ipl-logo

Euthanasia Western Argument

603 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Arguments for and against euthanasia

The fourth common Western argument in favor of euthanasia is the argument of self-determination. According to the precious Western value of autonomy, the individual must be free to decide on the things that matter much to him or her. As decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, education, etc. The decision on how and when to die is one of the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime. Therefore we have the right to die; some even claim that it is a human right, a negative right (the corresponding obligation is non-intervention in suicide attempts) and a positive law (which is suicide correlative duty of care). After all, my life is mine in Confucian values, individual autonomy has never been a cherished value; nor has there been any thought of human rights. …show more content…

According to Confucian values you should opt for a good death (good in the moral sense), even actively pursuing. Since "ought" implies "can", that in some circumstances a person must commit suicide implies that the person is morally permissible to commit suicide. However, the Confucian echo argument for euthanasia is the weakest here. The Western argument has to do with the permissibility of suicide and euthanasia, while Confucian ethics deals with the inadmissibility of not committing suicide. In other words, the Western argument concerns the admissibility of any suicide, regardless of value. Confucian ethics, however, deals only with the legality of a suicide, which is considered morally worthy. The Western argument is about the right to euthanasia, but only Confucian ethics has to do with righteousness, the correct behavior, or proper exercise of the right to euthanasia. Moreover, the ideas of self-ownership and individual sovereignty are totally unrelated to the Confucian

Show More
Related
67 Words | 1 Pages

The concept and ideology behind Physician-Assisted Suicide within the contemporary generation has become an exceptionally sensitive and controversial issue as multiple factors conglomerate to define if Physician-Assisted Suicide is justifiable within the grounds of ethical understanding and moral principles. The idea concerning PAS is based on the grounds of rational and irrational thinking as in if death is a rational choice above all other alternatives (Wittwer 420).

Read More
336 Words | 2 Pages

As a daughter, granddaughter and friend, I am thoroughly concerned about the people surrounding me and their well-being. Just as any other family member or friend would feel about me, I would always want them to be happy and healthy. If these traits could no longer be an option in their lives, I would never want them to suffer for any reason. Assisted suicide is a deeply controversial topic in which I feel very strongly to share my view point on. It should be considered just as much of a crime to make a person live who does not wish to continue under their circumstances, as it is to take a life without consent.

Read More
2030 Words | 9 Pages

In his article ‘A Right to Self-Termination?’ David Velleman brings up the topic of the right to die and elaborates his view on the subject. Two broad principles are stated by Velleman and he goes on to reject the first principle and accept the second principle. The first principle is that “a person has the right to make his own life shorter in order to make it better… ”the second principle is that there is “a presumption in favor of deferring to a person's judgment on the subject of his own good.

Read More
1714 Words | 7 Pages

During the ancient Greek and Roman times’ way before Christianity emerged Euthanasia was not even a matter of concern or issue because human life was not valued as it is today. Many abortions and mercy killing were done and even thought the Hippocratic Oath prohibited physicians from giving a lethal drug to patients or any persons if asked for or not only a few followed the oath. At the time many people advocated for it and physicians acted on it as well, and now people of the 21st century continue to ask for it although the doctors are not as ignorant on the issue as before. According to Medical News Today euthanasia, has an arguable definition of whether it is a death/suicide in a painless manner, however the ignore the fact that they are

Read More
1252 Words | 6 Pages

Even though assisted suicide was not discussed throughout the sixteen to eighteen hundreds, ethical philosophers investigated the roots of human morals in an attempt to create an overarching rule that would help determine if “death with dignity” is morally justified. One such philosopher is Immanuel Kant, who in his Metaphysics of Morals, argues his belief in deontological ethics. Kant believes that “good actions” are those that follow your moral duty based upon the categorical imperative. According to Kant, the categorical imperative is a golden rule that states that any moral action must be a part of the universal law.

