Examples Of Descartes Mind Body Dualism

763 Words4 Pages

The mind-body problem is a topic that deals with mental phenomena and their connections to the physical world. The existence of the body can be questioned, but not the presence of the mind. According to mind-body dualism, based on Descartes, the body is a physical object in space and time. Natural laws govern it. On the other hand, the mind is spiritual by nature. It exists forever and is not constrained by the laws of nature.
The natural world is based on strict, law-like regularities that rule the world we perceive.
Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia observed that Descartes's substance dualism had a flaw and that if something occurs in the physical world, it will affect and influence the mind. However, when the natural world determines the physical …show more content…

The dual existence of man is the focus of Cartesian dualism. Descartes thought that a man was made up of matter, the physical components necessary for walking, talking, and interacting. The mind is the nonphysical substance that thinks and wonders. It is sometimes equated with the soul. Descartes held a mechanistic view of the physical universe, according to which matter operates according to its laws unless the mind intervenes. Thus, the man's mind only "pulls the levers" to make the body perform what it wants. Precisely how the physical body and nonphysical mind interact is still being …show more content…

It does not assert that the mind and brain are identical; instead, it suggests that a distinction should be made between the methods and states of the two. Although the identity theory disputes the existence of such irreducible nonphysical features, other philosophers contend that experiences have fundamentally psychical, nonphysical properties. Identity theorists frequently identify as "materialists" or "physicalists" However, there are physics terms for things that are not always happy to be labeled as "material." According to the identity theory of mind, mental states and neural processes are mutually exclusive. It does not assert that the mind and brain are identical; instead, it suggests that the distinction should be made between the methods and, maybe, states of the two. Although the identity theory disputes the existence of such irreducible nonphysical features, other philosophers contend that experiences have fundamentally psychical, nonphysical