Undoubtedly, there are many people wanted to have eternal life. However, Hamlet did not. Hamlet was one of the most famous tragedy written by Shakespeare. The story was about a Denmark Prince named Hamlet revenged for his father, who was killed by Hamlet’s uncle, and cursed the death of his lover, his mother, his uncle and himself. The main character Hamlet was struggled about suicide serval times in the whole play. Meanwhile, he wandered that all humans were capable of suicide, but they chose to bare the cruelty, pain of the world, instead of suiciding themselves. This essay aims to analyze the reason human beings chose to live by analyzing the texts morally, religiously, and aesthetically. Hamlet thought his life was so miserable to accept, so he wanted release. “O, that this too too solid flesh would melt” (I.ii 129-158) was emerged after he was not able to leave Denmark and forced to live with his remarried mother and his disgust step-father (his …show more content…
Christians believed that people either got eternal life or eternal damnation. It clearly showed in psalm that suicide is equal to murder, and only God can decided the final destiny of single person. In the play,Hamlet’s question “To be or not to be” also can be inferred as why humans should abound the chance to have a love and peaceful afterlife by killing themselves. His question further approved the punishment brought by suicide. Moreover, this play showed the principle of Christianity by the funeral of Ophelia. “Is she to be buried in Christian burial when she willfully seeks her own salvation?” (Hamlet Act 5 scene 1) These two gravediggers argued whether Ophelia deserved a funeral, since she was suicided. Their idea approved that suicide was religiously forbidden at that time. Therefor, another reason that Hamlet did not choose suicide was because it was against the God, by thinking it will be better if suicide was not the sin against