ipl-logo

Examples Of Charlie Gordon In Flowers For Algernon

514 Words3 Pages

Ethan Bessette Putman Hour 6 15 November 2016 Argument Paper Ethics is a philosophy that values and customs a certain group. Showing what is right and wrong and informs responsibility. Charlie Gordon is the main character in the novel, "Flowers for Algernon". Charlie is not very smart, he has been selected for an operation to get smarter. Charlie Gordon's doctors did not act ethically when they performed the operation to make him smarter. The doctors didn't know enough about the project. They didn't test that much animals. From their research, the animals died afterwards so they needed to fix that before they tested a human being. That is not ethical because they didn't inform responsibility. It is almost like they had no regard for Charlie's life. In the article, "Five Steps to Better Ethical Decision Making." The first step is to gather facts (Dobrin). The scientist didn't gather all their facts. They were testing something new, it was very risky. There was too many unknown areas to this study and they did not have all there facts. Therefore, Charlie Gordon's doctors did not act ethically when they performed the operation to get him smarter, because they didn't know enough about the project. …show more content…

After Charlie was intelligent, they were unaware. The doctors should have connected with the people who cared about Charlie, they would have been more aware and they would have known more about the operation. His caring friends would know the risks and can determine if it is safe to preform. In the novel "Flowers for Algernon" His friends were uncomfortable with this change. They had no idea what happened to Charlie, so they had the right to act the way they acted (Siegler). Therefore, Charlie Gordon's doctors did not act ethically when they performed the operation to get him smarter, because they didn't notify Charlie's family or friends about the

Show More
Related
448 Words | 2 Pages

Charlie was a likable person before the operation, all the doctors came to wish him luck: "lots of people who gave me tests came to bring me candy and wish me luck"(314). This shows Charlie was loved and liked by many people in his life before the operation. After the operation, he was not that liked by the doctors who were angry at his unwillingness and for missing two weeks of journal entry's, "Dr.Strauss is very angry at me for not having written any progress reports in two weeks"(329). He also started to lose respect of the doctors after learning they only knew two languages:"I realized Dr.Nemur is not all genius. . . . Dr.Strauss on the other hand might be called a genius, although I feel that his area of knowledge are to limited"(330-1).

Read More
311 Words | 2 Pages

The doctors only did it so they could get credit and the fame. The scientist did not ask Charlie if he was sure about the experiment. Charlie looked back on it and said that he wouldn't of done it again at the end of the book. The doctors just took him and did the experiment. " Has the patient been informed of

Read More
354 Words | 2 Pages

Have you ever thought about brain stimulation, even once wondered what happened to those who tried it? Flowers for Algernon is a true story based on Charlie Gordon who sacrifices all he has and is because he wants to be smart. According to the text, Charlie Gordon was mentally impaired and was dumb. (No offence)

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

The scientists were not ethical while preparing and performing Charlies surgery in many ways. They had not thought about how Charlie's life would change when his intelligence would be increased, and also how his life would be after his intelligence rapidly decreased back to normal. According to Medical Ethics, the patient must be fully informed with all available information.

Read More
683 Words | 3 Pages

For that reason, Charlie was determined to commence with the operation and willing to overlook what risks he was aware of and unable to examine those he was unaware of. The doctors exploited Charlie’s loneliness and desperation and made him feel like being chosen was an honor, whereas they were conscious of the dire consequences. They performed the same surgery that doomed countless mice on Charlie with complete disregard for his life, as if he were just another mouse. The doctors’ pretense was to cure man kind of lower-level brain function in people like Charlie. However, the doctors’ true motive was to gain prestige in the field of psychology, so they recklessly sacrificed Charlie for their goals.

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

They were mainly doing the surgery for their own benefit. In the story "Flowers for Algernon," Charlie overhears the doctors talking about the release date for the surgery results. This tells readers that the doctors did not care what happened to Charlie; all they cared about was getting the title of being the first doctors to be successful in a surgery like this. They also cared more about seeing the effects of the surgery on a human so they could use it for their own benefit. Therefore, the doctors surely could not be ethical if all they cared about were themselves.

