The Progressive Era was different from the New Deal that came later. While the Federal Government did enact reforms during the Progressive Era, these reforms were largely exercises of negative power, that is, they consisted in the denial of existing conditions. This can be seen in reforms such as anti-trust (Anti-trust Textbook pages 489-490) measures proposed by President Wilson. While the government was willing to enact reforms of this style, it did not increase its role in people’s lives by the creation of new agencies such as was the case in the New Deal.
One of the utmost important remote institutions the Progressives worked through was that of the unions. As industrialism flourished more advanced, working circumstances grew worse and more brutalizing. Laborers felt they needed a way to combat this trend; as a result they created UNIONS for collective bargaining for better working conditions. Nevertheless, a union was more than just an institution for improvement. They were major
…show more content…
This is a an idea of how the Federal Government’s role had expanded to take the place in American’s lives that secluded organizations had once filled.
Despite all the revolutionizing drives of the Progressive Era, it essentially degenerated in the 1920s. The United States of America had exited WW, and the industry was booming. With Ford they created a large amount of cars, and their production method inspired others, and America’s productivity amplified greatly. Companies used aesthetic displays to make consumers want their products, even though the consumer did not need it. With shifting the attention of American plea to material objects, which companies could deliver, American business froze the reforming spirit citizens had once had during the Progressive Era.
When the Great Depression came, citizens urged for its reforming spirit