ipl-logo

Ethical Lobotomy Procedure: Freeman's Thought Process

190 Words1 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ethics in psychiatric nursing essay

I completely agree with your claim regarding how unethical the lobotomy procedure was and how Freeman’s thought process was completely opposite of that of a physician as he only believed in conducting the surgical procedure on mentally ill patients while rejecting the negative long-term results of what the lobotomy did to the individuals. Based on the videos, I found the entire procedure to be absurd in nature as well due to no proper form of equipment being utilized to carry out the surgery making it more irrational. Furthermore, I was highly baffled by how important fame had become for Freeman that he was incapable of understanding the significant damage and risk that went hand in hand with operating on his patients making it seem as he had
Show More
Related
312 Words | 2 Pages

The ease at which they were able to sell the body in addition to the high price is what set the horrible events to follow. Knox was a certified doctor and surgeon, but opted to teach instead of practice medicine.

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

After reading this case I was terribly shocked about the fact that something like this could happen in our medical history. I couldn’t believe how a patient could be neglected so much. Based on the material that we have learned the lack of ethical theory of deontology in Dr. Evan was disturbing. As a doctor Dr. Evan’s role is to care for patients, keep them away from harm and prolong their life. Though in the trial he stated as if he didn’t care.

Read More
1334 Words | 6 Pages

The patients that were test subjects were of a variety of diseases and disorders, “one person had advanced Parkinson’s and couldn’t talk, others only spoke yiddish, one had ‘multiple sclerosis’ and ‘depressive psychosis’. Regardless, Hyman wrote, ‘I was informed that consent was not necessary… that it was unlikely that Jewish patients would agree to live cancer cell injections” (Skloot 133). This would not be the only time that Jews were

Read More
920 Words | 4 Pages

This gave a moral framework that prohibited medical treatment to be executed. Regarding, drug administration it is only a doctor’s duty that can administer the effects of drugs, no one else is able to prescribe the drug because he or she does not know about drug’s effect on humans. In this case, giving medicine to the Singleton was contrary to medical goal because the purpose of medicine is treated not to kill a person. If Charles Laverne Singleton stays in prison, he did not harm anyone, and he was not a threat. He suffered from schizophrenic and it was a kind of

Read More
348 Words | 2 Pages

This study was passed and funded through Congress; however they did not know the full story. The wrong in this study was that the men did not give informed consent and did not receive any treatment. The men were studied till their autopsy, which is obviously death. This sparked much controversy and changed human experimentation forever.

Read More
682 Words | 3 Pages

But, like the jury said that the cancellation of the operation had the effect of shorting the child’s life, in which Phillips took the responsibility of trying to cure

Read More
677 Words | 3 Pages

However, the problem with his experiments was that they were conducted without obtaining informed consent from the participants. The patients did not know that Southam was injecting them with cancer cells to see how their bodies would react and had no interest in letting the patients know exactly what he was doing. “The deception was for [Southam’s] benefit- he was withholding information because patients might have refused to participate in the study if they’d known what he was injecting” (Skloot, p. 130). It is morally and ethically wrong to inject human beings with an illness that could eventually cause their death.

Read More
1437 Words | 6 Pages

”(Skloot, 2010, p. 50). Racism has since been abolished and is now considered discrimination; also it is illegal to do any medical procedure on uninformed patients. However in today’s society like the era before, everyone has their own opinion and although it is legally and socially unethical people can still be bias. Also the patients in the studies did not have informed consent. There are three things in which you need to have informed consent; knowing, voluntary and competency.(10/17/13)

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

“You’re sentenced in a jail and you got a date ahead of when you know you’re gonna be let loose” ( Kesey, page 190). The lifeguard that is talking to McMurphy say that being in jail is better than being in at the ward because you do not know when you are going to leave. After this McMurphy talks to Harding and says “Yes; chopping away the brain. Frontal-lobe castration. I guess if she can’t cut below the belt she’ll do it above”.

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

Code Of Ethics Regardless of any personal beliefs, Surgical Technologist have several professional standards to maintain when it comes to personal conduct and high patient care to uphold at all times. The entire medical team is responsible for keeping patient information confidential at all times, unless instructed not to by the patient. As part of the care team we need to respect and protect any legal, moral rights the patient may have.

Read More
121 Words | 1 Pages

There was nothing even remotely resembling ethics in the Tuskegee experiment. Starting with the lack of informed consent, when they decided not to inform the patients of their disease or lack of treatment. They allowed a curable disease to be passed of to wives, and participants children. The gross neglect of patients, all for a experiment with no scientific validity. They let these black men suffer tremendously with no actual regret nor remorse.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

Euthanasia- Gay Williams Gay-Williams presents an opposing argument against euthanasia. This reading made me really think about my stance on euthanasia. I personally have mixed feelings on this topic. Gay-Williams states that euthanasia is “inherently wrong” and is starting to become more accepted. One comment I have is that as science is advancing and new remedies are created, this thinking might be changing for some people.

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

Through the bioethics program at Columbia University, I intend to further investigate a few areas of interest. Surgical ethics is a significant area of interest and holds importance to me. I am interested in investigating the ethics of conducting research on the decisional capacity of patients who have

Read More
1252 Words | 6 Pages

Assisted suicide is a rather controversial issue in contemporary society. When a terminally ill patient formally requests to be euthanized by a board certified physician, an ethical dilemma arises. Can someone ethically end the life of another human being, even if the patient will die in less than six months? Unlike traditional suicide, euthanasia included multiple individuals including the patient, doctor, and witnesses, where each party involved has a set of legal responsibilities. In order to understand this quandary and eventually reach a conclusion, each party involved must have their responsibilities analyzed and the underlying guidelines of moral ethics must be investigated.

Read More
937 Words | 4 Pages

The argument that I am analyzing is found in Philippa Foot’s article Euthanasia. This specific section starts at the beginning on page 88. This argument starts once she talks about the true meaning of Euthanasia and the difficulty in how people see or perceive it. In Foot 's article, she wants to prove that an act of euthanasia is morally permissible, as long as you’re performing it for the right cause or reasons. Foot defines euthanasia as "a matter of opting for death for the good of the one who is to die."

Read More

More about Ethical Lobotomy Procedure: Freeman's Thought Process

Related Topics

Open Document