ipl-logo

Essay On Should Canada Keep Change And Abolish The Senate

712 Words3 Pages

Nancy Zhou
Social 11A
Mr. B
September, 17th, 2017
Q: Should Canada keep, change or abolish the senate?
The Reason Canada Need to Change the Senate
Canada should change the Senate because the senate is useless, undemocratic and costly today. However, the principle of Senate is a good idea, so it is still needed and important. The Senate is a legislative body of the government, which has the almost the same power as the House of Common. If Canada abolishes it means that Canada won't have a place with "sober second thought.” This is why the senate still has some value and worth Canada to improve it to let it become better.
The Senate has some benefits because it improves legislation. In the Constitution of Act in 1867, the constitution gives a …show more content…

How should Canada change the Senate to let it become better? The ideal senate is effective, elected and equal. (Cranny M, Moles G, Counter Points, 2009, P232) In order to achieve this goal, it is necessary for Senate to give a promise that they will have a high quality to do things. For example, making new laws and talking about the law which passed by the House of Common seriously and carefully. Besides, the Senate should be more democratic which can change the way that the senators are chosen: let citizens choose the Senate by themselves directly instead of to let the federal government to choose. During this election, the voters need to choose the representatives from a list of candidates; the candidates who have the largest number of votes would win. Last but not the least; a reformed Senate should have greater equality that they should provide a more balanced regional representation to protect the area where has the less populations. Thus, it should have lots of members who are from different provinces to vote directly. Under this system, each province would have a certain number of Senate seats. (Stilborn,

Show More
Related
1054 Words | 5 Pages

Vonelle Robertson Professor Currie American National Government April 15th, 2015 Essay: Should the 17thAmendment be repealed? While citizens of each state did not directly vote in the senators of their respective states legislatures chose the senators based on the law that was adopted in the constitution in 1788.The 17th amendment came about because of the state legislature being deadlocked over the election of United States Senators. This left numerous senate vacancies lasting as long as months or even years. But this was not the first attempt to amend the constitution to elect senators by popular vote. It was first introduced in the US House of Representatives in 1826 but the amendment did not have favorable support until the late 19th century

Read More
1949 Words | 8 Pages

The Senate in Canada should be abolished Introduction: Canada senate is a part of legislation institution in Canada, which represents the interests of upper class people. Different from America, it is not produced by election but directly-nominated by the premier and appointed by governor. Senate, governor, and the House of Commons are like three legs of a tripod which constitute the congress and legislation system in Canada. Senate undertakes the responsibility of proposing expostulation to governor and cabinet, which acts the role of supervision and restriction. Senate played critical role when Canada established federal government in 1867, the diversity of senators warrants the smooth convey of popular will to governors and legislators coming from different ethnic group and social status.

Read More
617 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitution guarded against tyranny due to the principles of government and the Great Compromise. This argument will be proven by Federalism, Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances, and the NJ and VA plans. Federalism guarded against tyranny by making sure the state and central governments can check each other to ensure neither government has total control. In Federalist Papers #51, Madison states, “the different government will each control each other, that at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” Our government, being split into three branches, controls each other and makes sure that one branch won’t be able to gain more power.

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

The founding father’s idea when they created the Constitution was to prevent a centralized government. As expressed by James Madison in Federalist No. 51, they believe that the power surrendered by people would be divided between the federal and state governments, creating balance of power that would enable both governments to control each other. Over time, the balance of power between the federal and state governments has shifted in favor of the federal government and this has taken place with the help of the Constitution and by enactments of Congress. The role that Chief Justice John Marshall played in defining the power of the federal and state governments during the early 19th century is important to mention because he shaped the nation.

Read More
899 Words | 4 Pages

"How Democratic is the American Constitution ?", by political scientist Robert A. Dahl is a short book that questions the ethical and political issues in America 's Constitution and the structure of the United States government. The book consists of a series of abstract lectures composed by Dahl that reflects on how the American Constitution affects modern society. While this short book brings out plentiful knowledge on the American system , it does not go any deeper into those general ideas for it is only about 200 pages. However, it is still a knowledgeable book to introduce the fundamentals of American government and political science and why American citizens should uphold the Constitution. Dahl introduces the book of how the Founding

