ipl-logo

Essay On Therapeutic Cloning

611 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ethical issues with human cloning

What if therapeutic cloning gets in the wrong hands of people and become another Hitler. Therapeutic cloning should be approved and funded using tax payer money because it benefits many Americans. Therapeutic cloning un-values the use of embryonic stem cells to regenerate lost cells, therefore helping with limb replacement, new spinal cords for paraplegics, and curing cancer. Cloning can be both good and bad, only if people really want to use it for good will. Americans tend to believe that therapeutic cloning could have positive effects on damaged tissues and organs. David Holcberg, author of “Therapeutic cloning is Pro-Life”, claims that the benefits include “healthy skin”, and “spinal cords for paraplegics.” Holcberg is indicating therapeutic cloning is advantageous for patients with loss of skin like fire victims. In the short film, “Eyes of Nye: Cloning”, by PGS, Bill Nye addresses the idea of repairing spinal cord injury through a study done on a rat. The rat was able to regain his mobility of embryonic stem cells into its …show more content…

Americans find cloning an issue for religious and natural beliefs. Catholic people believe it is a sin to mess with God’s creations, and non-religious people feel that it is against our human nature to create life in a unnatural way. By creating life in a lab or some other environment where life is not usually made, angers many Americans. Religious people specifically hate the idea of messing with anything that is considered as God 's creation. Even if it is “wrong” to create life in a lab, religious people and people who are against Therapeutic cloning need to see the benefits of it. Overall, therapeutic cloning should be funded in the United States. It can be very beneficial if we use it to our advantage. This can resolve issues for people who lost limbs in combat or repair a spine. It would make the lives of many Americans much

Show More
Related
842 Words | 4 Pages

After reading about therapeutic cloning, I’ve come to the conclusion that it is no different than what researchers are trying to do with ES cell research. The difference in the process is that the egg is penetrated, without destroying it and the nucleus is removed with the host DNA and replaced with a nucleus from the cell of the donor that requires the ES cell for therapy. At that point the egg is left to develop into a blastocyst using the donor DNA and the process of extracting the inner cell mass to cultivate the stem cells that are genetically compatible with the

Read More
1190 Words | 5 Pages

The artefact produced in the laboratory is not even a pre-embryo but only a quasi-pre-embryo, because it’s genetic potential to develop into a complete human—its totipotency—is only virtual” (Tannert). Meaning that the embryos used are not even full embryos sometimes and therapeutic cloning is not meant to create full-fledged human beings. Tannert also stated that “[t]hese cloned artefacts are not to be implanted into a woman's uterus and they are unable to achieve this under their own power, as are genuine pre-embryos. These artificial cell cumuli are only allowed ethically, and in some countries even by law, to provide knowledge as well as stem cells for research and therapeutic purposes, and nothing else” (Tannert). This means that therapeutic cloning is not immoral because it is not used to create a person and has no potential to become a person outside of implanting the embryo within the uterus, which would be reproductive cloning, not

Read More
1325 Words | 6 Pages

Many believe cloning is a perversion of science, and some are even concerned with a real life Frankenstein situation: “Reproductive cloning… could lead to a Dr. Frankenstein’s vision of lab manufactured humans. To me this is a perversion of science” (Ford 1). Furthermore, in Frankenstein, Dr. Frankenstein detached from the world as he became obsessed with his studies, diminishing his health. A similar thing could happen to scientists who clone if they decide that they are “playing god,” which can be dangerous for the scientists and the clones. Cloning is so controversial and causes an overbearing amount of stress for it to be befitting to the human mind, as Victor Frankenstein puts it, “If the study to which you apply yourself has a tendency to weaken your affections, and to destroy… those simple pleasures in which no alloy can possibly mix, then that study is certainly unlawful… not befitting of the human minds” (Shelley 50).

Read More
1254 Words | 6 Pages

With the possibility of endless cures and treatments to all kinds of diseases, it’s no wonder embryonic stem cell research is the topic of discussion among Americans. However, disagreements between religious parties and our government has slowed the process of conducting these studies. Multiple religions including the Roman Catholics, Christians, Lutherans, Buddhists, and many others are against studies on embryonic stem cells due to the fact that during the process of extracting the stem cells, the embryo is killed. They feel that this form of research is unnecessary and that life is sacred from the moment of conception (Abernethy). On the other hand, some Christians believe that it is the world's job to conduct these experiments because it can save lives (Pelosi).

