ipl-logo

Defense Of Insane Automatism In The UK And The US

2260 Words10 Pages

APPENDIX A: RESEARCH ESSAY

When can a person raise the defence of Insane Automatism in the Criminal Law of the UK and the US? Insanity (insane automatism) can be the result of loss of physical control or loss of mental control over one’s actions. In a number of cases a plea of automatism has been rejected by the court and construed as one of insanity. It is therefore important to be able to distinguish insanity (or insane automatism) from simple automatism.
The defence of insanity is unusual in a number of ways. First, if successfully raised it will not result in an unqualified acquittal, but rather a special verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity. Upon such verdict, the court has a wide-ranging dispositive discretion which includes …show more content…

M’Naghten was found not guilty by reason of insanity on the grounds that he was suffering an insane delusion that the prime minister and his constituents were conspiring against him at the time of his act. So incensed were the public at M’Naghten’s acquittal that the House of Lords asked a panel of judges to establish rules governing the defence of insanity. These rules are known as the M’Naghten rules. On the precise issue in the case their Lordships concluded that an insane delusion would act as an defence only if, assuming the delusion was true, it would have entitled the defendant to do as he did.
The ruling test for a disease of the mind is that of Devlin J in the case of Kemp(1957). The defendant attacked his wife with a hammer, causing her grievous bodily harm. The medical evidence showed that defendant suffered from arterial-sclerosis, a condition which restricts the flow of blood to the brain, and this caused a temporary lapse of consciousness. Defendant sought to raise the defence of automatism. Devlin J rejected this defence, ruling that it was one of …show more content…

Clark, a young man with untreated schizophrenia, was delusional and thought that aliens had invaded Flagstaff. Like about half of those with schizophrenia, Clark’s brain disease prevented him from understanding that he was ill.
At trial, Clark's family testified that he had been exhibiting symptoms of severe paranoia for years before the shooting, and that they had been unable to access long-term treatment for him, despite many attempts.
Clark was sent to prison on October 3, 2003, for a minimum of 25 years. Once in prison, Clark refused his psychiatric medications. In February 2005, the Court of Appeals upheld Clark's conviction. His attorney then requested the Arizona Supreme Court hear the case in an attempt to get Clark out of prison and into the state mental hospital.
The Devlin test is not a convincing one. Consider for example, the medical condition of diabetes. Diabetes can produce defects of reason involving loss of conscious awareness in two separate ways. The acts of violence committed while sleep walking, while suffering an epileptic seizure and while suffering clinical depression have all been designated the result of conditions of insanity rather than of simple

Show More
Related

Appeal Of The Queen V. Danny Lalumiere Case

1100 Words | 5 Pages

The case prosecuted under the court of Appeal of Ontario, Her Majesty the Queen v Danny Lalumiere, in 2011, was intended to appeal the conviction of counseling to commit murder. The appellant argued that the life sentence was not appropriate and was outside the range of sentences imposed on similar offenders for similar offenses. This is an example of a case where legal guilt was used to provide a conviction. The conviction of the appellant was based on the testimony of a psychiatrist doctor, Dr. Pallandi, who provided a profile of the accused and concluded that the appellant was pathologically predisposed to commit an offense. The appellate court ruled against the Crown’s decision at the trial, stating that the appellant lacked moral culpability for his offenses and therefore the sentence was not deserved.

Read More

Jonathan Schmitz: The Jenny Jones Murder, And Legal Insan

791 Words | 4 Pages

The legal definition of insanity differs from the medical definition of insanity, and due to this, there have been ongoing debates on whether or not

Read More

R. V. Schoenborn Case Study

1344 Words | 6 Pages

There is also an inclination to believe that if he had not suffered from this state, then the offence would not have been committed, specially not in the barbaric way it was done. Thus, it cannot be concluded that the accused willfully preformed the act, nor that the mens rea and the actus reus coincided while he was not in a psychotic state. (Roach, 113) Related to this finding is another element that supports the verdict of the Honorable Judge, which is the Principle of Fundamental Justice that states that no one should be “punished for morally involuntary actions.” (Roach, 82) A person who successfully raises the mental disorder defence is considered to be morally innocent of the act because they were not acting freely, in this case, free from psychotic ideations.

Read More

How Does Floyd Respond To The Clutter Case

440 Words | 2 Pages

The McNaughton rule was used, and it is “the ancient British importation which contends that if the accused knew the nature of his act, and knew it was wrong, then he is mentally competent and responsible for his actions” (Capote, 169-170). The opposition, those on the state’s side, supported its use as they believed it would prevent a “temporary insanity” (Capote, 169) ruling. It was upheld, largely as it was the custom in Kansas at that time. However, the doctor who came to evaluate Dick and Perry believes that Dick is most likely healthy, but that Perry was most likely mentally ill, “his present personality structure is very nearly that of a paranoid schizophrenic reaction,” (Capote, 189). Dr. Jones had a colleague of his evaluate Perry, and they both agree that Perry seems to be of a sort of murderer that is capable of logical thought, but is not always capable of logical action.

Read More

Perry's Insanity In Dr. Truman Capote

464 Words | 2 Pages

Insanity is an illness an individual cannot overcome and will make decisions without thinking. Lacking the further knowledge of a criminal's mental state does not endorse the fate of acquiring the death

Read More

Summary Of The Insanity: The Case Of Andrea Yates

314 Words | 2 Pages

The next case was the M’Naghten. This case is what started the revolutionary insanity theory. The not guilty by reason of insanity was adopted by the New England first and then the United States. The test consisted of the cognitive test and the volitional test.

