According to Berger and Luckmann, life can be interpreted in the following way: “Everyday life presents itself as a reality interpreted by man and subjectively meaningful to them as a coherent world”. Briefly said, this section examines the sociological implications found in every day life. It can be argued that is rather intersubjective, and as such, empirical. On the other hand, its empirical capacity makes it not scientific. However, the common-sense understandings are, by nature, pre-scientific or quasi-scientific, but nevertheless, they are functional and pervasive. In order to analyse the everyday life, the authors of this book take a phenomenological approach. Furthermore, they argue that the everyday reality is postulated as the best reality. They argue that the reality is always intentional, and that different objects confront consciousnesses as different reality. Everyday reality seems to be ordered and independent, and in its structure, it is …show more content…
It can be said that this case illustrates another sense in which anonymity can be constructed, and that it can lead to dehumanization. This level of distancing is rather important in online interactions, or in case of characters in games. Out of this, we can suggest that the way to encourage identity is to create a sense of here and now within the social context. Furthermore, in case of face-to-face situations, there is the greatest room to share information. And language, as means of sharing this information, as such becomes a vast repository for accumulations of meanings and experiences. They argue that language originates and has its primary references to everyday life. Language forces social interactions into patters and integrated them into a meaningful reality, which includes spatial, temporal and social