Read More
389 Words | 2 Pages

I believe human cloning interferes with nature in ways humanity will not be able to handle. This source states, " This could lead to a set of problems that we have no ability to handle. " The evidence suggests that human cloning can lead to the fall of humanity, due to clones becoming soverienty. However, some people believe that human cloning can be useful, due to assisting with unlawful interests. I beleive that this will only create misuse of knowledge in trying to correct clones in right paths.

Read More
1440 Words | 6 Pages

Though technology at some point will likely make this possible, “human cloning is scientifically distant at best” and “the scientific community has universally condemned it” (Acost and Golub 429). Without the support of the possible creators of this technology, there is no way that this would ever come about, and it remains irrelevant to the known information about the benefits stem cell research would have on the world of healing medicine. At the center of the controversy lies politics and the continuous battle between being supportive of the research and respecting the beliefs of American groups. Starting in 1995, legislation took on the topic of stem cell research by creating the Dickey-Wicker Amendment.

Read More
344 Words | 2 Pages

We can’t clone human cells yet but it is just a matter of time. Instead of it, we managed in cloning people by using religion, technologies, social networks, mass media, and advertisement. Being followed by the wrong idols, overestimating things we don’t need, not paying proper attention to those things that really matter, we

Read More
1510 Words | 7 Pages

There was a time when the thought of cloning a person was only something imagined in a science fiction movie. But today what was once science fiction has a possibility to become a reality. The question becomes, “Is cloning ethical or unethical?” To answer that question one must first have a good understanding of what cloning is, how it is done, and the possible long-term ramification. A current definition of cloning is “a person or animal produced asexually from the genetic material of a single human parent” (A.G., 2001).

Read More
1563 Words | 7 Pages

Although cloning can be beneficial, it is still surrounded with controversial and moralistic issues. In recent years the medical field has expanded greatly on the positive uses for cloning. An example

Read More
522 Words | 3 Pages

The Media and Cloning Ethics After carefully reading Leigh Turners, “The Media and Ethics of Cloning” I have discovered that cloning is a reality with more experimentation in the near future. Clones are organisms of exact replicated DNA. Many people may find that cloning is inhumane or playing God, for those with religious affiliation. Cloning may create a debate on human values, thus causing many to form a biased opinion on the matter of cloning.

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

Most people say that they wouldn’t clone their animal. Cloning has many downsides, for example you won’t really get your animal back, it is very risky for all animals involved, and besides there are 1,000’s of shelters overflowing with animals right now! I agree with the people who are against cloning , I actually think cloning is somewhat selfish. First off, thousands and thousands of animals are in shelters right now!

Read More
1183 Words | 5 Pages

Also cloning is against some peoples religious beliefs. In the Bible it states, "Know that the lord, he is God! It is he who made us, and we are his; we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture" (New International Version, Psalm 100:3). This means and goes for all cloning, he is the creator and that he created you and everything in this world. Religion is a big part of the world and will have a huge affect on people and what they decide.

Read More
1614 Words | 7 Pages

Most people in our society, no matter what level of education that they may have, have heard of the cloning, specifically the cloning of Dolly the lamb, and have some notions regarding the idea of cloning humans. "The successes in animal cloning suggest to some that the technology has matured sufficiently to justify its application to human cloning" (Jaenisch et al.). However, not every agrees that human cloning is a something that should be put into practice (Hoskins). There generally seem to be two basic divisions on this issue: those who find it inappropriate and unethical, and those who find it a reasonable and necessary step in the progression of scientific research (Lustig).

Read More
988 Words | 4 Pages

Many scientists are trying to clone humans but is it ever justified? There are a whole lot of debates on this topic, and I am strongly against it. Human cloning is ethically wrong; there are many risks involved, which will lead to detrimental effects on human society. Before going into my points, I would like to talk about what cloning is. According to the National Human Genome Research Institute, cloning is “a number of different processes that can be used to produce genetically identical copies of a biological entity.”

Read More
717 Words | 3 Pages

And they are working on heart disease. But they haven’t started testing on humans yet. Therapeutic cloning, which involves human cloning, is a difficult and ethically disputed procedure. There have been scandals and rumours of the first human clone in the past, however without proof. There are no news on major breakthroughs in therapeutic cloning in the recent past.

Read More

More about Essay On Therapeutic Cloning

Related Topics

Open Document