Was dropping the nuclear weapons on Japan justified or not? The battle between the US and Japan has been going on forever. It all started off when Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, getting the US involved in World War 11. After many years, war in Japan was still roaring on, with no end in sight. Japan was visibly losing, with a shortage of soldiers and supplies, so the US knew what they had to do. They dropped the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima, August 6th. Of course before the actual dropping of the nuclear weapon, there was lots of pondering, arguments, and controversial opinions. Eventually, President Harry Truman, made the decision to drop the atomic bomb. Because thousands of American and Japanese soldiers would’ve died if America didn’t drop the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, dropping the nuclear weapons was justified. …show more content…
After the US dropped the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima, demolishment and death struck. Japan should’ve resigned a long time ago, and avoided even more misfortune to their country, for, as stated by ABC Clio, "It was running desperately short of vital supplies and faced the prospect of starvation." Even through these terrible conditions, Japan's stubborn government still refused to surrender, leading the US no choice whether to drop another nuclear weapon. The second atomic bomb, dropped on Nagasaki, made Japan resign, ending World War 11 once and for all. Since World War 11 has ended, tons of metal and rubber have been saved, for they were very popular for military use. In addition, since World War 11 had ended, no more money was used to produce more weapons and supply soldiers with resources, so lots of money was added to the US and Japanese government. The money was used to restore damages from the war, and increase the economy in the US and