While the NCAA constantly affirms its commitment to its root values, it is simultaneously brokering deals with national networks to show live football games to millions of people”(Listland). If college athletes were to get paid, it would only make the sport more competitive. College athletes should be getting paid because they would work harder, they would have money for necessities, and they would not have to worry about getting a job. There is already a significant financial agreement to student athletes, the Ohio State athletic director Gene Smith said that he has always promoted cost of attendance because there is a specific part of their student athlete population that [does] not have enough money to spend. The fairness of the attendance, guilt and wariness over more courtroom fights. They're beyond the point of getting mad whether the collegiate model to be bastardized. A labor force is helping make the athletic department's money in tax exempt nonprofit. Around $2,000 cost of attendance was passed …show more content…
The Pell is one of the longest-standing forms of financial aid. It typically goes to players who come from families with low incomes. Academics cover the center or main piece of college expenses like their tuition and dorm and board. The new idea is supposed to close the piece between their scholarship money and how much it really cost to attend school. D1 college athletes made $1.7 combined in 2013-13 (Isidore). That money is increasing with the newer broadcasting ideas and money makers. College athletes get paid for their food and clothing from boosters and have strict rules from the universities. The NCAA helps the player get home after a death of a loved one. For the first time they are allowing the colleges to give money for like the little things, laundry, movies, student fees, clothing, etc. for the first time in