Did you know that there has been over 230 deaths on Mt. Everest? That is more than the average amount of kids who graduate from Port Clinton High School! For instance, in the article “Why Everest?” the author Guy Moreau states, “Alan Arnette has climbed Everest four times and thinks perhaps 200 dead bodies remain on the mountain.” Why do people still continue to do this with all of the dangers it outcomes? When individuals put themselves at risk, they do not have the right to rescue services. To start off, rescuers are putting themselves at a risk of losing their life due to saving others. For example, according to “The Seattle Times,” “Nick Hall, a climbing ranger at Mount Rainier National Park, fell 3,700 feet to his death after helping rescue two climbers who had fallen into a crevasse.” This shows just how dangerous providing these services can turn out to be. Also, in the article “The Seattle Times” the author states, “He was not moving after his fall, and attempts to contact him were unsuccessful. Climbers reached him …show more content…
“The helicopter flies up to about 19,000 feet and, you know the air at this altitude is very thin. So it requires a helicopter to utilize more power to stay aloft up there. So, you know, you can imagine, if you add weight, it’s going to lose lift. So in this case, they could only bring one climber at a time. They got one climber off, and they crashed attempting to rescue the second man,” states, “Helicopter Rescues Increasing on Everest .” This explains how the fact of attempting to saving individuals doesn’t always turn out achievable. In addition, “Helicopter Rescues Increasing on Everest” indicates, “B3’s cost about $2 million a piece and they’re quite expensive to operate.” Therefore, this displays how services turn out to be disastrous and how expensive they