The prosecution is charging the defendant Alex palmer with first degree murder of Jes Markson. Critical aspects of four witness testimonies will be analyzed and discussed. Furthermore, the prosecution will explain the importance of each testimony and how the testimony helps link the Defendant Alex Palmer to the crime. The first witness Detective Dana Brown should state that she has been working for the Hollywood police department for eighteen years, seven of which have been as a detective. Disclosure of this information to the jury will help establish her credibility.
What type of false confession was it? Give specifics that substantiate your answer. Thomson had signed a statement that acknowledged his presence in the crimescene, but stated that the murder was accidental. List any extenuating circumstances that might have contributed to this false confession (other than those covered within the definitions of the various types of confessions).
The prosecutors in the Wayne Williams case presented evidence and witnesses in the case. None of the witnesses, in this case, witnessed Wayne Williams commit any murders. The witnesses were there to testify about what they noticed Wayne Williams do, that was not normal or unusual. The testimony which was the most damaging was Angelo Foster who was a former press secretary to the mayor. He gave information about a conversation that he had with the defendant’s father.
The legal factors of this case are the level of crime that has been committed is a very high-level. The strength of the evidence is not to strong since the detectives did not thoroughly go over fingerprints or follow up on what had been the alibis. The detectives thought the eyewitness and forced confession would be enough to close this
Many people, including a police officer, were also in attendance and could, therefore, confirm McMillian’s presence in the event and absence at the crime scene. Nevertheless, the authorities pin the case against McMillian without concrete evidence. They ignore the eyewitnesses who were with him at the fund-raiser event when the murder was allegedly committed. Therefore, prosecutors maliciously suppress vital testimonies, and on top of that, find false informants who come to court and testify against Walter McMillian. The only evidence that links McMillian to the murder of Morrison is a testimony by a white career criminal, Ralph Myers.
The witnesses are motivated by fear, as seen in Brigg’s, King’s lawyer, question to them, saying, “You were afraid and you would have said anything” (Meyers, 37). The witnesses themselves would admit to this. Bolden stated that “I knew that the people got killed, and was thinking of trading what I knew for some slack” (Meyers, 48). When someone is afraid, they are willing to say anything to get out of trouble. Both witnesses were afraid of going to or staying in jail.
The evidence will show that the State's main witness, Jay Wilds, who was allegedly involved in the aiding of the victims murder, is an unreliable witness. Jay’s testimony has many inconsistencies and misleading information. During Jay’s interrogation with the police, he changes multiple parts of his story. The following are a few of the modifications the witness made, one Jay states to have refused to help in the digging of the victims grave but later reforms his story and states he did. Two, Jay told police Adnan informed him about his plan to murder Ms. Lee the day the murder occurred but later alters his story and says Adnan had frequently mentioned killing her.
Even thou the Supreme Court struck down this law some sates still follow their own constitution [pg. 29]. Walters’s life was heading for disaster and he continue to see Kelly, he even testify on behalf of Kelly in court when Kelly husband had file for a divorce due to his wife seeing a black men. Kelly’s life also came down has she lose custody of her kids, she began to see other males, and she meet a guy named Ralph Myers. Myers had committed a crime and kill Vickie Lynn and he could find a way out as police had him in custody, he confessed of the murder but also drag Kelly and Walter. Even thou police didn’t believe his version, but the sheriff was getting heat of a previous murder of an 18 year old girl, who was like the daughter of the town.
It was the state's case against Adnan. ”This proves that adnan is innocent because this shows that the court used a unreliable source of evidence. This is when Jay told the police that adnan had murdered hae. ”The story Jay told police had problems, because it kept changing from telling to telling. ”This proves that adnan is innocent because This proves that even the police had not believed jay
Atul Gawande in his article “Whose body is it, anyway?” introduced couple of cases, which discussed a controversial topic, doctors dealing with patients and making important medical decisions. These are difficult decisions in which people might have life or death choices. Who should make the important decisions, patients or doctors? Patients don’t usually know what is better for their health and while making their decisions, they might ignore or don’t know the possible side effects and consequences of these decisions.
Randolph believed in racial equality in “For The Record” he states: “To American Negroes, it is the denial of jobs in Government defense projects. It is racial discrimination in Government departments. It is widespread Jim-Crowism in the armed forces of the nation.” Randolph and Washington believed in “equality of opportunity in the rapidly expanding defense industries and government agencies”.
The narrator murdered, dismembered, and concealed the body of an old man. The evidence suggests that the narrator was perturbed and mentally unstable during the time of the murder. The narrator has also admitted the crime and is expected to take responsibility for his actions. This was inferred based on the fact that he confessed to his crimes and willingly turned himself in. Additionally, the narrator has given the exact location to the body of the perished man.
The “Witness” is a fascinating story, but I believe the author gave it the wrong title. I will agree that a lot of witnessing went on throughout the plot, but the reactions from the characters made the story much more interesting. I have given you some background information from the story so you can understand why the character reactions were so important. When writing this argument, I focused on the person who made the biggest difference with her reactions, Leanora Sutter. All of our reactions to the events that happen in our lives affect what happens next.
Frida Kahlo was born in Mexico City, Mexico on July 6 in 1907. She is a Mexican self-portrait artist, meaning, that she painted portraits of herself. Frida is considered one of Mexico’s best artist. Her painting experience began after a tragic bus accident in which she suffered from harsh injuries. While recovering from the accident Frida started and finished her first self-portrait painting a year later, then gave it as a gift to her former partner Alejandro Gómez Arias.
In this paper, the movie “The Judge” is going to be discussed to view the criminal case that is presented. The case that is being represented in the movie is The State of Indiana v. Joseph Palmer of murder in the first degree. The fact that is known is that the victim, mark Blackwell, was struck by a vehicle while riding his bike at night from a convenience store during a rain storm. The issues that arise from the case that is mentioned is trying to put the accused at the scene of the crime because moments before the alleged crime, the victim and the accused were seen having a brief conversation at a local convenience store. By analyzing the case from a criminological perspective, I will be able to determine if the facts and issues that are
