More handpicked essays just for you.
The crusades a different point of view
Effects of crusade on eastern europe
The crusades a different point of view
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The crusades impacted the way we live today in many ways. In the outcome, there were both positives and negatives associated with the crusades. It was violent, deceased many, and turned cities into ruins but it also was a job opportunity for merchants and brought many new luxuries to certain places. Some motivation for people to fight in the crusades were different than its organizers. The original reason many wanted to come fight in the crusades is that it would relieve them of all of their sins.
1) The Albigensian Crusade is an example of one religion trying to remove the threat of another religion out of fear that one ideology would affect the other. This crusade is called to be one of the first genocides in European history for its gruesomeness and lack of humanistic behaviours. The Catholics of Northern France set up military campaigns to remove the perceived threat in Southern France. That threat to the Catholics at the time was the spread of Catharism.
Pope Urban II’s speech at Clermont in 1095 was a call to crusade given outdoors to the nobles, commoners and church leaders of the Western European Christians (the Franks). The people were moved by this speech and it changed history, launching the first crusade to capture Jerusalem from the Muslim Turks. After hearing Pope Urban II’s speech, thousands of Western European Christians were moved to embark on the dangerous journey and fight in the crusade. I believe the main reasons they were moved and persuaded to fight was; 1) they felt it was their Christian duty, 2) Pope Urban promised them absolution for their sins and 3) they felt compelled to defend Christianity, their holy land and the Eastern Christians.
The Crusades were expeditions done by the Roman Catholic Church in alliance with Middle-Age Kingdoms and Empires. There were a total of nine Crusades during the period of 1095 to 1291, led by Saladin, Richard I "the Lionheart" of England, Pope Urban II, Frederick I the Holy Roman Emperor, etc. At first, the Crusades were a way to fight back the Muslims for their conquest of Jerusalem. The idea of the Crusade was a very good marketing strategy by Pope Urban II. It was told that any Crusader would be rewarded a place in heaven, and forgiven their sins.
Some of the benefits a of the crusades can be a positive but mostly negative. Document five states that they were many battles between the colonies and some traded along the ways of the movement between the countries. This is relevant because even though there were some of the positive impacts,they were still other things that made it incomparable between them. Document seven,it states that the crusades were hard to maintain and often abused christians and jews.
The holy war which was not known as the crusades until the 16th century were a series of wars that were started by the pope of the Holy Catholic Church he thought that because of the “serious theological disagreement had split the Greek Church of Byzantium and the Roman Church of the West. The pope believed that a crusade would lead to strong Roman influence in Greek territories and eventually the reunion of the two churches.” (McKay 401) to help motivate the people and the upper echelon of the militaristic society Pope Urban II declared that all who participated in the crusade that all their sins would be forgiven without ever having to confess to a priest, while all at the same time declaring that the “Infidel” (which is a term both sides
Pope Urban had succeeded in shifting the anger of Christians from each other onto the Muslims and therefore united and encouraged them to take up the cross. His speech had been so powerful that according to Baldric of Dol Urban’s listeners’ had tears in their eyes and trembled at his words. However According to Asbridge The Muslims and the Catholics had been living amongst each other for centuries with little conflict and the Muslims had proven to be the more tolerant of other religious views this thus contradicts Urban’s portrayal of Muslims as “subhuman savages” and we can assume that Urban may have exaggerated and constructed what the Muslims in the East were doing as an act of desperation to create unity amongst Christians. Asbridge goes on to state that the crusades were “proactive rather than reactive, and the crusades were designed, first and foremost, to meet the needs of the papacy” suggesting that the threat Urban preached he felt from Muslims in the east was not actually present and was fabricated in order to establish authority of himself and the
A crusade was a medieval military expedition, there were several created by the Europeans to get back the Holy Land from the Muslims in the 11th, 12th, and 13th centuries. There were four European crusades talked about; 1st Crusade, 2nd Crusade, 3rd Crusade, and the Children’s Crusade. The 1st Crusade began in 1096 when Pope Urban II agreed to help take back the Holy Lands of Jerusalem from Muslims or the Turks. There were many battles throughout Western Europe, Byzantine and Islam which were mostly won by Christians.
The Muslim people were the ones being attacked and had opposing viewpoints of what was going on. The views of the crusades were vastly different from two of the largest religious groups of their time, the Christians and the Muslims. The Christians looked at the crusade as their religious and personal mission and duty. After all, the Christians were the ones who were leading the crusades and they were the ones who were the biggest advocates of them.
When investigating my question, what were the politics that started the first Crusade, I had to utilize a couple methods that historians use when investigating a topic. Those methods used by historians are the heuristic method, which is the identification of a source's relevance to a topic, and criticism; an evaluation of the values and limitations one's resource possesses. I used the heuristic method when searching for relevant material to use in my investigation, leading me to scrutinize resources used in my paper. I, also, used criticism when I evaluated my primary resources in the first portion of this investigation. Personally, I think scrutiny is important because it keeps the investigation honest.
The Crusades were successful failures because they did not meet many of their goals, but left lasting effects. The Crusades was an attempt by the Roman Catholic Church to regain the Holy Lands from the Muslims. They believed they were fighting for god and all sins would be forgiven and defend the Byzantine Empire from the Turks. The first Crusade (1096 -1099) was successful for the Christians because they had a clear and organized religious based purpose. Crusaders the Christian armies were able to hold Jerusalem and in the process led to a massacre of Jews.
The Crusades of the Middle Ages, while uniting Europe under a common goal, caused a rift between Christians and adherents of other faiths, this along with their brutality caused the crusades to become a controversial episode of European history. The Fourth Crusade, which took off in 1201 and ended tragically in 1204 might be the most controversial of them all. The crusading army, mostly made up of Frenchmen and Venetians, had Egypt as its initial target. However, the crusade was diverted, first to Zara and later to Constantinople. This meant that instead of fighting Muslims, the crusaders ended up battling against fellow Christians.
Ultimately the group of wars known as the Crusades achieved very little gain for the Christian forces, other than a series of "own-goals" (such as the sacking of Byzantium). So, despite a few short-term gains, the ultimate "winners" were the Muslim forces. Persia at the time was part of the Seljuk Empire I believe and therefore was certainly a supporter of the Muslim forces during this
The Medieval society gave birth to the Christian army during The High Middle Ages of History. The populace of the Christian army had values that resembled those of individuals from the medieval society. Many people from the medieval society were sinners who had joined the army to demonstrate their sorrow for their sins. The army encouraged all paths of life to join them in their crusades. The younger populace without inheritance and lack of future commonly joined the Christian army for the opportunity to gain land by conquest.
Looking at a wider perspective, when the Christians had taken over Jerusalem from the Muslims, the Islamic leader was urging his people to retake what they believed was rightfully theirs. The quote “God has received nothing from us in the way of adoration” illustrates how the Muslims wanted to demonstrate religious devotion to their God. As time went on, losing the Holy Land would be too shameful for Christendom, so with the Pope’s blessing, dozen of thousands of men marched toward Jerusalem. It is visible that the Crusades were primarily caused by religious devotion. Popes had used the Crusades as a tool in order to achieve and fulfil religious, political and economic aspects.
