ipl-logo

Euthanasia And Physician Assisted Suicide Case Study

1116 Words5 Pages

This debate cuts across complex and dynamic aspects such as, legal, ethical, human rights, health, religious, economic, spiritual, social and cultural aspects of the civilized society. Here we argue this complex issue from both the supporters and opponents’ perspectives, and attempts to present the plight of the sufferers and their caregivers. The objective is to discuss the subject of euthanasia from the medical and human rights perspective. This study focusses on the two very absolute rights of every human being: “Right to Life” and “Right to Die” with dignity.
Keywords: [human rights, arguments, euthanasia, right to life, right to die]
Euthanasia: “Right to Life” vs “Right to Die”
The word Euthanasia, originated in Greece means a good death …show more content…

It’s time to be gone.” For this terminally ill person, physician assisted death is how he will go.
Physician assisted death (PAD) is the law in 2 states, Oregon, 1994, and Washington State, 2008. A terminally ill patient residing in these states – competent and not clinically depressed – can ask for and receive from his doctor a prescription for medicine that, if ingested, ends life. PAD differs from euthanasia because in euthanasia the medical practitioner dispenses the lethal amount into the patient.
Although the popular term “right to die” has been used as a label to describe the debate over end of life decisions, the underlying issues include a variety of legal concepts. For instance, “right to die” could include issues of suicide, passive euthanasia – allowing a person to die by refusal or withdrawal of medical intervention, assisted suicide – providing a person the means of committing suicide, active euthanasia – killing another, and palliative care – providing comfort care which accelerates the death process. Therefore, physician assisted suicide appears to be a blend of assistive suicide or active euthanasia undertaken by a licensed …show more content…

It could send a wrong message that it is better to be dead than sick or disabled. Euthanasia is a rejection of the importance and value of human life. People who support euthanasia often say that it is already considered permissible to take human life under some circumstances such as self-defense – but they miss the point that when one kills for self-defense they are saving an innocent life – either their own or someone else’s whereas with euthanasia no one’s life is being taken – life is only taken.
• Euthanasia encourages vulnerable people to end their lives. The will power of a patient to fight through a fatal disease might decline if given an option of choosing death which might seem like a simpler solution at that moment. Patients who are ill or dependent often feel worthless and a burden to their family and loved ones. An overburdened health care system limits the quality of care and may create pressure on patients, making them choose death.
• Possible Recovery: It is very hard to predict whether the disease is not curable. Accepting euthanasia means ruling out the chance of a miracle happening in some cases where patients have fully recovered from deadly diseases.
• No Assurance of Voluntariness: Even if patients appear to authorize euthanasia we cannot be sure that their consent is truly voluntary as they might not be in the proper

Show More
Related
1246 Words | 5 Pages

Commentary On A Medical Dilemma Physician-assisted suicide is a large moral controversy in the medical field. Jukka Varelius explains the key points about the dilemma on whether medical patients should have the right to ask doctors to terminate their lives, in order to end their suffering. In “Voluntary Euthanasia, Physician-Assisted Suicide, and the Right to do Wrong”, the author addresses how assisting suicide is morally wrong in our society, but yet patients insist that they have the moral right to end their lives if they are in agony and facing significant torment due to their ill status. Jukka, in his point of view, outlines the multiple problems that go along with the main conflict, such as should a doctor be forced to end a suffering patient’s life even if the physician does not wish to do so and should the patient have the ability to ask for euthanasia even if there is still a possibility that the patient’s status can improve. Mr. Varelius does a successful job portraying the key points in this conflict, but does not strongly support any side in the

Read More
1971 Words | 8 Pages

Introduction Physician assisted suicide is “The voluntary termination of one's own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician ”. Physician assisted suicide is illegal under the terms of the Suicide Act 1961 and is punishable by up to 14 years' imprisonment. However, more than 100 Britons with terminal or incurable illnesses have gone to the Swiss centre Dignitas to die and none of the relatives and friends involved in the cases has been prosecuted. Despite physician assisted suicide being illegal in Britain, in 1997 the US state of Oregon licensed doctors to supply lethal drugs to terminally ill patients who had less than six months to live, and were acting voluntarily. Up to 2013 there

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

However, if the option of physician assisted suicide were available to patients, they would have the option of saving their families a significant amount of money, retaining both dignity and rectitude. As the current system is now, terminally ill patients suffer and wither away uselessly until their deaths, all the while seizing hundreds of thousands of dollars from their families. Although it may seem inhumane to encourage the terminally ill to die instead of getting treatment, it must also be taken into consideration that they are already going to die. Euthanasia would simply make their death meaningful and virtually painless for the patient and economically painless for

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

To put your life in someone else’s hands is a hard thing to do. You first have to establish a sense of trust and secondly be at peace with whatever decision they make. Having the ability to end your life on your terms is a blessing. Physicians Assisted Death (PAD) refers to physicians aiding patients in ending their life by prescribing a lethal dosage of medication and/or informing patients on how to properly take their own life (Leming). Though I believe that PAD is a blessing, I am still on the fence about whether or not I am for or against it.

