ipl-logo

Why Is Entdeckungland Be Considered An Asymmetric Federalism?

1187 Words5 Pages

Within this type of federal state, there is symmetric and asymmetric federalism. Symmetric federalism exits when the federal state and central government share equal powers. The United States constitution, which follows symmetric federalism, allows for this equal power situation to occur. On the other hand, asymmetric federalism exists when some of the federal state units have more powers than other federal states relative to the central government. This occurs when a nation is full of different desires and needs by each province or state. For this reason, Entdeckungland should be considered an asymmetric federal state because it varies in needs and wants. Governments in places such as Canada and Belgium use asymmetric federalism. In Canada, …show more content…

In parallel with Canada, Entdeckungland has provinces that all have different resources and are successful for different reasons. For example, the inland provinces are more successful for their military strength and stability while the provinces closer to the coast are more successful because of the resources such as oil that are accessible. While the inland provinces have success in terms of stability, they are poorer than those with oil because oil is a resource and therefore brings in revenue. To alleviate this issue, asymmetric federalism can be used to perhaps give one of the areas, such as the inland provinces, special access to government funding to receive more money and keep the military up and running. In the costal regions, citizens can be given certain government programs in order to be ready for an attack, especially coming in from the ocean, which they are prone to. Clearly, asymmetric federalism can help the provinces to work together by filling in gaps of what is needed with some government …show more content…

Constitutional review is vital. It is the power of an establishment to nullify legislation, government decisions, and other acts of the command that violate constitutional rules, such as rights. It has been created in order to defend the omnipotence of the constitution and the rights contained within. Since Entdeckungland now will focus on the rights of the people and become a minimalist democracy, the promises for human rights to the people must be upheld, thereby possessing the need for this type of review. The new nation will follow the American Model of constitutional review, suggesting that any law can be declared unconstitutional by any judge at any time. Because it can be carried out at any time, it is referred to as judicial review. In this model, the branches are separate by equal branches of government, allowing the separation of powers in Entdeckungland to be kept strong in all areas, not having any fall off the wagon. This allows for the country to stay stabilized, as one branch will not have more control over the next. A concrete posteriori constitutional review is used in this system. A concrete constitutional system involves the constitutional review with regard to a particular legal case; a posteriori constitutional review happens only after a law is officially passed. For this reason, if the people of Entdeckungland feel

Show More
Related
742 Words | 3 Pages

The federal government and the states work side-by-side. Each have different powers and responsibilities in the government. Both are necessary for federalism. Since the beginning the two forms of government have been in a never-ending quarrel over uneven power balances. Through the years it has shown many power shifts, gains and losses, but the federal government always comes out on top.

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

This is evident in document A, where it shows you a Venn diagram of which powers are given to the states and which powers are given to the federal government. For one thing, this shows how “a double security arises to the rights of the people”, which means that when the power is distributed between the states and the federal government, neither is able to gain absolute power over the country. Federalism also comes in handy by specifying what the states get to control and what the national government gets to control, which is meant to prevent conflict between the two powers. For example, the task of declaring war is meant for the national government only. If that wasn’t specified, there would likely be a lot of cases where states declared war, and the national government had to clean up the mess.

Read More
298 Words | 2 Pages

The idea of a federalist government is great, however, it has some downsides as well. Some advantages of federalism include keeping the government closer to the people, where states have the freedom and authority to make government decisions to local preferences. Federalism also allows local differences to reflected in the state and local government policy and reduce conflicts, this reduces the friction between interests and lessens conflict. The independent subnational governments allow for flexibility and experimentation, where successful policy innovations in one state can be adopted by other states and also the federal government. The achievement of at least some national goals is made easier by the participation of independent subnational

Read More
1031 Words | 5 Pages

Positively, it gives the central government sufficient flexibility to respond to changing and unexpected fiscal needs arising among regions. On the negative side, it can created uncertainty for regional governments since they do not know how their grant will be allocated or how much they will receive. In the same vein, the third approach, the political negotiations, is often transparent and the federal government retains full discretionary authority to establish the fiscal needs of sub-national

Read More
115 Words | 1 Pages

Because of the strict division between the two types of government, dual federalism is sometimes called layer-cake federalism. Southern states including Texas conflicted with national government because at the time, federalism was trying to involve the touch of civil rights but the southern states wanted to maintain a segregated society because it’s important and necessary for our political and economy. As conservatives made many political inroads during the 1970s, a new concept of federalism, which was kind of an old concept of federalism, became popular. It was called, the New Federalism. Block grants was one of the way to give the state more power by allowing states to decide what to do with federal money.

