ipl-logo

Essendon 34 Persuasive Speech

747 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Cheating in sports

Gentlemen, I take you back to the day, where the court of arbitration for sport had found essendon bombers players, now known as the Essendon 34, were found guilty of taking the banned substance Thymosin Beta 4,: "I 'm very disappointed, shocked is probably the best word.” Words spoken by the Coach of Essendon, James Hird, words that reflect the feelings of Australia very accurately. The Court of Arbitration for Sport has found Essendon Bombers players, colloquially referred to as the "Essendon 34", guilty of taking the banned substance Thymosin Beta 4 (TB-4) during the Essendon Football Club 's supplements program in 2012, upholding the appeal by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). This finding overturned the AFL Anti-Doping Tribunal 's …show more content…

As elite athletes, which members of the AFL definitely are, an elite athlete is meant to know whats being put into their own bodies. Not knowing whats being put into your body, or in this case, whats being injected into your body, Is like a car company not knowing what car parts are being put into a car, . The members of essendon shouldn’t have taken the drugs in the first place. Every serious athlete looks for an edge but an "edge" doesn 't mean cheating - in the same way walking into a bank doesn 't mean you 're going to rob it. And yet for some illogical reason, elite athletes held up as society 's "role models for everything" are at the same time all smeared as potential cheating, fraudulent, pill poppers who will do anything to win - including poisoning the very physical bodies that guarantee their careers and …show more content…

2. Essendon, did not provide the sufficient evidence in a fair manner, in fact they were being incooperative towards the authorities of WADA( the world anti doping authority). Medical records were not kept in place as the essendon players are regulated to do, per treatment they acquire. The players had all receieved education in anti doping. It was common ground that the AFL anti-doping training for the Players included emphasis on individual responsibility for what supplements were used and an obligation to declare us of any supplements. A clear warning to that effect appeared on the cover of the 2010 AFL Anti Doping Code. No player appeared to have made us of the WADA hotline or indeed any other hotline No player appeared to have onducted internet searchers for Thymosin or to have made any other inquiry as to its elements or

Show More
Related
1371 Words | 6 Pages

Shortly after, he too was required to undergo drug testing to settle suspicions. The use of drugs at this time wasn’t just happening in baseball, but all across different athletic platforms. Since several athletes in the past years were tested to have used PED’s (performance enhancing drugs) at the time of competition, the International Olympics Committee took a fighting stance against the use of drugs in sport stating: “The use of doping agents in sport is both unhealthy and contrary to the ethics of sport” as their central “reason” to why PEDs are banned from the Olympics. Given the prestige that the Olympics holds over all other sports, leagues from different sports all over started to follow suit. However, the statements to ban the use of these drugs on the account that they are unhealthy to the athlete and “contrary” to the ethics of sport is

Read More
998 Words | 4 Pages

Most Athletes Do Drugs, But Who Really Cares Athletes using performance enhancing drugs have always been in the media. When a beloved athlete is caught using drugs the media tears them apart. Any one’s favorite athlete could become nothing to them after a drug test. The articles “Cheating and CHEATING” by Joe Posnasnski and “We, the Public, Place the Best Athletes on Pedestals” by William Moller, show two sides of the effects of media as well as fame for athletes. As mentioned, “Cheating and CHEATING” by Posnanski gives its own side to the effects of media.

Read More
1866 Words | 8 Pages

9.2 (2013): 135-59. Print. This article written by Jack Anderson a Professor of Law at Queen’s University, Belfast, concerns the legal issues that surround the prohibition of doping in sport. The current policy on the use of performance enhancing drugs in sport is underpinned by both a paternalistic desire to protect athletes' health and the long-term integrity

Read More
1946 Words | 8 Pages

Dr. LIncoln Allison argues that in truth, steroids are not really “cheating”, they are just a way to bring out the full ability from a player. “A sportsman or woman who seeks an advantage from drugs just moves up to the level appropriate to his or her underlying ability”(107). She suggests that we deal with other, much greater problems, before worrying about teroid issue, ”In general, the risk to health from performance-enhancing drugs is considerably less than that from tobacco or alcohol, and we ought not to apply paternalistic moral assumptions to sport that we are not prepared to apply to the rest of

Read More
2055 Words | 9 Pages

For years, the use of performance-enhancing drugs has haunted all levels of sport, baseball taking the majority of the publicity. Many have lost sight of the fact that baseball players are not the only athletes that face this life threatening addiction. Due to the amount of padding they have to wear, football players can easily disguise their size therefore keeping them from receiving scrutiny from the public. This has allowed more and more players to look to PEDs in order to gain an edge over their opponents. The issue spans to not only the professional level, but the high school and collegiate divisions as well. Because the National Football League sits on a higher platform, they bring in an exceptional amount of money compared to that

Read More
1410 Words | 6 Pages

A step in this direction is the new drug testing program that was negotiated and approved by the owners and players for the 2005 season. It is far more comprehensive, intrusive, and punitive than the 2002 program that it replaced. Time will tell whether the new program will rid the sport of the blight which allows juiced-up players to achieve phony records that overshadow authentic accomplishments (Staudohar. 2005).” All players work hard everyday, but the ones who are taking steroids to get ahead faster are just cheating themselves. Although, there could be a brighter side to steroid use.