Read More
718 Words | 3 Pages

Physician-assisted suicide(PAS) attributes to the process in which a physician administers potentially lethal medications to his anguished patient possessing terminal illness, at their request, for the purpose of ending their own life. To be given this opportunity, the patient must be competent, terminally ill, and physically and mentally adequate to self-administer the aid-in-dying drug. They must be diagnosed and have six months or less to live. It is also commonly referred to as physician-assisted death(PAD), physician aid-in-dying, or physician administered hastened death. It is cruel and unnecessary to force a terminally ill patient to suffer through a prolonged, undignified death and have their last moments full of fear and pain.

Read More
531 Words | 3 Pages

HS 4812 Bioethics Discussion Post Unit 8 Compare and contrast euthanasia with physician-assisted suicide. Discuss your stance on physician-assisted suicide. Due to developments in biomedical research as well as the emergence of new fields in evidence-based medicine and bioethics, end-of-life care is a subject that is becoming more and more relevant. Medical professionals frequently discuss euthanasia and assisted suicide, two concepts that can be both comforting and upsetting depending on the situation. It has been possible to evaluate situations that have helped build helpful definitions for the legal regulation of palliative care and public policies in the various health systems thanks to the evolution of these terms and the events connected

Read More
1301 Words | 6 Pages

Physician aid in dying (PAD) can therefore be defined as a licensed physician providing a patient with a lethal dose of a drug that the patient may use to end their own life. Furthermore, patients in this definition are terminally ill and request the aid of a physician voluntarily. Keeping this in mind, I will now move towards exploring the types of cases where it is currently permissible to kill a

Read More
462 Words | 2 Pages

On the other hand, many feel that it should be an option. Physician – assisted suicide legally give a person the right to end their life with the help and guidance of a medical practitioner by prescribing lethal doses of drugs to a patient. Many confuse physician – assisted suicide with euthanasia, euthanasia is where the practitioner himself would inject the lethal drug into the patient, and decide when it will be injected. In physician – assisted suicide, the patient himself decides that he or she wants the lethal medication, and the patient gets to choose when he or she wants to ingest the lethal medication

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

Medical euthanasia involves the deliberate ending of a human life, and legalizing it can lead to cases of abuse. According to a study conducted by the British Medical Journal, countries that have legalized euthanasia have experienced cases of involuntary euthanasia, where patients were euthanized without their consent or against their will (Materstvedt et al. 225). This shows that legalizing euthanasia can create a slippery slope, where patients who are vulnerable and unable to make informed decisions about their own lives may be euthanized without their

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction Euthanasia also known as assisted suicide is giving patients the right to choose whether they want to live or die. This procedure is administered on patients on life support machines and those with terminal illnesses and there is no hope for recovery and those undergoing much stress and pain. The topic of euthanasia is significant in health care because, this procedure is done by health care professionals. In addition, it is significant to healthcare because of the practical arguments for and against euthanasia.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

Euthanasia has its roots of discussion that are predominantly ethical in nature and has been a topic of debate for centuries. It is difficult to argue its justification since people have varying perspectives on the topic that stem from their morals and respective beliefs systems. There is no definitive answer to this debate. Many studies have been conducted to this day about euthanasia, and their findings may clarify the debate. Doctors, family members of a euthanized person, and the community all have their outlooks on euthanasia, much of which falls whether it should be legal or not.

Read More
771 Words | 4 Pages

Experts debate whether euthanasia should be a legal option for the terminally ill. As advocates say euthanasia should be an option to avoid needless pain, opponents argue that is morally wrong and violates the medical code. Euthanasia is one of the most controversial topics, and it has been a topic of concern among society. “Euthanasia is the act or practice of ending the life of a person suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition. Euthanasia differs from assisted suicide in that with euthanasia the doctor can provide and administer the drugs that are used to end a life, whereas with assisted suicide the doctor may only provide the drugs, not administer them”(“Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia Timeline”).

Read More
1321 Words | 6 Pages

The Right to Die has been taking effect in many states and is rapidly spreading around the world. Patients who have life threatening conditions usually choose to die quickly with the help of their physicians. Many people question this right because of its inhumane authority. Euthanasia or assisted suicide are done by physicians to end the lives of their patients only in Oregon, Washington, Vermont, Montana, New Mexico and soon California that have the Right to Die so that patients don’t have to live with depression, cancer and immobility would rather die quick in peace.

Read More
1466 Words | 6 Pages

The act of euthanising somebody can either be voluntary, in which the person believes their life is not worth living and asks for their life to be ended, or non-voluntary, in which they are unable to do so, and the decision on whether to end their life rests on doctors and family. Furthermore, there are different ways in which it could be performed: through medical intervention, (deliberately ending the patient’s life using medical equipment, such as through lethal injection), or medical non-intervention, (not making any efforts to prolong their life). Both will inevitably end the patient’s life, however, not

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

In a few nations there is a divisive open discussion over the ethical, moral, and legitimate issues of euthanasia. The individuals who are against euthanasia may contend for the holiness of life, while defenders of euthanasia rights accentuate mitigating enduring, substantial respectability, determination toward oneself, and individual autonomy. Jurisdictions where euthanasia or supported suicide is legitimate incorporate the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Estonia, Albania, and the US states of Washington. CLASSIFICATION OF EUTHANASIA Euthanasia may be characterized consistent with if an individual

Read More

More about Euthanasia And Physician Assisted Suicide Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document