Essay On Racial Bias In The Judicial System

Socioeconomic Bias in the Judicial System In a society where justice claims to be blind, the reality illustrates a severe contrast to this notion, especially highlighting racial bias within the legal system. In spite of recent efforts for equality, historical and modern contexts affirm an observable pattern of discrimination that disproportionality affects marginalized communities. With this in mind, it becomes rather apparent that tackling racial bias is crucial to establish a system where justice is fairly served to all, regardless of race or background. The United States judicial system takes on the guise of a “Free and Fair” evaluation of the accused, setting aside any preconceived notions in pursuit of a nondiscriminatory impartial system.

Without proclaiming overt racial discrimination by the courts and police, we do substantiate the presence of contemporary law enforcement policies and practices that are immoral by design in the eyes of marginalized groups in America. Furthermore, supported by the research done by the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) over 95 million regulatory traffic stops, “The authors found Black drivers were less likely to be stopped after sunset, when it is more difficult to determine a driver’s race, suggesting bias in stop decisions.” The validation of a detectable bias present in the adjudicators of the law by a federal body legitimizes the preconceived notion that the judiciary process is anchored in bigotry and racial bias. The effects of this institutionalized prejudice, accompanied by the often destructive excessive sentences, result in the obstruction of progress in marginalized communities and furthering the cycle onto another generation. Through the history of the United States, the judicial system and imprisonment subsequently utilized as a form of control of underrepresented minorities, installing a system of disparity across these

Stevenson's portrayals helps readers understand the urgency of addressing and combating the archaic systemic injustices detailed in his novel. In the recognition of opposition, some may argue that the racial bias in sentencing previously established is magnified or even non-existent. Common retaliation is quoting statistical data signifying that imprisonment is more closely related to socioeconomic status and previous criminality.Nevertheless, this perspective omits the systematic nature of racial prejudice, which overshadows more than just individual cases. Dismissing the existence of racial discrimination dismisses the harrowing experiences of marginalized communities and actively combats efforts toward lessening systemic injustice. It is essential to not only acknowledge the presence of racial bias, but to utilize it as a call to action to further banish and rectify the systematic flaws still in place to this