Read More
1099 Words | 5 Pages

The history of drugs in sport is one of the main impacting factors on its impact within society because it is through the history that many other aspects such as the economy have been impacted. The use of drugs in sport by athletes such as Lance Armstrong throughout the history of high performance sport has meant that with every new method of testing that the world anti-doping agency is coming out with, there are people coming out with ways for their athletes to undetectably dope. This has meant that because athletes have seen other athletes such as Lance Armstrong get away with doping for so many years, they believe that they too can easily get away with in, therefore creating an increase in the use of drug in sport. Between 2012 and 2013 there was a 20% increase in the positive testing to drugs by both Olympic and non-Olympic sport. This is a dramatic increase because of the fact that there was only an increase of 0.8% in the amount of drug testing preformed (14).

Read More
2062 Words | 9 Pages

Background: Performance-enhancing drugs have been widely used in sports for centuries. The first recorded use of PEDS in sports was during the ancient Olympic games in 776 BC when athletes experimented with herbal medication 2. However, what qualifies as cheating to us was perfectly acceptable to them and the athletes that participated weren’t

Read More
1275 Words | 6 Pages

Athletes use of performance enhancing drugs has become all too common in today’s society. With many athletes testing positive for doping, sports are becoming tarnished with athletes trying to gain an unfair advantage on their competitors. Although players are tested often for such drugs, there are still many loopholes and some drugs are not detected by current systems. So what would cause an athlete to put their body at risk to gain just a slight edge on their competitor? Sports should be a test of real skill, not artificial skills given by doctors.

Read More
541 Words | 3 Pages

In conclusion, Performance Enhancing Drugs should not be tolerated in any sport, whether professional or amatuer. These drugs are highly dangerous and even lethal to all athletes who use them. It is also unfair to athletes who choose not to use these drugs, as they are performing on their hard work and talent and not relying on an “edge” to help them reach their goals. These drugs are highly addictive, just like any other street drug or alcohol and can be fatal in many cases.

Read More
1338 Words | 6 Pages

¨Richard Callicott, former Chief Executive of UK Sport, stated in a Nov. 1, 2003 article titled¨ "Yes or No? Question of the Week: Drugs in Sport," published in The Times (London):"As the national anti-doping agency we will never accept this. Performance-enhancing drugs are not only prohibited because they violate the spirit of sport but because they can damage the health of athletes. In 1976, the East German swimming team won 11 out of 13 Olympic events, and later sued the government for giving them anabolic steroids. In 1992, Vicky Rabinowicz interviewed small groups of athletes.

Read More
769 Words | 4 Pages

We need to educate the athletes so that they understand that there are long-term impacts from taking performance enhancing drugs. Not only physically but also emotionally and psychologically. Another example of a negative impact of being branded a drug cheat is when

Read More
1503 Words | 7 Pages

But this applies to only those who resort to cheating ways. Sports persons always hit the headlines for a lot of controversies like using drugs, playing for two clubs, abusing the fans of other countries or clubs or inappropriate behaviour in the field or breaking the code of conduct and so on and so forth. The problem does not stop here; the sports medicine which the players take is also causing serious debates and discussion. Issues like faking injury, losing intentionally to get a stronger opponent and failing the gender test had also surfaced in the

Read More
1223 Words | 5 Pages

There have been many instances of doping at the Olympics. The IOC began drug tests at the 1968 Games and since then, several individual athletes and teams have been disqualified and stripped of their medals. For years, Russia has been accused of doping their athletes. “Whistleblowers have alleged that up to 99 percent of Russian athletes have taken performance-enhancing drugs, with one explaining, ‘You can’t be on the national team without using [performance-enhancing drugs]. If you don’t take them, you have no future in sport.’”

Read More
1077 Words | 5 Pages

Even though using performance enhancement drugs can give athletes benefits, but it can also cause harm and severe danger as well, therefore using drugs in sports should still be illegal. Competitors would prepare harder and try to meet their goals while some will attempt to cheat their way by utilizing enhanced medications to expand their capacities even beyond. The want to win is very affected in the idea of games, and a few competitors will do whatever it takes to ascend to the top. Over the most recent few years, numerous competitors in various games have been caught using performance enhancement drugs. At the point when a competitor tests positive to participate in sports, the competitor is either disqualified or suspended for the entire game.

Read More

More about Essendon 34 Persuasive Speech

Related Topics

Open Document