ipl-logo

Essay On Should College Athletes Be Paid

562 Words3 Pages

College sports are a multibillion-dollar industry that brings millions of fans in to watch their favorite teams or athletes play. Collegiate sports have always played a significant role in the U.S., and the debate as to whether college athletes should be paid or not has been ongoing for years. While many people believe that athletes should be paid for their hard work, as well as the significant amount of money they bring into the schools, many people also believe that they should not be paid. Although college athletes work hard, paying college athletes could lead to many negative consequences in the sport such as budget cuts in smaller income sports, athletes only playing for the money, and takes away the difference between amateur and professional athletes.
Paying college athletes could lead to budget cuts in other sports or activities that don’t bring in as much money. According to the writers of Should College Athletes be Paid, they state that some college sports and athletes would benefit, but many of them would lose opportunities. This is showing that having to pay college …show more content…

As compensation, college athletes get scholarships. These are already a form of payment, so it would not make sense to pay them money on top of their scholarships. Professional athletes receive a salary to compete, which is what separates them from college athletes. There is also a rule for college athletes stating that they are not allowed to accept any form of payment. According to Mark J. Drozdowski, the rule clearly states that “you are not eligible for participation in a sport if you have ever taken pay, or the promise of pay, for competing in that sport, or used your athletic skill for pay in any form in that sport.” To go along with this, he also states that athletes already receive either partial or full-ride scholarships, so those are essentially paying the

Show More
Related
1918 Words | 8 Pages

For this position paper, the researcher will be persuading the readers that college athletes should not be paid. This paper will answer the many questions surrounding the topic. Many sources have been gathered to strengthen this side of the argument. Many columnists across the United States have expressed their strong stances on the topic. The NCAA has been surrounded by this argument for years now, and will continue until they find an answer.

Read More
2997 Words | 12 Pages

Building on the financial disparities, another significant issue with paying athletes is because it takes away from the main priority of college. Paying college athletes undermines the primary purpose of higher education: academics. Colleges are institutions of learning first, and sports should come as a complement to this educational mission. An article that supports this is “Should College Athletes Be Paid,” which was published under Junior Scholastic, where they state: College sports provide hundreds of thousands of student athletes the opportunity to play the sports they love while getting the education and skills they need to succeed after college.

Read More
1074 Words | 5 Pages

Focusing on the schooling part more than trying to earn money in college would be much more beneficial for these student-athletes (Should). Of all undergraduate students, athletes receiving some kind of compensation (scholarships, financial aid, etcetera) graduated with a degree 5% of the time more than non-athletes. This shows that without having to worry about any kind of money students are in a better environment to succeed and set themselves up for

Read More
1444 Words | 6 Pages

Paying College Athletes There are several reasons why college athletes should receive a form of payment. The athletes always seem to be practicing, which means that they are almost always busy, leaving little time for anything else. Additionally, they have to go to their classes and study in order to participate in that particular sport. In contrast, giving the athletes money could potentially be a bad idea. Some athletes might receive more because their sport may generate more money.

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

College is a place for students to obtain a college degree and help them to get ahead on their “real world” careers. Athletic departments in college have become huge money incomes in the past ten years; college football and basketball are even shown on the television. This has resulted in many believing these athletes deserve to be paid for their contribution to the schools athletic income. However athletes in college are given the opportunity to play the sport that they love as well as receive a top education. For some players a $20,000+ per year tuition is not enough, they want to be paid with more than just a scholarship.

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

The NCAA has strict bylaws that keep college players from receiving payment. “12.1.2.1 Prohibited Forms of Pay. “Pay,” as used in Bylaw 12.1.2 above, includes, but is not limited to, the following: 12.1.2.1.1 Salary, Gratuity or Compensation. Any direct or indirect salary, gratuity or comparable compensation” (13). This rule is the major reason athletes are unable to receive a salary or stipend of any kind.

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

One of the reasons why college athletes should be paid is that they bring in a significant amount of revenue for their universities. As noted in "The Case for Paying College Athletes," “The college sports industry generates $11 billion in annual revenues. Fifty colleges report annual revenues that exceed $50 million. Meanwhile, five colleges report annual revenues that exceed $100 million.” Text 1 line 1-3

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

Paying college athletes would not be beneficial at all for the players, programs, and schools. College athletics is one of the most exciting sport spectacles in the country. According to businessinsider.com, 231 NCAA division 1 schools brought in 9.15 billion dollars in revenue in 2015. It is obvious that college sports are extremely popular. But they are not popular because of the handful of stars in the whole NCAA.

Read More
1579 Words | 7 Pages

For the athletes, the money made from their sport would allow increased concentration on their studies due to less focus on tuition and living costs. As statistics have previously shown about the minimal chances of ever going pro as an athlete, a salary would make the time the college athletes spent on their sport worthwhile, and they can also have a higher chance of being better off financially post college. If their time as a college athlete is made valuable, it will also increase motivation and potential to further hone their skills to perform better in their sport. Though giving college athletes a salary would be exceptionally beneficial for them, it also has negative aspects as well, pertaining to the colleges’ perspective about it. One major argument made against college athletes salaries is that if they get paid, then they would become regular employees, and are then subject to being laid off.

Read More
1984 Words | 8 Pages

The scholarship is the reward to the student, while the student’s talent is the reward to the university. College athletes should not be paid. If students are to be paid, then payments would have to be constant across

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

In addition to this, other expenses like insurance, paid travels home for holidays, and other family situations are not provided to college athletes (Eitzen [#3]). This evidence supports the idea that college athletes should be paid so the extra costs not covered by scholarships don't affect their ability to compete in the future. College athletes’ scholarships are supposed to give them an opportunity for education and sports. However, with the additional expenses that come with college, paying those expenses off while playing a sport while doing school is too much for one person to handle. This gives another good reason for why College athletes should be paid (Whitlock [#5]).

Read More
1073 Words | 5 Pages

College Athletes Should Not Recieve Payment College student-athletes should be paid, right? Maybe not. As an athlete, I put in 3 or more hours of work daily for my sport, from practice, training, and watching film. I do all this for the love of the game, not so that one day I can go to college and compete to get paid the highest and have that be my main focus rather than my development as a player. Being paid would bring conflict to sports people once loved.

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

If colleges began to pay their athletes, then they could build a bad reputation for being mercenary and lose their educational reputation If they are allowed to play, then it can be financially detrimental to the college because there are many flaws in the system. College athletes should not be compensated for their actions regarding athletic activities, no matter what sport or level they compete on. The idea that college athletes should or shouldn 't be paid

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

II. Athletes are already paid through scholarships and should be going to college primarily for an education. A. In a USA Today College article, points out that athletes are already paid through scholarships, experience and education (Marshall, Blake).

Read More

More about Essay On Should College Athletes Be Paid

Related Topics

Open Document