ipl-logo

Example Of Larry Servedio Case

619 Words3 Pages

In today's era, when a criminal is charged for various crimes their given a shortcut to justice by simply accepting a plea deal. In this case, Larry Servedio faces multiple felonies: first-degree kidnapping, first-degree rape, third-degree rape, third-degree criminal sexual act, third-degree criminal mischief, criminal impersonation, second-degree grand larceny, and second-degree strangulation. Servedio was also indicted for several misdemeanor charges: first-degree harassment, second-degree aggravated harassment, second-degree menacing and torturing and injuring an animal. If Mr. Servedio goes to trial and is able to prove his innocence of the charges pressed against him, then he is a free man and all charges get dropped. Yet, if Mr. Servedio …show more content…

The upside of accepting a plea deal usually involves the defendant's pleading guilty to a lesser charge, or to only one of several charges. The agreements allow prosecutors to turn their attention and resources on other cases, and reduce the number of trials that judges need to attend. Though by accepting a plea deal one pleads guilty to one charge which usually results on your record forever because you plead guilty and didn't take your chance of proving your innocence by going to trial. For example if Larry Servedio did not want to accept his plea deal of two consecutive state prison terms of seven-and-a-half years by pleading guilty to two felony counts of second-degree kidnapping and go to trial he would face the possibility of losing the case and be sentenced to longer terms in prison. For the prosecution it saves them time but most important it helps the judges not overcrowd prisons by sentencing criminals to short terms which usually keeps them within their county lines. Though the prosecution also closes the deal by agreeing to a plea deal which results in not be able to charge the criminal with several

Show More
Related
280 Words | 2 Pages

In other words, the case is discharged but Klopfer could still be prosecuted later on. The prosecutor

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

But a plea of guilty is not invalid just because entered to avoid the possibility of the death penalty, and here, the petitioner's plea of guilty met the standard of

Read More
177 Words | 1 Pages

One simple mistake can cost you five years in federal prison and $250,000 fine. Steven Lopez-Bender now learned to not mysteriously wave a green laser from an apartment window. Currently is in court put on trial for his case A helicopter pilot noticed the laser while 1,000 feet in the air. As the helicopter was going to land it was hit a fourth time. Since October twelve out of 5,352 lasers have been struck in New Jersey.

Read More
1080 Words | 5 Pages

Crime, Law, Administration of Justice Professor: Kelly McGeever 04/25/18 Topic- Reflection on lock-in by John Pfaff Provide your reflection on the book and argument The justice system in America caused mass incarceration to become overpopulated from the 1970s to 2000. The reason being people were sentenced for more minor crimes which resulted in prisons to become overcrowded. Based on the book Lock In by John Pfaff, the three main reasons causing mass incarceration in America were; long sentences, war and drugs, and prosecutors.

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

For the defendant, the most significant benefit to plea bargaining is to take away the uncertainty of a criminal trial and to avoid the maximum sentence. Society also benefits from plea bargaining since the agreements lessen court congestion and free up prosecutors to handle more cases. The Cons of Plea

Read More
483 Words | 2 Pages

When a person enters into a plea bargain agreement after coviented of a crime, that person who is being prosecuted have to make importants decisions. One of the most key decisions is how that person plead (Guilty or Not).“A plea is formal statement made on behalf of an accused person or made by the accused in court in response to the charge made against him” (Martin, 2003). Before a defendant plea Guilty or Not he/she have to enters into a plea bargains. A plea bargains are an agreement in a criminal case between the accuse person (defendant) and prosecutor usually involves the defendant pleading guilt in order to get reduced sentence, in stead of the case going before a jury. When a defendant accept a plea bargain he/she is giving up their Sixth Amendment to the United State Constituation.

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

In the United States court system, many criminal cases are not resolved in a timely manner. One of the more common ways in which many cases are resolved quickly is through plea bargaining. Plea bargaining is defined as an agreement between defense attorneys and prosecutors. (Spohn & Hemmens, 2012) Alschuler (1979) describes plea bargaining as the self-conviction act of a defendant. Today, approximately ninety percent of defendants plead guilty because of plea bargaining.

Read More
737 Words | 3 Pages

If there wasn't any plea bargaining, courts would be overcrowded and forced to be shut down. It is an advantage for the defense since it will be less work required on their part (Tapscott, 2017). Because plea bargains are much quicker and require less work, it keeps the cases moving and courtrooms unclogged. This works for both prosecutor and defendant since the case would close quickly allowing them to move on to bigger, serious cases. The benefit of agreeing to a plea bargain is that it de clogs the courts and the overcrowded jails.

Read More
331 Words | 2 Pages

• The Constitution is weakened by the excessive use of plea-bargaining to avoid a trial. Research has shown that criminal defendants who exercise their Sixth Amendment right to trail by jury are more severely punished than those who accept plea bargains (Devers, 2011, p. 2). It is assumed that plea-bargaining weakens the criminal justice system by allowing violent criminals to plea out of serious charges and putting the disadvantaged and potentially innocent or partially innocent in a position where exercising their constitutional right to a trial by jury is too risky of an option. Prosecutors are required by the state to carry the burden and prosecute the accused.

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

Plea Bargaining is the most effective tool of prosecutors to minimize the time required to obtain convictions. Around ninety percent of cases are concluded using plea bargaining. (Barkan and Bryjack, Page 2) This process moves cases through the system quickly and prevents the need to add more judges and court systems if these cases were to go to trial. (Barkan and Bryjack, Page 249) From the judge and prosecutors point of view, this is a necessary and effective method of managing caseloads.

Read More
1023 Words | 5 Pages

A topic such as a plea bargain has many supporters and opponents. Because "plea bargaining is responsible for 97 percent of federal felony convictions" (Lat), it is an essential topic to research and discover whether or not it should remain in place and the impact it has already had on the judicial system. But first, what is "plea bargaining? " Plea bargaining is when a defendant is at risk of high sentencing or punishment but is faced "with an opportunity to plead guilty to a lesser charge or the original charge with less than the maximum sentence" (Dever).

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

People plead guilty for crimes that are not committed by them to avoid trial, but by doing so the right decision wasn’t made.

Read More
357 Words | 2 Pages

The federal charges Devries face was credit card fraud, money laundering, and embezzlement. The crimes stated above carry 121 months in prison, restitution, and other charges. Everyone in the community wanted to max for each charge, however the suspect made a deal with the state federal prosecutor. Under the circumstances, the deal stood for Devries to serve 110 months in a federal state prison without a chance for parole. The prison’s sentence occurred to be lite from the sentence that was requested by law.

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

For those in prison, those who snitch saying the defendant confessed, testifying can be a bargaining chip; the state will often reduce sentence time or

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

Since the courts are backlogged and many public defenders and judges being overworked, this causes plea bargaining to be used repeatedly. According to Walker et al. (2018), plea bargaining leaves many people no option but to plea guilty even when this is not their best option. This is due to a multitude of reasons but mainly to receive a lesser charge. For example, a felony and little time in jail may be better than risking multiple felonies and an excessive amount of time in jail.

Read More

More about Example Of Larry Servedio Case

Related Topics

Open Document