneducated man. But, it is a possibility he approved the cracked cylinder heads because, as an uneducated man, he is desperate to protect his way of making a living. As a result, twenty-one pilots died because of his desperality to make money just because he want it. The difference between the case of Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. Of Fresno and All of My Sons case is the Coca Cola Bottling case had an possible issue of negligence. The verdict is the defendant was accountable of strict liability, rather in negligence, because the company didn't know what was happening in their factory. However, Joe Keller knew everything that what was happening in his factory. He should have known about the cracked cylinder heads. Since Coca Cola Co. Bottling Of Fresno is a huge company. Some people won't even go inside their factory to look around, sometimes they assign people to supervise the workers. Keller was the supervisor and owner of his business. All he wanted to do is to make