Read More
935 Words | 4 Pages

The pros of having a more representative system are strong enough that it is something that Canada needs to adopt if it wants to consider itself a truly democratic, inclusive and fair country. The flaws of the MMP system revolve around the fact that the likelihood of governments having majorities is lower, which creates a higher likelihood of coalitions for more “power” so to speak. The more representative system also allows for people to have more choice in their votes, which leads to shorter lifetimes for most parties as voters have more control with their votes. A party that is run badly is less likely to see another term, this is of course a good thing, but inconsistent governments is brought up as a con against the Mixed-Member Proportional System. The Mixed-Member Proportional system also allows a better foundation for smaller parties to form, parties with more singular focuses have a much higher chance of having seats.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

The monarchy in Canada is a continuous debate among the politicians and individuals. This paper aims to present the advantages and disadvantages of the monarchy in Canada. This way will enable us to take a clear position. First, Canadian politics are known for their divisive attitudes, and it is very hard to get consensus on decisions. The Queen plays the role of reference for the Canadian politicians and their decisions.

Read More
1554 Words | 7 Pages

The 17th Amendment of the Constitution once it was ratified by a majority of states in 1913 changed the way Senators were elected in the voting process. Prior to the ratification of the amendment, the founding fathers saw it fit that the state legislators be invested with the authority to assign states their chosen Senators. The debate on whether the amendment was significant or not has been argued on among scholars and critics alike. One can say the fact that a debate exists at all answers that question itself. The hysteria behind the attachment of the 17th amendment is that it sets precedent for future changes to laws concerning the balance of power between the states and our central government established by the countries Founding Fathers.

Read More
344 Words | 2 Pages

The functions of the Senate is to cautiously examine legislation that are proposed by the House of Commons, to suggest changes or adjustments. The Senate can reject a bill, and recommend changes and improvements to be made. They can introduce new bills however, most bills are introduced by the House of Commons. A bill cannot become a law in Canada without the Senates approval. This is also the only reason that the Senate is a useful institution in Canada today as it represents the interest of the provinces in federal legislative.

Read More
380 Words | 2 Pages

By not having a Senate the process of making bills will be a lot quicker and could have its up and down. The downs to not having a senate will make governmental issues because it allows less public officials to pass a bill. Fewer voices are heard in the government which makes the government have quality of law. The government would have less quality of law because more bills would be

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

The Senate: “The upper chamber of Parliament where there are 105 members who are appointed until age 75 by the Crown on the advice if the prime minister.” (Rules of the Game pg 106)The original Senate that was created in 1867 had only originally 72 seats. It was created to counter balance representation population in the House of Commons, although in recent years the Senate has become to reinforce representation of groups that have often been underrepresented in parliament, examples; Aboriginals, visible minorities and women. There has been a huge debate’s on whether Canada should keep the Senate. The people all over Canada have mixed opinions on if we should keep the Senate or not.

Read More
545 Words | 3 Pages

The Senate and House of Representatives comprise the two chambers of the United States Congress. While both houses are representative bodies and jointly oversee the executive branch, both must approve all bills before the president, but both chambers have different roles according to the Constitution. The House of Representatives has 435 members apportioned to the house from across the United States. States with larger populations receive more seats within the house.

Read More
536 Words | 3 Pages

The United States House of Representatives is one of the two houses of Congress, the legislative branch of the federal government. The House of Representatives is composed of 435 voting members, who are elected every two years from their respective congressional districts. However, many experts believe that this number is too low to effectively represent the interests and needs of the American people. In this essay, I will argue that the number of representatives in the US House of Representatives should be expanded to better serve the American people. First and foremost, expanding the number of representatives in the US House of Representatives would help to ensure that every American citizen is more accurately represented.

Read More
895 Words | 4 Pages

Although they are essential to our government, there are potential problems which includes corruption, inefficiencies and equal representation. Individuals are not generally happy with the time span engaged with passing a law as well as the halt Congress put on some issues. The framers of the Constitution created a bicameral legislative in order to compromise at the constitutional convention between the large

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

Abi H. Civic Reflection Issue 1- Change in Point of View: In Canada, voter turnout has become a major issue; as there is a large amount of the population that does not vote in elections. Back in 2008, a total of 58% of the countries` population voted in the election. This is a startling low number, which since has begun to increase only slightly in recent years. In a democratic society, voting is essential for it to function with its full potential. Doing so enacts one of your basic responsibilities as a citizen, as well as shows that you are staying involved in your community and government.

Read More

More about Essay On Should Canada Keep Change And Abolish The Senate

Related Topics

Open Document