Evidence For The Trial Of Mary Maloney

837 Words4 Pages

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, my name is Zainab. I'm the prosecutor of the Mary Maloney crime . On a mission to prove that Mary Maloney is guilty of murder. The crime takes place in Rocheport ,Missouli. January 2, 1954, in the house. Mary Maloney 23 years married. Accused of killing her husband Mr. patrick. The particular reason for the crime was that he wanted to get divorce. He was murdered by a piece of lamb that could be extracted very easily later, in the most ideal manner. Additionally, Mary presented herself as the very last person who could have committed the crime.

The crime might seem unreliable without being purposely so. But that's not true.Mary carefully arranged everything. Mary wed Patrick, a detective, in order to protect herself from her previous crimes. That didn't work out well for her because he discovered it soon after they got married. At the time, he …show more content…

She had to first gather herself and admit that she had killed him. The next action she took was to cover up the crime. She left the house and headed to the nearby grocery store. She started a conversation with the worker who is very familiar with them. The reason for that was that she required relevant evidence in case the cops arrived. And after Mary had planted, she returned home and pretended to be shocked. She then made a call to the police, asking them to investigate the crime. She had to do nothing more than watch while they looked for information on the case but could discover none. The lamb she used was the only piece of events that was relevant to the case. But as we've already mentioned, she was aware that the lamb was edible and simple to convert. So she cooked the meat and in a very emotional act, asked the policeman who was friends with her husband to eat it for her, while she’s giggling in the living room, not feeling any