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism is a fair way to divide powers, so that one group or person would not have more power than the rest when they are building and enforcing laws. This is reliable because federalism equally shares the powers. Therefore, it would not be biased while constructing the laws since everyone would have a say, unlike if one ruler would have all the

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism breaks apart the powers given to the central (Federal) government and those powers given to the states. As seen in document A1, a source from James Madison from Federalist Paper #51, 1788; Madison states, “In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments, and the portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments.” This idea from Madison is the idea of the division of power between the Federal Government and State Governments. Federalism provides a “Double security,” that protects the rights of the citizens of the United States of America. As the governments will be controlled by itself, the separate governments will also control each other.

Read More
1106 Words | 5 Pages

Interactions amid the provinces and the federal government, from constitutional issues to the most irresistible topics bang up-to-date in the country, are indemnified beneath the umbrella of “Federalism”. Authorities are shared so that on some matters, the state governments are decision-holders, whereas on the other matters, national government grasps the autonomy. In last twenty-five years, the upsurge of federal fiats on both governments, local and state, has shifted the power amongst state and national governments. Now, the national government is beginning to have more governance over the state’s engagements.

Read More
1114 Words | 5 Pages

Federalism is a system in which the power is shared between the national and regional government, following democratic rules. a. Dual Federalism: The first period of federalism was from 1789 to 1937, called dual federalism. In this stage, there was equality between the national and state government, but the functions of each of them were fundamentally separated; they rarely operate together.

Read More
1515 Words | 7 Pages

316). Rocher draws upon the same historical timeline as Trudeau when he alludes to the period of modernization in Quebec after WWII, however he focuses on the distribution of autonomy and responsibility to provinces for managing their own institutions separate from the central government (p. 316). The transfer of health care, education, social services, and economic development was representative of the pragmatism of the constitution and the sharing of jurisdictions between regional and central governments (p. 316). Although there is no mention of the role of nationalism by Rocher, he thoroughly mentions the role the central government plays in ensuring national unity, he describes the position of the federal government as “having to consult, coordinate and, inevitably, compromise in the face of mounting federal-provincial conflict”, this is connected to the discussion of compromise between the central and regional governments described by Trudeau (p.

Read More
218 Words | 1 Pages

The Constitution uses division of powers in order to prevent tyranny from occurring. James Madison, a man who was very dedicated towards our Constitution, decided upon dividing the government into two different sections, state and central, this idea is known as federalism. Powers needed to run a country are granted to the central governments, a few of those powers are printing and coin money, declare war, and regulate trade, and powers given to the state governments are the ability to hold elections, establish schools, and set up local governments. ( Document A ). The idea of federalism is important because it has a major effect on the prevention tyranny.

Read More
869 Words | 4 Pages

Since the end of the American Civil War, Federalism has been a very important idea in the United States. Federalism has appeared in many instances within different governmental ideas. The original idea of Federalism gave up states’ rights and handed them to the government to create a more centralized federal system. Over time Federalism has had many views by different leaders in our government. These viewpoints began with Ronald Reagan’s idea of “New-Federalism,” and carried on throughout time involving the Violence Against Women Act and more recently the urge to modify the Affordable Care Act.

Read More
328 Words | 2 Pages

Federalism works, in theory, because it allows city, county, state and our federal government to be closer to the problems

Read More
1616 Words | 7 Pages

Throughout this school year, we have encountered a number of texts that question our sense of what is truly american. The numerous issues that we have looked at include the american dream, pilgrims and the role of the rebel, and the traditional american hero. However, the protruding theme is that as Americans, we live in a society framed by collectivism but flooded by individualism. In the Declaration of Independence, our country’s first true binding document, the authors write a clause that shapes American values to this day: “[A]ll men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism Federalism is a system of government in which power is divided between federal government, state government and provinces government. While federalism has many benefits, among them is checks and balances between the federal and state government, thus reducing the chances of one party getting too powerful and abusing their power. Preventing one party from being too powerful and abusing their powers is a good thing. However, it comes with a price that federal and provinces (state and local) governments do not always see eye to eye and agree with each other, which turns into conflict.

Read More

More about Why Is Entdeckungland Be Considered An Asymmetric Federalism?

Related Topics

Open Document