ipl-logo

Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

984 Words4 Pages

Often teenage girls stress and struggle each morning to choose which pair of pants flatter them the best, which color accentuates their skin tone better, or which hoodie is the comfiest, yet no choice they have made can compare to Brutus’s choice between saving his best friend or the good of Rome. In the tragedy, “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony plans to kill Caesar in order to prevent him from inheriting the crown, as well as all the power to control Rome. Antony involved Marcus Brutus, Caesar’s best friend, to help him carry out his schemes because he believed that having all the power in one person’s hands would corrupt them. Once Brutus makes the decision that rescuing Rome is more important than his dearest friend, the …show more content…

Mark Antony formulates his words in the perfect way that replies to Brutus’s speech prior to his, contradicting every point Brutus attempts to make. The old form of rhetoric, created by Aristotle, consists of Ethos, Pathos, and Logos, each applying to contrasting points that is used to sway the audience. To start off, Ethos is used by Antony when he establishes that “he was [Antony’s] friend, faithful and just to [him]”, making it personal, as well as giving himself inside credibility (Shakespeare, III, ii, 87). Antony also lowers the value of Brutus’s ethos by stating over and over again, using repetition, that Brutus might not be as credible as he made it seem, …show more content…

While he is closing out with his speech, Antony shows the body of Caesar while saying “my heart is in the coffin there with Caesar”, in turn creating a very emotional feel by showing Caesar’s bloody body (Shakespeare, III, ii, 108). The way Mark Antony executed this device is similar to how fundraisers show pictures of victims to get the audience to care, rather than just showing statistics about poverty. With his final line, he creates a dramatic effect by forcing the audience to pause and reflect with him. He was able to have control over the crowd by commenting that “[he] must pause till it come back to [him]” in order to direct the audience (Shakespeare, III, ii, 109). Both of these devices form a sensational feeling on the listening audience to change the way they have been thinking about the situation by planting thoughts into their heads and merely connecting the dots for

Show More
Related
957 Words | 4 Pages

In Julius Caesar, both Antony and Brutus delivered languishing speeches using rhetorical devices to attract the audience and persuade the crowd that their opinions were correct and logical. Marcus Brutus used more of a scare tactic and threatened the people of Rome to challenge him. Mark Antony used more of a sentimental and emotional technique to appeal to the vulnerable audience. He speaks to the crowd, rather than above it as Brutus does in his lofty speech of honor. Mark Antony presented the more rhetorically effective speech using the vulnerability of the Roman citizen’s feelings and the techniques of pathos, plain folk, bandwagon and reverse psychology.

Read More
236 Words | 1 Pages

In my essay, I was able to use pathos, ethos, and logos effectively to interpret the ideas of power and how it affects one’s personal life. I used the technique of logos, by taking the information of Julius Caesar, Abraham Lincoln, and Adolf Hitler as evidence so I could have accurate conclusions. Also with the evidence and the leaders I mentioned in my essay, I stated Ethos, because it related to the idea that my ideas were credible based on my evidence. Ethos was also stated in the in-text citations and quotes, helping to make my essay credible that I got the information from a worthy source. I appealed to emotion with the technique of pathos, by creating sympathy for Brutus’s wife in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar.

Read More
349 Words | 2 Pages

depiction of logos due to the use of logic and tactical thinking although some may argue that Brutus used pathos in this situation. Continuing on in the soliloquy, Brutus states that if Caesar was allowed to live, Rome would have been made slaves. Because he, Brutus lived Rome so dearly, he had to take part in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar to protect the rights of the Roman citizens. On a side note, Julius Caesar should not have been murdered.

Read More
549 Words | 3 Pages

Anthony's many times throughout his speech mocks brutus to show the audience how they shouldn’t trust brutus. “and brutus is an honorable man” (III.ii.83-85), antony using pathos to show facts on why not to trust cesar. Throughout the speech antony uses literary devices to appeal to the audience and to show the connection in the speech so that the romans will find the antony's one more persuavies since he is appealing to

Read More
230 Words | 1 Pages

Between the two speeches given by Brutus and Marc Antony, Antony had the stronger speech. This is due to his effective use of the rhetorical devices ethos, pathos and logos, but most importantly his use of logos. Antony was the second to speak therefore being able to rebuttal most of what Brutus said. Antony uses logos very effectively when stating the actions of Caesar. “He hath brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill.”

Read More
638 Words | 3 Pages

So it is all on the line for Antony and Brutus. Brutus did a great job of using logos and lots of ethos in his speech, but most of his reasons to justify Caesar’s slaying were predictions of Caesar’s future behavior. Antony uses a lot of statements that are primarily pathos to persuade the crowd that the great Julius should still be alive. This is most of the reason why Antony’s address is the better of the two. Here are some of the fallacies that Brutus uses.