Read More
408 Words | 2 Pages

Petrina Arvanitakis Putman Hour 2-4 15 November 2016 Argument Essay Ethics are the acts, behaviors, or motives and if they are 'right or wrong '. In 'flowers for Algernon ' Charlie Gordon is a man who is disabled from low intelligence. Unfortunately, his doctors were not ethical when performing the procedure to make him smarter. Algernon was a small mouse that what a friend of Charlie 's, and he died in the procedure.

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

While reading Flowers for Algernon, the thing that stuck out to me the most was the ethical practices of the scientific professionals in the novel. I had been aware of this issue since the beginning of the book but it never really occurred to me until the press conference in Atlanta how wrong Professor Nemur and Dr. Strauss were. At the convention in Chicago, Charlie learns that the knowledge of Professor Nemur and Dr. Strauss is limited and they do not know as much as him. In fact Charlie says, “To hear him admit that both of them were ignorant of whole areas in their own fields was terrifying” (Keyes, 149). I am aware of the fact that there is no person that truly knows everything, but, like Charlie, I was was taken back to know

Read More
702 Words | 3 Pages

However, after the surgery, Charlie finds intelligence was a nice treat but was far from an importance in life and only took him away from what truly mattered. One could believe Charlie was wrong to undergo the surgery because of the side effects that came with the surgery such as physical and emotional instability, and amnesia, the depresion it came with, and how he lost all of his friends and loved ones with his extreme intelligence. First off, one reason Charlie should not have gotten the surgery is the depression and suicidal thoughts it came with for

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

Flowers for Algernon Argumentative essay Intelligence is a valued aspect to many people, but it can be achieved in options that aren’t labeled “intelligence-altering surgery”. The doctors, Dr.Nemur and Dr. Strauss do not follow the ethics of fieldwork. They chose the wrong person, Charlie Gordon, to do the surgery on, and didn’t wait to find out that the side-effects include death. In Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes, the doctors made a bad choice by choosing Charlie Gordon for the intelligence-altering surgery.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Two brave doctors decided to do a lifechanging procedure on Charlie to make him smarter. This completely changed his life. Such a transformative action was challenging more than Charlie, but the worlds morals. Some question the medical ethics, or the ground morals of a population, of this procedure. Charlie Gordon 's doctors did act ethically when they preformed the surgery to make him smarter.

Read More
1389 Words | 6 Pages

"Oh Lord How manifold are thy works! In wisdom Hast thou made them all: The earth is full of thy riches"( Psalms 104:24). The Grand Canyon is known to be one of the most fascinating places on earth. The Grand Canyon is outstanding; however one must see it to believe it. Over five million people visit the canyon ever year.

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

One reason that Charlie was better off before the surgery was because he had the motivation to learn. on page 268, Charlie Gordon says, “Mrs. Kinnian told that I was her bestest pupil in the adult nite scool becaus I tryed the hardest and reely wanted to lern.” This means that Charlie had the motivation to learn to be smart and he tried harder than anyone, so that was why she

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

The doctors failed to use a properly consenting patient, neglected Charlie’s emotional state, and failed to conduct proper research. If Charlie had a caretaker who could give consent on his behalf, similar to a minor, an operation of this sort could be ethical. Moreover, it could be ethical if the doctors’ research and further develop their theory before using a human test subject, and pay close attention to Charlie’s emotional and mental health. However, Charlie’s operation was performed without these precautions and guidelines, and he suffers greatly in the

Read More
695 Words | 3 Pages

In this essay, I am looking at ‘What are the ethics of saviour sibling’. The topic of ‘saviour sibling’ holds a range of positive and negative connotations. I have looked at 3 countries; The United Kingdom, China and Australia. In my chosen countries, a range of opinions on the topic are shared. In China, saviour sibling holds many positives for society and therefore it does not have any legal enforcements behind it.

Read More

More about Examples Of Charlie Gordon In Flowers For Algernon

Related Topics

Open Document