ipl-logo

Essay On Was The Us Justified In Dropping The Bomb On Japan

728 Words3 Pages

Was the U.S. Justified in Dropping the Bomb on Japan? On December 7, 1941, at 7 am, the Japanese Air Force led a surprise attack on the U.S and the U.S. Air Force, and this was called the battle at Pearl Harbor. There were 2,400 casualties, 1,700 wounded, and 21 ships and 8 battleships used in this battle, which was nearly the entire U.S. fleet in the Pacific because of the Japanese attacking. After this ambush, the U.S. joined in the war, was no longer an isolationist due to being attacked, and was fighting the war with two fronts, which was in the Pacific and Europe. On account of many American lives taken from the surprise attack by the Japanese, the U.S. decided to take its revenge by slowing attacking and making its way to Japan’s Mainland. …show more content…

was not justified in dropping the bomb on Japan. In the first place, the bombing was not meant to be a harmful weapon, instead it was meant to protect people. According to the article, when the bomb was created, the purpose of it was to be a deterrent and to intimidate other countries, so they would not attack the U.S. This proves how the bomb was supposed to be a defensive weapon for any possible attack on the U.S.. In addition, the bombing was an inhumane to do. According to the article, hundreds of thousands of people, who didn’t have a say or right, were killed and vaporized by the bomb when it exploded. Those who haven’t been killed had to suffer from radiation sickness, starvation, illnesses, and mutilations. Many innocent lives were taken, in consequences of the Japanese soldiers initiating the war with the U.S.. On the other hand, the U.S. bombing was justified in the bombing of Japan due to the Japanese taking many American lives during the Pearl Harbor war. The attack of the U.S. to the Japanese was served as a retaliation because of the atrocities the Japanese had caused. That is to say, the U.S. had believed it was only fair that they avenge the death of their fallen soldiers. In the end, the U.S. was not justified in the bombing of the Japanese because due to this atomic weapon, many innocent lives were taken as a result of using the atomic weapon for something other than deterrent, defense

Show More
Related

Compare And Contrast The Pacific Theatre And American Theatre

929 Words | 4 Pages

The European and Pacific Theatre There were many battles in World War II, all of them being important and having different outcomes. Two main theaters we are focusing on are going to be the European Theatre where the Invasion of Normandy took place, along with the Pacific Theatre where the Attack on Pearl Harbor occurred. Both events had major impacts on the outcome of World War II, along with all the other battles we encountered. If ether of these battles turned out differently, America may not have become the amazing beautiful place it is today. The battle of Pearl Harbor occurred early morning in Honolulu, Hawaii on December 7, 1941.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq

882 Words | 4 Pages

This image shows how big of a threat and danger Japan is- it also shows how important it is to bring Japan down. The atomic bombs are justified because of Japan’s aggressions towards U.S. The United States’ use of atomic bombs on Japan is justifiable because it saved thousands of American lives; the Japanese were given fair warning, and their aggressions towards the U.S.

Read More

Drop The Bomb Dbq

345 Words | 2 Pages

Therefore knowing how the Japanese soldiers think about surrendering, the millions of lives saved by ending the war quickly and shortly, and the countless warnings given to the Japanese, I think dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was warranted and

Read More

Was The Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq Essay

1257 Words | 6 Pages

The atomic bomb was a military necessity due to the effect of Japanese cruelty, the opportunity of technology, and the necessity to preserve the union. To begin, one of the ways the bomb was justified was through the

Read More

Should We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

852 Words | 4 Pages

In fact, Ralph A. Bard, Undersecretary of the Navy wrote to Secretary of War Stimson in a June 27, 1945 memorandum. “I define this decision as an emotional and reckless decision, Japanese government may be searching for some opportunity which they could use as a medium of surrender” (Bard). In fact, the Japanese government expressed desire to end the war, and would have accepted conditional surrender before the mainland invasion in November. The reason for dropping the bomb was forcing Japan to surrender unconditionally. In America’s opinion, Japan had lost the war; they did not have any capital to negotiate with.

