Fragmentation creates problems in realizing policy coherence. The process requires harmonization of goals and methods to cohere around and realize the simple sense of mission. Despite that the authority as one body in policy making, the fragmentation system implies that there exists some “imposed coherence”. Consequently, decision making is ambiguous and is accompanied by conflicts and tensions between policy objectives. In this paper, I will argue that fragmentation of power negatively affects policy decisions.
Ways power is fragmented.
Separation of powers.
The United States Constitution specifies the Congress and president as co-branches of government. In consequence, the American Congress is the transformational legislature, used to substantively change and rework proposed legislation presented by the executive branch bureaucracies and the president. Mostly, Congress pass laws that the president differs with.
…show more content…
American political party front-runners find it difficult to mobilize legislators in their individual political party to endorse the party’s legislative program. This was witnessed in 2008, when the health care legislation failed to meet the minimum threshold, given that the majority of the legislatures were from the same political party, Democratic Party. Also, most of the provisions President Obama had proposed as essential on health care insurance for all Americans had been excluded from the drafts. Over the previous decades, control of political parties by ‘back-benchers’ in the U.S has increased, although, party discipline remains weak, compared to other parliamentary systems. Most substantial Congressional statutes should be joined by assembling issue-specific alliances of legislators. The absence of powerful active leaders, who demand party allegiance on all legislative issues, contribute to legislators being inconsistent when endorsing proposed