ipl-logo

Kantianism Vs Utilitarianism

731 Words3 Pages

Kantianism may be a normative ethical theory by Immanuel Kant within the eighteenth century. Kant’s deontological stance begins with the sovereignty of reason. philosopher was attempting to uncover an ethical system based mostly strictly on reason within the hope it might turn out an ethical philosophy that's objectively true and universally valid. philosopher thought it absolutely was necessary to base our actions on a reason as a result of that's the sole thanks to make sure that our morality is objective and in no method narcissistic. therefore Kantians would argue that the peace officer mustn't let the mob have the person as a result of it's against the universal ethical duties and rules which might forestall him from surrendering the suspect …show more content…

Kantians believe that to act from duty is to try and do therefore as a result of it's the correct issue to try and do and not for the other reason. The duty of the peace officer would be shield|to guard|to shield|to safeguard} the suspect man till he was found guilty and sentenced to a penalization and then he ought to protect him and not offer him up to the mob despite what the implications as Kantianism appearance at the motives and then the peace officer ought to follow and adjust his duties. However, if the person was guilty and particularly if the peace officer might be positive of this it may arguably be a distinct …show more content…

But, the explicit imperative would decree this concept this idea; the peace officer should shield the person and have him penalized as he was sentences to be not because the mob decides. the explicit imperative is, philosopher believes, one basic take a look at for distinctive virtuously applaudable maxims of actions that need duty alone. Maxims square measure general rules of behaviour which may be applied to specific things like ‘never lie’ and ‘never kill’. the explicit imperative portion of Kantianism has three any components to it; universal law formulation, finish in itself formulation, and kingdom of ends formulation. The universal law formulation states that a moral principle should, in essence, be capable of being applied to any individual within the same circumstances and not simply the individual being judged. during this case it might be truthful to mention the explicit imperative might be ‘protect those in your jail’ however not ‘protect those in your prison unless there's a mob World Health Organization needs to kill them and can kill you to try and do

Show More
Related
424 Words | 2 Pages

From attention to detail to point of view, these qualities supplement the overall theme of balancing personal duty and moral values. In general, it is important to follow personal moral values, such as respecting and acknowledging the value of life. However, in this situation, when many innocent people are exposed to a potential threat, it is necessary to fulfill your duty to protect, even if it opposes your values, for the greater

Read More
988 Words | 4 Pages

In Kantian terms, there lies a set of moral principles that is universal and continues to apply to all humankind no matter the context or situation. In the minds of someone who believes in this ethical theory, their decision is always motivated by goodwill and that end never justifies the means, it is all about duty. A person who stands with the supreme court decision and is in favor of banning abortion across all states is someone who believes in the kantian ethics

Read More
315 Words | 2 Pages

A modern law enforcement officer is taught to think critically and reflect on expected circumstances to possess some effective skills on leadership. Furthermore, law enforcement officers who has a strong problem solving skills and effective communication skills also develop community policing potentials. Improving a better understanding of leadership allows the public to respect the professionalism that a police officer upholds. Immanuel Kant’s ethical theories believe that an individual has the ability to make rational decision based on the action given to them (Kant 's Ethics, 2002). Immanuel Kant’s ethical theories are to illustrate the importance of duty and moral standards.

Read More
507 Words | 3 Pages

In conclusion, Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative, in my opinion, is the most appropriate approach to ethics and morals. It is an example of a deontological ethic that is based on reason. On the other hand, utilitarian ethics is an example of teleological ethics that uses both reasons and feelings in order to

Read More
154 Words | 1 Pages

The final ethical theory is Kant’s deontology. Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher who admire the stoics for their dedication to performing their duties and playing their part. He based his theory on duties, obligations, and rights. Its main focus is that everyone has an inherited right. It highlights the importance of respecting a person autonomy.

Read More
214 Words | 1 Pages

Libertarianism is a political philosophy that said that the state should interfere as little as possible with people. Utilitarians, differ from Libertarianism, because are primarily concerned with the advocating for human provision of a minimal level of well being and social support for legal resident and citizens. They maintained that society ought to be systematically arranged in whatever way that would best reached this end potentially defend the vase and achieve greater social equality for the needy. Utilitarians think that the right thing to do is whatever produces the greatest amount of happiness.

