Essay On How Does The Constitution Prevent Tyranny

Constitution Prevents Tyranny
Imagine a world full of tyranny, no freedom and chaotic. Thanks to the Constitution, imagining is as far as it gets. In May of 1787, the Constitutional Convention was held in Philadelphia. Fifty-five delegates representing the 12 out of 13 states attended the convention. The goal was to frame a government better than the weak Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was the first form of government but had no way to force a state to pay taxes, nor provide a chief executive, and no court system. One may be asking, how does the Constitution guard against tyranny? The Constitution is a document that replaced the Articles of Confederation and created a new and stronger form of government. As James

According to James Madison “A double security arises to the rights of the people. The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” (Madison 1788) The two types of government have their own roles which spread out evenly between the central and state government. Certain powers are shared but most roles are distinct and separate to be fair. In reference to the Federalist Papers “Madison’s idea of division of power between central and state governments is known as federalism.” (Madison 1788). The idea of Federalism prevents tyranny because government is controlled and divided with one another therefore not giving a chance for one part of the government to overrule and take over. The division of powers keeps the government full of important roles for each. Without federalism, the constitution would not prevent

Each branch of government has roles so that a certain branch can override a decision no one else approves. Document C states that “the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other.” (Madison 1788). The offices are set up to distribute powers and make the powers even. The framers created a government so that one branch does not feel more powerful and one can override another branch if they become too forceful. The federalist papers also state that “The three branches should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” (Madison 1788). The point of checks and balances is for each government to have their own jobs but be connected in a way that they can keep a branch from going overboard with powers. All branch’s feel important but can be maintained by other branches if they make a decision not everyone agrees