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar: a beloved man with a tragic and mysterious death to end his tale at the hands of people that he once considered close friends of his. In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar,” the audience gets to witness the conflicts that might have taken place behind closed doors, listening to the debates that took place between such as Mark Antony and Brutus. In the play, Antony tries to convince Brutus that Caesar deserves to be murdered. Near the end, Antony and Brutus both pay homage to Caesar at his funeral in front of the Roman civilians, with Antony delivering the most effective speech by fabricating a refined and potent speech that used rhetorical appeals to persuade the citizens of Rome. In the speech, Antony is trying to sway the crowd into agreeing with the motives for murdering Caesar by using logos to justify his actions.

Read More
807 Words | 4 Pages

In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare Rome is struck with utter disorder after certain characters use ethos, pathos and logos to manipulate the people of Rome. One character who uses ethos, pathos and logos is Cassius to manipulate Brutus into joining the conspirators. Brutus also uses ethos, pathos and logo to justify his killing of Caesar. Last, Mark Antony uses ethos, pathos and logo to manipulate the Plebeians against Brutus and the conspirators. Thus, Cassius, Brutus and Mark Antony all use ethos, pathos and logos to manipulate one another and bring the people of Rome to their sides, resulting in total chaos.

Read More
671 Words | 3 Pages

In Antony’s speech to the people, he speaks about Caesar over his dead body. His words make the commoners feel something, as opposed to Brutus,

Read More
1303 Words | 6 Pages

Upon writing this speech he asked to read it at his funeral. But his plan was to use his way of words and gain the people's trust to turn them against Brutus. Mark Antony uses rhetorical devices in his speech to sorta trick but also persuade the people to believe Caesar was not all that bad. An example of Antony doing this is when he said “what cause withholds you then to mourn for him” In act 3 scene 2.

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

Come I to speak in Caesars' funeral" (act 3 scene 2) this can show that Antony is not above the plebeians, since he had to have permission to speak, he's one of the commoners. He also uses ethos by saying " He was my friend, faithful and just to me." (act3 scene 2) antony says this to make Caesar look like a really good guy, to make sure the commoners know that Caesar was loyal and a good friend to Antony. This also makes Brutus and the rest of the conspirators look like they killed Caesar just to do it, for no good

Read More
868 Words | 4 Pages

Mark Antony’s Speech Shakespere is considered by many to be one of the greatest playwrights of the renaissance period entertaining playgoers of all social classes with his comedies and tragedies. Julius Caesar, one such tragedy written by Shakespeare, has within it many speeches; however, Mark Antony’s funeral speech that he gives after Julius Caesar is assassinated contains a myriad of examples of rhetorical argument techniques. In Act three, scene two of Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony uses ethos, pathos, and logos to turn a despairing and disoriented crowd of mourners into a volatile and rebellious crowd of rioters turned against Brutus and his co-conspirators.

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

“Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears” (3.2.70). This was the first sentence of a speech that would change the minds of hundreds of Romans. In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the demise of Julius himself leaves the city of Rome in shock, including his best friend, Mark Antony. In his funeral speech, he uses literary devices like ethos to show the ethical side of things, logos to show the logical thinking behind it all, and pathos to tug on people’s heart strings with emotions. Mark Antony gave a passionate speech that consisted of ethos, logos, and pathos to state facts on the situation that persuaded the citizens of Rome to make their opinions on Brutus and the other conspirators.

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

After reading excerpts from Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, write an essay that compares Brutus’ speech with Marc Antony’s speech and argues the effectiveness of the rhetorical devices (ethos, pathos, logos) used in each. Be sure to support your position with evidence from the texts. William Shakespeare writes a play about Julius Caesar’s assassination and the speeches his friends gave at his funeral. In the play, Brutus assassinated Caesar because he thought he was protecting Rome. He was saying that if Caesar got all the power he would most likely become vicious and make everyone his slaves.

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

In William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar, the tragedy of Julius Caesar’s death occurs. Mark Antony and Marcus Brutus each gave a funeral speech. While both the speeches were well spoken, Mark Antony’s ended up being the better speech. Antony’s better use and variety of ethos, pathos, and logos, his use of figurative language, and the comparison between Antony’s and Brutus’s speeches proves that Antony’s speech is in the end better than Brutus’s speech. Antony’s speech uses ethos to show everyone around him that he is their friend, and he understands what they are going through; also Antony uses ethos to get the citizens to listen to him, because while Brutus says he is honorable, Antony says that he is with them and where they stand in

Read More

More about Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

Related Topics

Open Document