Initially, the essential outcome for the USSR under Stalin resulted in a successful totalitarian state during 1927 and after 1939. Although, the outcomes for the USSR under Stalin resulted in a successful totalitarian state for Stalin as he was in control, the Russian public still had a negative impact post 1933. The Russian public conditions after the successfulness of the Stalin’s Soviet Union was still atrocious, especially for the kulaks and the farmers who were living in Russia during the ruthless period of industrialisation and collectivisation. During the near outcome of Stalin’s Soviet Union, “Almost 99 percent of all farmed land was collectivised by 1937….Stalinism had succeeded in destroying the spirit of the Soviet Union,” (Cantwell, …show more content…
Consequently, as time progressed during Stalin’s Soviet Union, near the outcome of Stalin and his beliefs, “by 1939 every admiral, three of five Red Army Marshals, and roughly half the officers of the armed forces had been shot,” (Brooman, 1988). Why will a positive outcome occur if Stalin is eating the USSR from inside, trying to create a successful Soviet Union? This particular source of information is very relevant to the topic as it highlights the appropriate outcome for the Soviet Union under Stalin’s rule. Additionally, by investigating the success of Stalin’s Soviet Union in 1939, a staggering amount of “1,548,366 detained persons, of whom 681,692 were shot – an average of 1,000 executions a day were to be seen,” (Budanovic, 2016). Since the Great Purges from 1936 to 1938, number of deaths and casualties were nearly countless. From Budanovic’s findings, we see that an official number stands 1,548,366 detained persons of whom 681,692 were shot. Hence, why this source is relevant to the topic and as it explicitly answers the overall outcome of Stalin’s Soviet Union and his desired success at the cost of many human