ipl-logo

Essay Why College Athletes Should Not Get Paid

691 Words3 Pages

Being a college athlete can be very stressful and demanding. They have to go to school and maintain their grades like non-athletes while trying to balance games, meets, and daily practices at the same time. They do not have time to work regular jobs or hours. For this reason, advocates for college athletes getting paid have come to light. However, there are many reasons that athletes should not get paid. I believe these reasons overshadow the points of supporters for athlete salaries. These reasons include: lack of funding in majority of schools, a decline in competitiveness, and the inflation of student athletes into bigger schools resulting in “power houses”. To begin with, very many universities big or small do not actually have the resources to fund salaries for college athletes. All colleges and universities have to pay to build …show more content…

The beauty of college sports is the fact that these student athletes put their talents, that they have been gifted with, to work on another level. In comparison to NCAA basketball and the NBA, in my opinion players grind and work a lot harder in college basketball. Not to just shoot to win a championship, but these players work and play as hard as they do because they want ti be make it to where the professional are at. Meanwhile in the NBA, players tend to not play to their full potential night-in and night-out. Also, professionals take games off to rest or to save energy for bigger games. All in all, the NBA players pick and choose when it is competitive in the league, while college basketball players play hard all the time to make it somewhere. Another reason why paying college athletes would mess with the competitive balance is that smaller schools would not be able to offer as much as school such as UCLA. Which brings me to my next point of athletes migrating to bigger schools causing an imbalance in sports across the

Show More
Related
103 Words | 1 Pages

College schools provide for student athletes enough. They pay for everything provided for the the students whether it’s scholarships or playing in the school games. Through it all it really doesn’t matter if they (the athletes) get paid for, it’s the opportunity that the coaches and university give them to play on the

Read More
2997 Words | 12 Pages

Building on the financial disparities, another significant issue with paying athletes is because it takes away from the main priority of college. Paying college athletes undermines the primary purpose of higher education: academics. Colleges are institutions of learning first, and sports should come as a complement to this educational mission. An article that supports this is “Should College Athletes Be Paid,” which was published under Junior Scholastic, where they state: College sports provide hundreds of thousands of student athletes the opportunity to play the sports they love while getting the education and skills they need to succeed after college.

Read More
935 Words | 4 Pages

The reasons why college athletes don't get paid when they are in college sports is because the coaches don't think the athletes won't get that much of recognized in the world and that's leaves them to find ways to get money and it can lead them to

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

College athletes spend most of their time and effort into their sport. a College athlete on average will have three hours of classes

Read More
1453 Words | 6 Pages

Rodney D. Fort explains that: Many people have an aversion to paying college athletes for their services, but an examination of various principles of economics show that paying athletes makes sense and would make the college sports system more efficient in the way it distributes money. Players would receive more of the revenues they produce while pay would be cut for administrators and other employees in the athletic departments. (Fort 10) Many sports followers wonder where the money would come from if athletes would get paid. They think college athletic departments barely break even but their is some confusion. Fort stated, “Universities allow athletic departments to keep all excess revenues on an updated basis during any given budget period.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

When picking a school to play for, academics are at the bottom of the priority list for a lot of athletes which you may not think is right but that is what is happening. The NCAA also has their athletes missing school days to compete in tournaments that generate more revenue. There are ways to make this happen for these athletes deserving

Read More
1124 Words | 5 Pages

While this is true, most college athletes try their best to get to the professional level, not all college athletes make it to the next level. Those that know that their chances in playing professionally are not high might not be inclined to always put forth maximum effort. A little extra incentive in the form of compensation would encourage maximum effort from all athletes all the time. Paying these athletes can only increase the effort, and therefore competition, in their respective

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

Paying college athletes would not be beneficial at all for the players, programs, and schools. College athletics is one of the most exciting sport spectacles in the country. According to businessinsider.com, 231 NCAA division 1 schools brought in 9.15 billion dollars in revenue in 2015. It is obvious that college sports are extremely popular. But they are not popular because of the handful of stars in the whole NCAA.

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

NCAA data, however, indicated that only 20 of the 126 football bowl subdivisions universities earned an operating surplus on intercollegiate athletics in 2013 (Fulks 2014, p. 13) only a portion of those profits made it to the academic side of the schools. The problem isn’t whether college athletes should be paid, mostly all of the athletes receive grants or some type of aid that covers almost every college expense while at the institution. The NCAA policy compensates athletes for such thinks as room, broad, tuition, books and other fees. (“The Case for Paying College Athletes.”) its is likely that paying college athletes would shift the power from schools that made lower income with there sports teams, to more high-power schools such as Duke university or Alabama. This in fact would shift the dynamic of college institutions from the many that are out there with teams and probably make them equal to the number of professional teams (NBA 32 teams)

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

College is a great place for students to gain knowledge but most importantly athletes play the game love and have so much passion for it, while the people behind the scenes are filling their pockets with greed. These athletes sweat day and night to be the best as whole an individually, to be on top and what every other athlete wants a chance to win a National Championship. In the student’s eyes they see a championship. The mind of a business person all they see is a money making opportunity. Paying college athletes would solve the issue along down the road when they become a pro and sign for a five year fifty million dollar contract that somebody will not come knocking on their door because they were making under the table money in college.

Read More
936 Words | 4 Pages

Finally, college athletes are doing the same amount of work as professional athletes but are not getting paid like them. They travel and practice for most of the week with little to no time to study and are not getting equal treatment with professionals, even though they do the same thing. An article from late 2015 notes, “The University of Chicago study notes that growing demand for larger tournaments and more televised games means more travel for all teams involved, as well as more games played on weeknights during the school year” (“Point: College Athletes”). Students are spending more time practicing, playing or on the road than they do in class or studying. In essence they are spending as much time playing and practicing as professionals but are not getting paid for it.

Read More
1484 Words | 6 Pages

College athletes also work extremely hard, and make a lot of money for their schools, NCAA. This is different from professional sports they don't make not one dime of money for themselves, or for their family's. Most of theses players won't make it to the pros, and the colleges just use them for their ability, and do not give them any

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.

Read More
1049 Words | 5 Pages

Athletes are generally chosen by schools to represent on the highest collegiate level. Smaller schools in most cases cannot offer the same incentives as Division 1 schools therefore giving the athlete the drive to make it to Division 1 schools. Often they leave college after the first year to pursue a career in the professional leagues which affords them the salaries needed to have a comfortable life. Being paid on a collegiate does not give a player the incentive to be better. It only gives the player the incentive for overzealous life style and possibly only wanting to do just enough to scathe by.

Read More

More about Essay Why College Athletes Should Not Get Paid

Related Topics

Open Document