Essay On Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

When is the last time you had a vaccine? Most of the population before age six already have an utmost of 50 doses of over 10 vaccines. An immense number of these vaccines are result of animal testing. Without animal testing, we remain susceptible to multiple diseases, including rabies and polio. The curing of these maladies is just a smidge of the benefits reaped through an animal’s help. A lion’s share of these tests comes from dogs, chimpanzees, fish, rabbits, mice, and apes ("Animal Testing - ProCon.org."). As it is shown, animal testing develops some of the most proficient cures to ailments. A majority of the largest medical institutes today utilize the tool of animal testing. The minute amount of alternatives are not completely trenchant or do not apply in all situations. A few alternatives include human volunteers, using

First, tests with cells or pieces of cloned human tissue. Neither hold the ability to accurately represent a full body system’s reaction to a particular medicine’s affect the entirety of the body. Secondly, computer models which only produce accurate results of information gleaned from animal testing is correct. Lastly, human volunteering. In these experiments, a researcher administers a small dose of the experimental medicine to a volunteer to display what occurs on a smaller scale. This alternative is not only dangerous, but also unable to show the full effects ("Animals Used for Experimentation."). Animals easily continue to be the most reliable source of information, more so than humans in a select few areas. One being, animals possess a shorter life cycle, which allows a researcher to observe the long term effects more easily than a human or any other alternative. ("Animal Testing - ProCon.org.") U.S. Agencies must sign off on accepting the data from alternative methods of testing (Stokes, W.