Read More

Explain Why Atomic Bombings Was Justified

399 Words | 2 Pages

In modern society, many people are still debating whether of not the droppings of the atomic bombs on Japan at the end of WWII were justified. Some believe that the bombings were fair, while others believe it was morally wrong and inhumane. This thus leads me to discuss the controversial topic and explain why the bombings were not justified. The Bombings Were Inhumane

Read More

Atomic Bomb Justified Research Paper

1838 Words | 8 Pages

The atomic bomb made this justified because this made the long lasting war end and people knew they were going to survive and see their loved ones again. Soldiers have been exhausted physically and mentally thought the war and

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Bombing

592 Words | 3 Pages

Even to this day there is still discourse on whether or not it was justified in the first place, it was not. The bombing was not justified because of the instant death of civilians and the two bombings could have been avoided. The bombings very obviously pose heavy moral and legal examination. It goes without question that killing civilians is wrong and a war crime as defined by genova as an attack targeted towards civilians. Japan had committed countless war crimes throughout World War Two.

Read More

Why Was Hiroshima Justified

1840 Words | 8 Pages

There are many reasons why it could be argued that the dropping of the atomic bomb was justified. One reason is that Japan was warned, they were given plenty of opportunities to surrender such as the Potsdam declaration. The Declaration was issued to Japan by President Truman and the Allies of America after America had tested the Atom bomb on July 26th. The declaration was a proposition of surrender to Japan that linked directly to the dropping of the atomic bomb.

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Dropping The Atomic Bomb

863 Words | 4 Pages

Theoretically of course, what if a country was to develop a weapon strong enough to completely disintegrate cities and all the people living in it? Coincidently, the United states discovered a bomb that did exactly that and ended up thrusting the world into a new era of weaponized technology towards the end of World War II. Countries from this point on became wary of opposing the United States, aware of the power they possessed, especially since the US had already used this weapon on Japan to end the war.

Read More

The Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay

581 Words | 3 Pages

President Truman was treating people even worst by putting them through the torture of the bomb and the resulting effects of the bomb. Time became a major factor into the decision, and dropping the bomb was a result of that fear. On the other side of the argument, the Japanese did bomb Pearl Harbor which was the catalyst that got America involved in the first place. We as a country should not need to compromise with the nation who started the battle.

Read More

The Atomic Bomb Unjustified Essay

633 Words | 3 Pages

This verdict was made by Harry Truman, to either invade Japan by land and end the war that way, jeopardizing American soldiers' lives, or drop Little Boy. And this decision was wholly gratuitous violence because it caused innocent lives to suffer, both mentally and physically. First of all, the atomic bomb was unjustified because scientists wanted to use it as a science project that they wished to test out. The atomic bomb was the first of its kind & so instinctively, the U.S. wanted to test it out. Fleet Admiral William Jr. specifies, "The first Atomic Bomb was an unnecessary experiment.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

844 Words | 4 Pages

In 1945, the United States launched an atomic bomb to Japan as an attempt to get Japan to surrender WWII. Firstly the United States dropped “Little Boy” in Hiroshima and later dropped “Fat Man” in Nagasaki. Although the intentions of these bombs was because of war, was it really necessary? This atomic bomb destroyed the lives of many Japanese through deaths, diseases and destruction. Isn’t the American moral strong enough to prevent this?

Read More

Hiroshima Bombing Justified Essay

797 Words | 4 Pages

On August 6, 1945, the Japanese city of Hiroshima was simultaneously annihilated in a few seconds, killing thousands in a snap of a finger. The bombing of Hiroshima, carried out by the United States, was the first time an atomic bomb was dropped on any form of civilian infrastructure. Many people argue that the bombing of Hiroshima is considered a war crime under the rules of warfare and that the United States should be charged accordingly. However, I believe that the bombing of Hiroshima was justifiable because the Japanese had attacked the U.S. without warning at Pearl Harbor, the Japanese had prior warning before the bomb was dropped, and because invading the Japanese mainland would cost millions of lives. To begin with, the bombing of Hiroshima was justifiable because the Japanese attacked the United States at Pearl Harbor without warning.

Read More

Is War Ever Justified

1233 Words | 5 Pages

The debate over the legitimacy of the atomic bombings of Japan generally revolves around what it was going to take to get Japan to agree to an unconditional surrender and what that might cost in American and Japanese lives. Those who supported the use of the bomb took the utilitarian view that it would end the war quickly and thereby save even greater numbers of American and Japanese lives by avoiding an Allied invasion of the home islands. In the context of The Just War Theory, however, the issue still comes down to the legitimacy of targeting civilians in industrial cities this line had already been crossed. Utilitarian considerations, such as the doctrine of double effect, only apply if the intended target is indeed military. Strategic bombing in World War II essentially was a decision to kill people not because of their military role, but because of their nationality.

Read More

More about Essay On Was The Us Justified In Dropping The Bomb On Japan

Related Topics

Open Document