Read More

What Is Myers III V. State Of Indiana An Example Of Mental Competency?

1528 Words | 7 Pages

Mental competency is critical for court because if someone, like Myers, was determined to not be mental competent then the trial will be placed on hold for days or months or years until another psychological evaluation brings results that the individual has the mental capacity to understand the legal proceedings and consult with the defense attorney to help their case (Samaha, 2019, p. 211). In court, the jury was informed about Myers' history with mental illness and when it came time for deliberations the jury ruled that Myers was guilty of his crime but mentally ill. This conviction led to one main question for the insanity defense, and that was whether the mental illness that Myers suffered from prevented him from understanding the wrongfulness of his crime (Samaha, 2019, p. 215). After looking at the textbook and the case, there could be an argument that Myer’s mental illness did prevent him from knowing the wrongfulness of his crime because of how his chronic disorder of paranoid schizophrenia twists what is real and what is not real. At the time of the crime, Myer may not have known that what he was doing was actually real and he may not have thought that it was wrong because it was not real.

Read More

Summary Of Is Guilty Insane Or Not By John White

894 Words | 4 Pages

John White, the author of “Guilty Is Guilty, Insane or Not” an article written in The New York Times, creates an argument that he is clearly passionate about but also an argument that lacks substance. Published on February 25, 1979, the article is written during a time period where law and psychology were being introduced to each other. John White conceives an argument that when a plaintiff enters an insanity defense and is found not guilty by reason of insanity or mental defect, he or she is virtually getting away with murder. This argument he presents is highly vague, has no evidence, and is also premature due to the changes within the legal system during this time. John White states in paragraph three “Consider murder trials in which

Read More

Use Of The Insanity Plea By Andrea Yates

2597 Words | 11 Pages

During my true crime podcast era, I came across Andrea Yates. Yates was a mother who killed her five young children by drowning them in a bathtub. While listening to this case, it was revealed that the insanity plea, or also known as the insanity defense, was used. It got me thinking about how the plea works and how people would allow this outcome over a jail sentence. The insanity plea is a tough topic to tackle in the world of criminal law.

Read More

Examples Of Not Guilty By Reason Of Insanity

641 Words | 3 Pages

Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI) is a form of insanity defense that allows for an individual to not be found guilty of a crime due to a mental defect or disease that results in a lack of mens rea, or the capability to intentionally commit a crime. However, simply having a mental illness or defect does not guarantee that an offender will be found NGRI. Not only would a defendant have to have a major or severe mental illness or disease, but the defendant would have to prove that their condition impaired them so greatly as to not have any control over their behavior or any concept that they had done anything wrong at the time of the offense. Although Bob undoubtedly had a diminished capacity for logic and reason in this case, the example as given does not provide enough detail to determine the nature of Bob’s personality or his potential motives in committing this crime. Nevertheless, there is one major flaw to Bob’s insanity defense: he tried to hide the crime.

Read More

M Naughten Test For Murder Essay

516 Words | 3 Pages

Daniel McNaghten murdered the British minister, but he killed the secretary by mistake. Was McNaughten responsible for his actions due to the fact that he thought he took the life of the wrong person? The M’Naughten rule has multiple elements that the law enforcement officials to test if someone was insane prior to a murder. The part of the test determines if the felon recalls what he or she was doing at the time when the killing took place. Next, there might be a possibility that the defendant was ill to an extent where it caused problems completely in his or her mind.

Read More

Examples Of Insanity Plea

590 Words | 3 Pages

The legal definition of insanity is, “mental illness of such a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality, cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis, or is subject to uncontrollable impulsive behavior,” and this can be proved to be allowed to the defendant's case. For this, the defendant should receive the insanity plea to receive help for his crippling illness.

Read More

Madness In Medea By Euripide

1250 Words | 5 Pages

Intro: “It is sometimes an appropriate response to reality to go insane” (PHILIP K. DICK, Valis). In present day America laws have been placed that prevent people who are “insane” to be guilty of the crimes they commit. In short, insanity is the state of being seriously mentally ill relating to madness. This is presented in the book Medea written by Euripides through her point of view. In Medea, a surge of insanity purges her after she is betrayed by her husband Jason causing many cruel and harsh actions to follow from her.

Read More

An Analysis Of Insanity In The Tell-Tale Heart By Edgar Allan Poe

557 Words | 3 Pages

Insanity is a disease capable of making a person lose control of themselves. On the other hand, sanity is when a person is what others call “normal”. In “The Tell-Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe the narrator kills a man and he is confessing to the cops about it. He confesses how long the murder took and what he did each night and how he executed the murder. However, the narrator is not guilty because of the reason of insanity.

Read More

Arguments Against Insanity Defense

1042 Words | 5 Pages

Some say an insanity defense is a legal concept, not a clinical one. In some cases, the prosecution has had a hard time distinguishing between people pretending to be insane and the people who actually suffer from insanity. (Math, Kumar, and Moirangthem) Even though it is legal to be insane, do not take advantage of it and go do something you will regret later in life. There is a time and place and there is also a way to act in a public place.

Read More

More about Defense Of Insane Automatism In The UK And The US

Related Topics

Open Document