Read More
111 Words | 1 Pages

Discretion and discrimination are major ethical issues faced today in society. When people have discretion, their prejudices and perceptions of group of people, in this case, ex-convicts and minorities, make irradical and immoral decisions. Police officer’s discretion against a group of people is going to influence how they perform their job so if police are prejudiced toward a certain group of people, that group is not going to be treated or protected equally. This type of discrimination is shown through them enforcing the law different or even withholding the protections and benefits of the law from people. This unequal protection from the law is an ethical dilemma that should not be prevalent.

Read More
1385 Words | 6 Pages

The duty is the main concept in this theory, our emotions have no choice in this situation, no matter if we choose right

Read More
1279 Words | 6 Pages

Assignment #1 Review questions Chap. 1 p. 26: 1. A single standard of ethics cannot be applied to all criminal justice agencies. The world is too complex to legislate morality and ethics. The cultures that make up each part of the world are not the same.

Read More
706 Words | 3 Pages

Even though it is true that taking the life of another is not right, it is even truer that the punishment should fit the crime. The death penalty is an exercise of justice that promotes retribution for crime and moral punishment for those who choose to take human life. Also, it prevents society 's worse offenders from re-offending, and it provides justice for the victims whose lives were cut short without a second thought. To better understand why capital punishment is a justifiable act, Kant 's theory gives a clear and logical understanding of the eye for an eye approach. Additionally the utilitarian view also explains why capital punishment is justifiable in regards to comfort for the victim 's family and prevention of re-offending.

Read More
1222 Words | 5 Pages

Ethics and the search for a good moral foundation first drew me into the world of philosophy. It is agreed that the two most important Ethical views are from the world’s two most renowned ethical philosophers Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill. In this paper, I will explore be analyzing Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle and Kant’s Categorical Imperative. In particular, I want to discuss which principle provides a better guideline for making moral decisions. And which for practical purposes ought to be taught to individuals.

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

The AHA’s discussion of dialogue and truth connect to the ethical theory of Kantianism. Kantianism is a form of Deontology that provides us with the Universal Law Formula and the Humanity as an End in Itself Formula. The Universal Law Formula says that we should treat others in the way that we expect others to treat us. The Humanity as an End in Itself Formula explains that humans should never be used as a means to an end or we should simply respect humans. Through these formulas come the idea of imperfect and perfect duties.

Read More
1374 Words | 6 Pages

Hypothetical imperatives are duties that people ought to observe if certain ends are to be achieved. Categorical imperatives are the absolute and universal laws that guide moral actions. Kant believed that moral actions must be based on unconditional reasoning. Kant’s deontological principles of hypothetical imperatives and categorical imperatives have significantly influenced the medical field.

Read More
1228 Words | 5 Pages

Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are two of the most notable philosophers in normative ethics. This branch of ethics is based on moral standards that determine what is considered morally right and wrong. This paper will focus on Immanuel Kant’s theory of deontology and J.S. Mill’s theory of utilitarianism. While Mill takes a consequentialist approach, focused on the belief that actions are right if they are for the benefit of a majority, Kant is solely concerned with the nature of duty and obligation, regardless of the outcome. This paper will also reveal that Kantian ethics, in my opinion, is a better moral law to follow compared to the utilitarian position.

Read More
1515 Words | 7 Pages

Rational humans should be treated as an end in themselves, thus respecting our own inherent worth and autonomy to make our own decisions. This part of Kant’s ideology may limit what we could do, even in the service of promoting an overall positive, by upholding the principle of not using people with high regard, thus serving as a moral constraint. Deontology remains as the stronger ethical framework as it explicitly lists out how one should act morally through absolute, universal laws, and also by promoting not using others as a mere means, but rather as an end in itself. On the other hand, Utilitarianism, a consequentialist theory, stems from the idea that every morally correct action will produce the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people.

Read More

More about Kantianism Vs Utilitarianism

Related Topics

Open Document