Read More
937 Words | 4 Pages

Some argue that for Euthanasia, “Once legalized, euthanasia will not be used just for those facing serious illnesses, but those who are depressed.” (Mezban) Past philosophers like Immanuel Kant and John Locke were opposed suicide. For this reason, they viewed euthanasia as suicide, regardless of how much pain or suffering the person was dealing

Read More
1188 Words | 5 Pages

This essay suggest that active euthanasia should be supported. This essay elaborate the statement in three argument. Firstly, according to utilitarianism, active euthanasia can produces greatest net pleasure and happiness. Secondly, some philosopher Mary Anne Warren and Frances Kamm states that the practice of active euthanasia is kind and merciful, which allow people

Read More
902 Words | 4 Pages

According to Oxford Dictionaries, euthanasia is “the practice of killing without pain a person who is suffering from a disease that cannot be cured” (Oxford). It derives from the Greek words, ‘eu’ meaning ‘goodly or well’ and ‘thanatos’ meaning ‘death’. The major controversy, however, is whether euthanasia is more ethical than it is unethical.. Those who do not understand the proper definition, contradict the idea and believe that it is against humanity to take a person’s life without permission. The utilitarian ethical theory defines euthanasia by implying that the normative ethics of an act maximising total benefit and reducing suffering proves its validity and correctness (Scherer, Simon 53).

Read More
1416 Words | 6 Pages

1. Introduction: Euthanasia is one of the most sensitive issues in the medical ethics (Alfzali, 2010), that has many complex and dynamics aspects such as, health, human rights ,spiritual, legal, ethical, social and cultural aspects of the civilized society ( Math & Chaturvedi, 2012) Euthanasia is a Greek word which mean " a good death", it is the practice of causing death with least amount of suffering to the patient ( Biswas& Sengupta, 2010). Euthanasia types are varied from active ( administer something to cause death), to passive (withholding life support measures ); voluntary (with consent form), to involuntary ( without consent form), and physician aid ( physician prescribe medication to the patient in a way to cause death) ( Math & Chaturvedi,

Read More
3243 Words | 13 Pages

Introduction The controversy over euthanasia has been and still is monumental. Coming from the Greek word euthanatos, meaning good death, good being a technical philosophical term. Euthanasia is the termination of a very ill(usually terminal) patient’s life for the sake of ending their suffering. Weather it be euthanasia or not, the debate on whether this subject is right or wrong has been going on for decades, even centuries.

Read More
869 Words | 4 Pages

Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide, is the act of permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured patients. This is never suggested by the caretaker rather than requested by the patient or their family. Few areas such as the Netherlands have already legalized this practice. This debate, as split as a fork in the road, is over whether or not this approach should be legalized worldwide on stances regarding religion, ethics, and self choice.     I see this as being extremely unethical on both religious and social morality levels.

Read More
1075 Words | 5 Pages

Euthanasia is usually used to refer to active euthanasia, and in this sense, euthanasia is usually considered to be criminal homicide, but voluntary, passive euthanasia is widely non-criminal. Voluntary Euthanasia is conducted with the consent of the patient while Involuntary Euthanasia is conducted against the will of the patient. Beginning with the philosophical aspects of euthanasia we must first understand the importance of the sanctity of life. Human life is sacred because God made humankind in His own image, and that each individual human

Read More
2027 Words | 9 Pages

People may ask “Why is it the right thing to do?” In order for people to have an answer to that question they must first know what Euthanasia is and how that if you have the mind set of all life is precious like Kant’s exert in the article of euthanasia chapter three of contemporary moral issues you are being selfish. According to Dictionary.com the definition of Euthanasia is “mercy killing. the act of putting to death painlessly or

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

In a few nations there is a divisive open discussion over the ethical, moral, and legitimate issues of euthanasia. The individuals who are against euthanasia may contend for the holiness of life, while defenders of euthanasia rights accentuate mitigating enduring, substantial respectability, determination toward oneself, and individual autonomy. Jurisdictions where euthanasia or supported suicide is legitimate incorporate the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Estonia, Albania, and the US states of Washington. CLASSIFICATION OF EUTHANASIA Euthanasia may be characterized consistent with if an individual

Read More
1149 Words | 5 Pages

The act of euthanasia, whether active or passive, is heavily obstructed in the medical field. Through medical ethics, the act of passive euthanasia is condoned by withholding treatment and thus, allowing the patient to die. Without any direct contact with the patient, the doctor is not considered as the cause of death. Thus, the medical field views passive euthanasia as of lesser and more permissible value in comparison to active euthanasia. In the statement made by the House of Delegates of the American Medical Association, they perceive this as contrary to mercy killing, as it is, the cessation of the employment of extraordinary means to prolong the life of the body when there is irrefutable evidence that biological death is imminent is the decision of the patient and/or his immediate family.

Read More

More about Euthanasia Western Argument

Related Topics

Open Document