`The Crucible' written by Arthur Miller is a great example of an allegory which explores the conflict existing between individual choices and social expectations. In Salem the society may have power over certain individuals such as Mary Warren but not over strong willed characters such as Abigail and Proctor. This community holds power over individuals who fear other individuals and is made up of a dominant group. Miller uses this idea to make a comparison to McCarthyism in the 1950's. During this time in McCarthyism the government had most authority over America and almost brainwashed them, while in Salem people were ruled over by the Church and Court. Miller conveys this in `The Crucible' to strengthen and prove the purpose of the play. In this play …show more content…
This individual rejects to have his third child baptised and rarely attends the Church, representing him as a "Christian" by name. In the play, Salem follows a theocracy government where the society is formed by religious belief. This makes Proctor stand out awkardly and dangerously as he is separate from this society. This independent character, has no respect for Parris's station and insults the Reverand when he sacrcastically says, " I must find it and join it". Hatred is shown as he refers to joining the faction against Reverand Parris. The `Christian' man sees "no light of God" in the minister, exposing his hatred for him and indicating his version of religion he promotes. This is quite ironic, as the audience is already aware that Proctor has fallen short of his own high standards. His prejudice against Parris reflects the hypocrisy which is still residing within him. Proctor has no faith or trust in Parris as he refuses to let him "lay his hand upon my baby". This uneducated character is initiating this segragation from society and causing suspicions. Ultimately, Miller seems